PluginBench
Skill
Review
Audit score 70

gitnexus-impact-analysis

abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus

Analyze code dependencies and blast radius before making changes.

What is gitnexus-impact-analysis?

GitNexus Impact Analysis shows what will break if you modify a symbol, function, or file. Use it before editing code to understand dependencies, affected execution flows, and risk level across your repository or multi-repo workspace.

  • Find all direct and transitive callers of a symbol (upstream dependencies)
  • Detect which code will break from a change with depth-based risk levels (d=1 WILL BREAK, d=2 LIKELY AFFECTED, d=3 MAY NEED TESTING)
  • Analyze git-diff changes to show affected symbols and processes before commit
  • Assess risk level (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, CRITICAL, UNKNOWN) based on affected symbols and execution flows
  • Support multi-repository workspaces with explicit repo binding
  • Handle linked worktrees and stale indexes with fallback CLI commands

How to install gitnexus-impact-analysis

npx skills add https://github.com/abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus --skill gitnexus-impact-analysis
Prerequisites
  • GitNexus MCP server running and indexed (or npx gitnexus CLI available)
  • Repository already indexed by GitNexus (run list_repos {} to confirm)
  • Git repository with commit history for staleness detection
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use gitnexus-impact-analysis

  1. 1.Call list_repos {} to bind the target repository (required if >1 repo is indexed)
  2. 2.Call impact({target: "symbolName", direction: "upstream"}) to find all callers and dependents
  3. 3.Review the depth-based results: d=1 items WILL BREAK, d=2 are LIKELY AFFECTED
  4. 4.Read gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes to check affected execution flows
  5. 5.Call detect_changes({scope: "all"}) before committing to see what your edits impact
  6. 6.Assess risk level (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/CRITICAL/UNKNOWN) and report findings with repo/worktree/index identity

Use cases

Good for
  • Before refactoring a core function, check if 50+ callers depend on its signature
  • Validate that deleting an unused export won't break downstream code
  • Pre-commit check: run detect_changes to see what your edits affect across processes
  • Understand blast radius when changing authentication or payment logic (critical paths)
  • Resolve ambiguity in multi-repo setups by binding the correct repository before analysis
Who it's for
  • Backend and full-stack engineers managing large codebases
  • Teams using multi-repository monorepos or microservices
  • Developers doing refactoring or API changes who need confidence before committing
  • Code reviewers assessing the scope of a pull request

gitnexus-impact-analysis FAQ

What does 'UNKNOWN' risk mean?

The analysis could not resolve all callers—either due to dynamic dispatch, plain-object property access, or cross-language calls. Confirm with a text search before treating the symbol as safe to change or delete.

When should I use 'upstream' vs other directions?

'upstream' finds callers and dependents (what breaks if you change this). This is the primary use case for pre-edit safety checks.

What does 'Index is stale' mean?

Your repository has new commits since the last analysis. Run `node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze` (or `npx gitnexus analyze`) to re-index before trusting the results.

Can I use this across multiple repositories?

Yes. Call list_repos {} to see all indexed repos, then pass `repo: "name"` on every impact() and detect_changes() call. Ask the user to clarify if the target is ambiguous.

What if detect_changes returns 'partial: true' or 'truncated: true'?

The result is incomplete—a zero does not mean unaffected. Re-run the command rather than treating it as a passed pre-commit check.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus.


name: gitnexus-impact-analysis description: "Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?""

Impact Analysis with GitNexus

When to Use

  • "Is it safe to change this function?"
  • "What will break if I modify X?"
  • "Show me the blast radius"
  • "Who uses this code?"
  • Before making non-trivial code changes
  • Before committing — to understand what your changes affect

Bind the repository first

Impact analysis is the gate that authorizes an edit, so it must answer for the repository you are about to edit.

Call list_repos {} before the first tool call. With one indexed repository, use the examples below as written. With more than one, pass repo on every call: an omitted repo normally errors, but under an MCP policy with a configured default it resolves to that default silently. If you cannot tell which repository is meant, stop and ask — every result below an ambiguous identity inherits the ambiguity. list_repos is paginated, so page with offset: pagination.nextOffset until hasMore is false before concluding a repository is absent.

detect_changes takes worktree when your changes are in a linked worktree the MCP server was not launched from. The server auto-detects a worktree only when it was launched from inside one; otherwise git diff runs in the wrong checkout and reports zero changed symbols — a false clean check that carries none of the degradation flags described below. In the CLI fallbacks, --repo . means the current checkout; pass the intended repository path instead when you are not standing in it.

State the bound identity with your risk report:

Repository: <name> (<path>)   Worktree: <path>   Index: <commit>, <n> behind HEAD

Workflow

0. list_repos {}                                           → Bind repo (and worktree)
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "X" --direction upstream --repo .`
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes                   → Check affected execution flows
3. detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo .`
4. Assess risk and report to user, echoing repo/worktree/index identity

If "Index is stale" → run node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze in terminal. Hot-tool staleness names which index answered (branch/lastCommit) and how fresh it is (status). Re-analyze only for behind or diverged — current is identity, unknown is unmeasurable. If .gitnexus/run.cjs is missing, replace node .gitnexus/run.cjs with npx gitnexus in the fallback commands.

Checklist

- [ ] list_repos {} — bind repo; explicit repo when >1 indexed, ask if ambiguous
- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) or CLI fallback to find dependents
- [ ] Review d=1 items first (these WILL BREAK)
- [ ] Check high-confidence (>0.8) dependencies
- [ ] READ processes to check affected execution flows
- [ ] detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or CLI fallback for pre-commit check
- [ ] Confirm the checkout you edited is the checkout that was diffed
- [ ] Assess risk level and report, stating repo/worktree/index identity

Understanding Output

DepthRisk LevelMeaning
d=1WILL BREAKDirect callers/importers
d=2LIKELY AFFECTEDIndirect dependencies
d=3MAY NEED TESTINGTransitive effects

Risk Assessment

AffectedRisk
<5 symbols, few processesLOW
5-15 symbols, 2-5 processesMEDIUM
>15 symbols or many processesHIGH
Critical path (auth, payments)CRITICAL
Zero callers foundUNKNOWN

UNKNOWN is not a low rung on this scale — it means the walk could not answer. An empty caller set is equally consistent with "genuinely unused" and "the callers are not resolvable by the index" (plain-object property access, dynamic dispatch, cross-language calls), so few-callers ⇒ LOW does not apply. The result carries a riskNote saying so. Confirm with a text search before treating the symbol as safe to change or delete.

risk is the edit gate: warn on HIGH/CRITICAL and stop on UNKNOWN until the uncertainty is resolved. Within single-repo mode, compare File and symbol targets with local riskSharedAxes (direct/total only). Within group mode, compare only group results: their riskSharedAxes overlays resolved cross-repo crossings on that local value. Never use either field to waive the edit gate. Check riskScale.unusedAxes before comparing kinds: MCP File walks omit process/module axes, while web Graph-RAG expands File targets to in-file symbols before enrichment.

Tools

impact — the primary tool for symbol blast radius. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact <symbol> --direction upstream --repo . instead:

impact({
  target: "validateUser",
  repo: "my-app",          // required once >1 repository is indexed
  direction: "upstream",
  minConfidence: 0.8,
  maxDepth: 3
})

→ d=1 (WILL BREAK):
  - loginHandler (src/auth/login.ts:42) [CALLS, 100%]
  - apiMiddleware (src/api/middleware.ts:15) [CALLS, 100%]

→ d=2 (LIKELY AFFECTED):
  - authRouter (src/routes/auth.ts:22) [CALLS, 95%]

detect_changes — git-diff based impact analysis. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo . instead:

detect_changes({scope: "all"})

→ Changed: 5 symbols in 3 files
→ Affected: LoginFlow, TokenRefresh, APIMiddlewarePipeline
→ Risk: MEDIUM

Add repo once more than one repository is indexed, and worktree: "<abs path>" when your changes are in a linked worktree the server was not launched from.

partial: true (a graph query failed) or truncated: true (the changed-symbol listing was capped) means the result is short of the truth, and reads like UNKNOWN above: a zero there means unseen, not unaffected. Re-run it rather than tick the pre-commit check.

A wrong-worktree zero carries neither flag and is shape-identical to a genuine clean result, so confirm the checkout you edited is the one that was diffed before treating an empty change set as a passed check.

Example: "What breaks if I change validateUser?"

0. list_repos {}
   → total: 2 (my-app, billing-api) — both define validateUser, so bind explicitly

1. impact({target: "validateUser", repo: "my-app", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "validateUser" --direction upstream --repo .`
   → d=1: loginHandler, apiMiddleware (WILL BREAK)
   → d=2: authRouter, sessionManager (LIKELY AFFECTED)

2. READ gitnexus://repo/my-app/processes
   → LoginFlow and TokenRefresh touch validateUser

3. Risk: 2 direct callers, 2 processes = MEDIUM
   Repository: my-app (/abs/path/my-app)  Worktree: same  Index: current

With a single indexed repository, step 0 returns total: 1 and the repo argument drops out of every call above.