gitnexus-impact-analysis
abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus
Analyze code dependencies and blast radius before making changes.
What is gitnexus-impact-analysis?
GitNexus Impact Analysis shows what will break if you modify a symbol, function, or file. Use it before editing code to understand dependencies, affected execution flows, and risk level across your repository or multi-repo workspace.
- Find all direct and transitive callers of a symbol (upstream dependencies)
- Detect which code will break from a change with depth-based risk levels (d=1 WILL BREAK, d=2 LIKELY AFFECTED, d=3 MAY NEED TESTING)
- Analyze git-diff changes to show affected symbols and processes before commit
- Assess risk level (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, CRITICAL, UNKNOWN) based on affected symbols and execution flows
- Support multi-repository workspaces with explicit repo binding
- Handle linked worktrees and stale indexes with fallback CLI commands
How to install gitnexus-impact-analysis
npx skills add https://github.com/abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus --skill gitnexus-impact-analysis- GitNexus MCP server running and indexed (or npx gitnexus CLI available)
- Repository already indexed by GitNexus (run list_repos {} to confirm)
- Git repository with commit history for staleness detection
How to use gitnexus-impact-analysis
- 1.Call list_repos {} to bind the target repository (required if >1 repo is indexed)
- 2.Call impact({target: "symbolName", direction: "upstream"}) to find all callers and dependents
- 3.Review the depth-based results: d=1 items WILL BREAK, d=2 are LIKELY AFFECTED
- 4.Read gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes to check affected execution flows
- 5.Call detect_changes({scope: "all"}) before committing to see what your edits impact
- 6.Assess risk level (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/CRITICAL/UNKNOWN) and report findings with repo/worktree/index identity
Use cases
- Before refactoring a core function, check if 50+ callers depend on its signature
- Validate that deleting an unused export won't break downstream code
- Pre-commit check: run detect_changes to see what your edits affect across processes
- Understand blast radius when changing authentication or payment logic (critical paths)
- Resolve ambiguity in multi-repo setups by binding the correct repository before analysis
- Backend and full-stack engineers managing large codebases
- Teams using multi-repository monorepos or microservices
- Developers doing refactoring or API changes who need confidence before committing
- Code reviewers assessing the scope of a pull request
gitnexus-impact-analysis FAQ
The analysis could not resolve all callers—either due to dynamic dispatch, plain-object property access, or cross-language calls. Confirm with a text search before treating the symbol as safe to change or delete.
'upstream' finds callers and dependents (what breaks if you change this). This is the primary use case for pre-edit safety checks.
Your repository has new commits since the last analysis. Run `node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze` (or `npx gitnexus analyze`) to re-index before trusting the results.
Yes. Call list_repos {} to see all indexed repos, then pass `repo: "name"` on every impact() and detect_changes() call. Ask the user to clarify if the target is ambiguous.
The result is incomplete—a zero does not mean unaffected. Re-run the command rather than treating it as a passed pre-commit check.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus.
name: gitnexus-impact-analysis description: "Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?""
Impact Analysis with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Is it safe to change this function?"
- "What will break if I modify X?"
- "Show me the blast radius"
- "Who uses this code?"
- Before making non-trivial code changes
- Before committing — to understand what your changes affect
Bind the repository first
Impact analysis is the gate that authorizes an edit, so it must answer for the repository you are about to edit.
Call list_repos {} before the first tool call. With one indexed repository,
use the examples below as written. With more than one, pass repo on every
call: an omitted repo normally errors, but under an MCP policy with a
configured default it resolves to that default silently. If you cannot tell
which repository is meant, stop and ask — every result below an ambiguous
identity inherits the ambiguity. list_repos is paginated, so page with
offset: pagination.nextOffset until hasMore is false before concluding a
repository is absent.
detect_changes takes worktree when your changes are in a linked worktree
the MCP server was not launched from. The server auto-detects a worktree only
when it was launched from inside one; otherwise git diff runs in the wrong
checkout and reports zero changed symbols — a false clean check that carries
none of the degradation flags described below. In the CLI fallbacks, --repo .
means the current checkout; pass the intended repository path instead when you
are not standing in it.
State the bound identity with your risk report:
Repository: <name> (<path>) Worktree: <path> Index: <commit>, <n> behind HEAD
Workflow
0. list_repos {} → Bind repo (and worktree)
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "X" --direction upstream --repo .`
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes → Check affected execution flows
3. detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo .`
4. Assess risk and report to user, echoing repo/worktree/index identity
If "Index is stale" → run
node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyzein terminal. Hot-toolstalenessnames which index answered (branch/lastCommit) and how fresh it is (status). Re-analyze only forbehindordiverged—currentis identity,unknownis unmeasurable. If.gitnexus/run.cjsis missing, replacenode .gitnexus/run.cjswithnpx gitnexusin the fallback commands.
Checklist
- [ ] list_repos {} — bind repo; explicit repo when >1 indexed, ask if ambiguous
- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) or CLI fallback to find dependents
- [ ] Review d=1 items first (these WILL BREAK)
- [ ] Check high-confidence (>0.8) dependencies
- [ ] READ processes to check affected execution flows
- [ ] detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or CLI fallback for pre-commit check
- [ ] Confirm the checkout you edited is the checkout that was diffed
- [ ] Assess risk level and report, stating repo/worktree/index identity
Understanding Output
| Depth | Risk Level | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| d=1 | WILL BREAK | Direct callers/importers |
| d=2 | LIKELY AFFECTED | Indirect dependencies |
| d=3 | MAY NEED TESTING | Transitive effects |
Risk Assessment
| Affected | Risk |
|---|---|
| <5 symbols, few processes | LOW |
| 5-15 symbols, 2-5 processes | MEDIUM |
| >15 symbols or many processes | HIGH |
| Critical path (auth, payments) | CRITICAL |
| Zero callers found | UNKNOWN |
UNKNOWN is not a low rung on this scale — it means the walk could not answer.
An empty caller set is equally consistent with "genuinely unused" and "the
callers are not resolvable by the index" (plain-object property access, dynamic
dispatch, cross-language calls), so few-callers ⇒ LOW does not apply. The
result carries a riskNote saying so. Confirm with a text search before
treating the symbol as safe to change or delete.
risk is the edit gate: warn on HIGH/CRITICAL and stop on UNKNOWN until the
uncertainty is resolved. Within single-repo mode, compare File and symbol
targets with local riskSharedAxes (direct/total only). Within group mode,
compare only group results: their riskSharedAxes overlays resolved
cross-repo crossings on that local value. Never use either field to waive the
edit gate. Check riskScale.unusedAxes before comparing kinds: MCP File walks
omit process/module axes, while web Graph-RAG expands File targets to in-file
symbols before enrichment.
Tools
impact — the primary tool for symbol blast radius. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact <symbol> --direction upstream --repo . instead:
impact({
target: "validateUser",
repo: "my-app", // required once >1 repository is indexed
direction: "upstream",
minConfidence: 0.8,
maxDepth: 3
})
→ d=1 (WILL BREAK):
- loginHandler (src/auth/login.ts:42) [CALLS, 100%]
- apiMiddleware (src/api/middleware.ts:15) [CALLS, 100%]
→ d=2 (LIKELY AFFECTED):
- authRouter (src/routes/auth.ts:22) [CALLS, 95%]
detect_changes — git-diff based impact analysis. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo . instead:
detect_changes({scope: "all"})
→ Changed: 5 symbols in 3 files
→ Affected: LoginFlow, TokenRefresh, APIMiddlewarePipeline
→ Risk: MEDIUM
Add repo once more than one repository is indexed, and worktree: "<abs path>" when your changes are in a linked worktree the server was not launched
from.
partial: true (a graph query failed) or truncated: true (the changed-symbol
listing was capped) means the result is short of the truth, and reads like
UNKNOWN above: a zero there means unseen, not unaffected. Re-run it rather
than tick the pre-commit check.
A wrong-worktree zero carries neither flag and is shape-identical to a genuine clean result, so confirm the checkout you edited is the one that was diffed before treating an empty change set as a passed check.
Example: "What breaks if I change validateUser?"
0. list_repos {}
→ total: 2 (my-app, billing-api) — both define validateUser, so bind explicitly
1. impact({target: "validateUser", repo: "my-app", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "validateUser" --direction upstream --repo .`
→ d=1: loginHandler, apiMiddleware (WILL BREAK)
→ d=2: authRouter, sessionManager (LIKELY AFFECTED)
2. READ gitnexus://repo/my-app/processes
→ LoginFlow and TokenRefresh touch validateUser
3. Risk: 2 direct callers, 2 processes = MEDIUM
Repository: my-app (/abs/path/my-app) Worktree: same Index: current
With a single indexed repository, step 0 returns total: 1 and the repo
argument drops out of every call above.
Related skills
More from abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus and the wider catalog.

gitnexus-refactoring
Safely rename, extract, split, and move code across your codebase with automated impact analysis.

gitnexus-debugging
Trace bugs and errors through your codebase using AI-powered code analysis.

gitnexus-exploring
Explore codebases by querying execution flows, tracing calls, and understanding architecture.

fish-audio
Generate AI text-to-speech audio with saved voices or one-shot voice cloning via AceDataCloud API.

monitoring-operations
Set up OCI metrics, alarms, and log collection without common gotchas like namespace confusion and missing data handling.

actionbook
Browser automation engine with up-to-date action manuals for any website—operate multiple tabs concurrently without parsing.