observability-and-instrumentation
addyosmani/agent-skills
Instrument code with logging, metrics, and tracing so production behavior is visible and diagnosable.
What is observability-and-instrumentation?
Observability and instrumentation makes production systems diagnosable by emitting structured telemetry. Use this skill when shipping any feature that runs in production, adding external integrations, or when production issues are reported but you lack the data to diagnose them. It covers structured logging, RED/USE metrics, and distributed tracing via OpenTelemetry.
- Define diagnostic questions before instrumenting to avoid noise and ensure signals answer real on-call needs
- Implement structured JSON logging with stable event names and machine-readable fields instead of string interpolation
- Add correlation IDs and entry-point attribution to reconstruct single requests across interleaved logs and services
- Instrument RED metrics (Rate, Errors, Duration) for request-driven services and USE metrics (Utilization, Saturation, Errors) for resources
- Set up distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation to track where time goes across service boundaries
- Enforce cardinality discipline: use only bounded label values (route templates, status classes, provider names) to avoid metric explosion
How to install observability-and-instrumentation
npx skills add https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation- OpenTelemetry SDK for your language (e.g., @opentelemetry/sdk-node for Node.js)
- A metrics backend (e.g., Prometheus) and log aggregation system (e.g., ELK, Datadog, CloudWatch)
- Structured logging library that supports JSON output and child loggers (e.g., Pino, Winston, Bunyan)
How to use observability-and-instrumentation
- 1.Write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about the feature before adding any instrumentation
- 2.Choose the right signal type for each question: structured logs for specific cases, metrics for aggregate trends, traces for cross-service latency
- 3.Implement structured logging with stable event names and machine-readable fields; add correlation IDs at system boundaries and propagate them downstream
- 4.Instrument RED metrics (Rate, Errors, Duration) on every endpoint and external dependency; use bounded label values only
- 5.Set up OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation at application startup before any other code runs; add manual spans only around meaningful internal work units
- 6.Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII; allowlist safe fields only
Use cases
- Shipping a new endpoint or service and needing to verify it works in production before incidents occur
- Diagnosing a production incident where logs and metrics don't provide enough detail to understand what happened
- Adding a retry loop or external API integration and needing to track success rates, latency percentiles, and failure reasons
- Reviewing a pull request that adds I/O, queues, or cross-service calls to ensure adequate instrumentation is included
- Setting up alerting rules and needing to define which metrics and thresholds should trigger pages
- Backend engineers shipping features to production
- On-call engineers diagnosing production incidents
- Platform and SRE teams defining observability standards
- Engineering leads reviewing PRs for production-readiness
observability-and-instrumentation FAQ
Metrics tell you *that* something is wrong (aggregate counts and latencies). Traces tell you *where* time went across services. Logs tell you *why* a specific event happened. Use all three: metrics alert you, traces narrow the scope, logs explain the root cause.
Every unique label combination creates a separate time series. Unbounded labels like user IDs, error messages, or raw URLs cause metric explosion and make the system unqueryable. Use only fixed, small sets: route templates, status classes, provider names.
No. Instrument the critical path: every endpoint, every external dependency, every retry loop, and every queue. Skip internal helper functions unless they're slow or frequently fail. Start with RED/USE and add detail only where on-call questions demand it.
Allowlist safe fields explicitly; never log whole request bodies or response bodies. Redact or omit user IDs, tokens, passwords, API keys, and full email addresses. Treat telemetry pipelines as a data-leak risk.
Start with structured logs and metrics; they're sufficient for most on-call work. Add distributed tracing later when you have multiple services and need to track latency across hops. OpenTelemetry makes it easy to add without rewriting code.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from addyosmani/agent-skills.
name: observability-and-instrumentation description: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data.
Observability and Instrumentation
Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production
- Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
- A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened")
- Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
- Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
NOT for:
- Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the
debugging-and-error-recoveryskill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time) - Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the
performance-optimizationskill - Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the
shipping-and-launchskill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
Process
1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
FEATURE: checkout payment retry
QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?)
3. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.
If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
2. Pick the right signal for each question
| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured log | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | payment_failed with provider error code |
| Metric | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls |
| Trace | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
Rule of thumb: metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why.
3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
// BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent
logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields
logger.warn({
event: 'payment_failed',
paymentId: id,
provider: 'stripe',
errorCode: err.code,
attempt: n,
}, 'payment failed');
Log levels — use them consistently:
| Level | Meaning | On-call action |
|---|---|---|
error | Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate |
warn | Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends |
info | Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None |
debug | Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
Correlation IDs are mandatory. Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
// Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream
app.use((req, res, next) => {
req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID();
req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id });
res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id);
next();
});
When several entry points write to one log, name the entry point. A correlation ID identifies a run; it does not say which code path started it. The same job reached by a scheduler, by a replay endpoint, and by a manual CLI run produces interchangeable lines in one sink, so attributing a line falls back to elimination — cross-reading the scheduler's history, the process table, a deploy log — and that argument holds only as long as those external records happen to still exist. Stamp the entry point where the run starts, next to the correlation ID, and propagate both the same way:
// One helper for every entry point: the run's own logger carries both fields.
// `entryPoint`, not `source` — ECS reserves `source.*` for network fields.
export const runLog = (entryPoint: 'scheduler' | 'replay_endpoint' | 'cli', runId: string) =>
logger.child({ entryPoint, requestId: runId });
// scheduler tick -> runLog('scheduler', crypto.randomUUID())
// POST /jobs/:id/replay -> runLog('replay_endpoint', req.id)
// CLI invocation -> runLog('cli', process.env.RUN_ID ?? crypto.randomUUID())
Both fields have to cross the same boundaries as the correlation ID — queue metadata, HTTP headers — or a worker re-derives the entry point and guesses. A field that merely correlates with an entry point is a hint, not an attribution: anything that can invoke the job can reproduce it.
Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII. This is a hard rule from the security-and-hardening skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
4. Metrics
For request-driven services, instrument RED on every endpoint and every external dependency: Rate (requests/sec), Errors (failure rate), Duration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use USE: Utilization, Saturation, Errors.
As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' prom-client — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
const httpDuration = new Histogram({
name: 'http_request_duration_seconds',
help: 'HTTP request duration',
labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200'
buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5],
});
Cardinality is the failure mode. Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.
OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe"
NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text
Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
5. Distributed tracing
Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
// tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else
import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({
serviceName: 'checkout-service',
instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
});
sdk.start();
Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., applyDiscounts, chargeProvider) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
6. Alerting
Alert on symptoms users feel, not on causes:
SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page):
error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85%
p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted
queue age > 10 min disk at 70%
Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
Rules for every alert you create:
- It must be actionable. If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
- It links to a runbook — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path.
- It has a threshold and duration justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess.
- Use two severities only: page (user-facing, act now) and ticket (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
Writing Runbooks
Rule 2 above requires every alert to link to a runbook. A runbook's job is to answer three questions without requiring the reader to think: what is happening, what to check first, and who to call if that doesn't resolve it. Store in docs/runbooks/ named after the alert.
Minimum viable runbook (three lines):
# Runbook: High Error Rate on /api/tasks
**Means:** DB connection pool likely exhausted, or a bad deploy.
**First check:** `SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE backend_type = 'client backend';`
— if count > pool limit, see Step 2. (Swap in the equivalent for your database.)
**Escalate to:** #db-oncall or engineering on-call rotation.
When to expand beyond three lines: add steps only when the first check alone isn't enough to decide. A five-step runbook that covers the three most common causes is better than a twenty-step document that covers every edge case and gets skimmed.
Keep runbooks current. Update the runbook as part of closing every incident it was used in — a stale runbook builds false confidence. If a step was wrong or missing, fix it before marking the incident resolved.
7. Verify the telemetry itself
Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by
requestId, confirm fields are structured (not[object Object]) - Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values
- Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
- Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. |
| "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. |
| "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. |
| "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. |
| "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. |
| "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. |
| "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
Red Flags
- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry
- Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields
- No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan
- One log stream fed by a scheduler, a webhook, and manual runs, with no field naming which one produced the line
- Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb)
- Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles
- Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action
- Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored
- Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs
- "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
Verification
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
- The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one
- All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line
- Every log sink written by more than one entry point carries an entry-point field, set where the run starts and propagated with the correlation ID rather than inferred downstream
- No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output)
- RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets
- Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable
- A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans
- Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once
- An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see ../../references/observability-checklist.md.
Related skills
More from addyosmani/agent-skills and the wider catalog.

performance-optimization
Measure, identify, and fix performance bottlenecks across frontend, backend, queries, and databases.

planning-and-task-breakdown
Break work into ordered, implementable tasks with clear acceptance criteria.

security-and-hardening
Audit and harden code against OWASP Top Ten vulnerabilities, injection, XSS, broken auth, and supply-chain risks.

shipping-and-launch
Pre-launch checklist and staged rollout framework for safe production deployments.

source-driven-development
Ground every implementation decision in official documentation, not memory or outdated patterns.

spec-driven-development
Write specifications before coding to align on requirements and prevent costly rework.