automation-audit-ops
affaan-m/ecc
Evidence-first inventory and overlap audit for automation jobs, hooks, connectors, and MCP servers.
What is automation-audit-ops?
Automation Audit Ops produces a read-only inventory of live, broken, redundant, or missing automations across jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, and wrappers before any fixes are made. Use it when you need to understand what automation is actually running, what is broken, and where overlap exists in your ECC workspace.
- Surfaces current live automation across repo hooks, GitHub Actions, MCP configs, connectors, and wrapper scripts
- Classifies each automation by live state: configured, authenticated, recently verified, stale, or broken
- Traces proof paths for every claim—file paths, workflow runs, hook logs, config entries, and failure signatures
- Identifies active breakage, auth outages, stale status, overlaps, and missing capabilities
- Produces keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendations for overlapping or suspect surfaces
- Separates configured-but-untested from actually-working automation
How to install automation-audit-ops
npx skills add null --skill automation-audit-ops- Access to read repo hooks, GitHub Actions workflows, and MCP configs
- ECC workspace with connectors, jobs, or hook scripts already in place
- Related skills available: workspace-surface-audit, knowledge-ops, github-ops, ecc-tools-cost-audit, research-ops, verification-loop
How to use automation-audit-ops
- 1.Run the skill and specify the automation surfaces to audit (e.g., 'all hooks', 'GitHub Actions', 'MCP servers', 'connectors')
- 2.Review the current surface inventory grouped by type: local runtime, repo CI, external systems, messaging, billing, research
- 3.Check the live-state classification for each automation: configured, authenticated, verified, stale, or broken
- 4.Read the proof paths cited for each claim—file paths, workflow runs, logs, or config entries
- 5.Review the findings table identifying active breakage, overlaps, stale status, and missing capabilities
- 6.Use the keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendations to decide next steps without making changes yet
Use cases
- Audit which jobs and hooks are live before attempting to fix or consolidate them
- Identify overlapping automation paths and decide which to keep, merge, or remove
- Trace why a connector or MCP server is not working by checking auth, config, and recent logs
- Compare what was ported from another agent system against what still needs rebuilding in ECC
- Discover missing automation capabilities by inventorying current surface against user needs
- DevOps and automation engineers managing multiple job runners and hook systems
- ECC workspace maintainers consolidating overlapping automation lanes
- Teams migrating from other agent systems and needing to audit what is live
- Engineering leads deciding which automation to keep, fix, or replace
automation-audit-ops FAQ
No. Start read-only unless you explicitly asked for fixes. The audit's value is in the evidence table and recommendations, not in immediate changes.
The skill will not claim it is live just because config references it. It classifies by actual state: authenticated, recently verified, stale, or broken, backed by proof.
The skill produces a recommendation table for each overlapping surface. Keep high-signal paths, merge redundant ones, cut low-value duplicates, and mark broken ones as fix-next.
Yes. It will surface MCP configs, check auth status, and cite proof paths like recent command output or config entries.
The skill will say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete. It will cite what is unclear and what additional verification is needed.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from affaan-m/ecc.
name: automation-audit-ops description: Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything. metadata: origin: ECC
Automation Audit Ops
Use this when the user asks what automations are live, which jobs are broken, where overlap exists, or what tooling and connectors are actually doing useful work right now.
This is an audit-first operator skill. The job is to produce an evidence-backed inventory and a keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendation set before rewriting anything.
Skill Stack
Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
workspace-surface-auditfor connector, MCP, hook, and app inventoryknowledge-opswhen the audit needs to reconcile live repo truth with durable contextgithub-opswhen the answer depends on CI, scheduled workflows, issues, or PR automationecc-tools-cost-auditwhen the real problem is webhook fanout, queued jobs, or billing burn in the sibling app reporesearch-opswhen local inventory must be compared against current platform support or public docsverification-loopfor proving post-fix state instead of relying on assumed recovery
When to Use
- user asks "what automations do I have", "what is live", "what is broken", or "what overlaps"
- the task spans cron jobs, GitHub Actions, local hooks, MCP servers, connectors, wrappers, or app integrations
- the user wants to know what was ported from another agent system and what still needs to be rebuilt inside ECC
- the workspace has accumulated multiple ways to do the same thing and the user wants one canonical lane
Guardrails
- start read-only unless the user explicitly asked for fixes
- separate:
- configured
- authenticated
- recently verified
- stale or broken
- missing entirely
- do not claim a tool is live just because a skill or config references it
- do not merge or delete overlapping surfaces until the evidence table exists
Workflow
1. Inventory the real surface
Read the current live surface before theorizing:
- repo hooks and local hook scripts
- GitHub Actions and scheduled workflows
- MCP configs and enabled servers
- connector- or app-backed integrations
- wrapper scripts and repo-specific automation entrypoints
Group them by surface:
- local runtime
- repo CI / automation
- connected external systems
- messaging / notifications
- billing / customer operations
- research / monitoring
2. Classify each item by live state
For every surfaced automation, mark:
- configured
- authenticated
- recently verified
- stale or broken
- missing
Then classify the problem type:
- active breakage
- auth outage
- stale status
- overlap or redundancy
- missing capability
3. Trace the proof path
Back every important claim with a concrete source:
- file path
- workflow run
- hook log
- config entry
- recent command output
- exact failure signature
If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete.
4. End with keep / merge / cut / fix-next
For each overlapping or suspect surface, return one call:
- keep
- merge
- cut
- fix next
The value is in collapsing noisy automation into one canonical ECC lane, not in preserving every historical path.
Output Format
CURRENT SURFACE
- automation
- source
- live state
- proof
FINDINGS
- active breakage
- overlap
- stale status
- missing capability
RECOMMENDATION
- keep
- merge
- cut
- fix next
NEXT ECC MOVE
- exact skill / hook / workflow / app lane to strengthen
Pitfalls
- do not answer from memory when the live inventory can be read
- do not treat "present in config" as "working"
- do not fix lower-value redundancy before naming the broken high-signal path
- do not widen the task into a repo rewrite if the user asked for inventory first
Verification
- important claims cite a live proof path
- each surfaced automation is labeled with a clear live-state category
- the final recommendation distinguishes keep / merge / cut / fix-next
Related skills
More from affaan-m/ecc and the wider catalog.
autonomous-loops
Patterns and architectures for autonomous Claude Code loops, from sequential pipelines to RFC-driven multi-agent DAG systems.
backend-patterns
Backend architecture patterns, API design, database optimization, and best practices for Node.js, Express, and Next.js.
benchmark
Measure performance baselines, detect regressions, and compare stack alternatives before/after changes.
benchmark-methodology
Agent skill from affaan-m/ecc.
benchmark-optimization-loop
Systematically benchmark and optimize code performance through measured iteration and variant testing.
blender-motion-state-inspection
Inspect Blender character rigs, poses, and animations with structured facts instead of screenshots alone.