PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

investor-outreach

affaan-m/ecc

Draft personalized cold emails, warm intros, and investor updates for fundraising outreach.

What is investor-outreach?

Generates concise, concrete investor communications for angels, VCs, and accelerators. Use this when you need to write cold emails, warm intro requests, follow-ups, or investor updates that are personalized, low-friction, and proof-driven rather than generic pitch templates.

  • Drafts cold emails with specific personalization tied to investor thesis, portfolio, or mutual connections
  • Creates warm intro request blurbs under 100 words for connectors to forward
  • Writes follow-up sequences (day 4–5 and day 10–12) with new data points
  • Generates post-meeting updates that recap discussion, promised answers, and next steps
  • Removes filler language, vague praise, and soft closes in favor of explicit asks

How to install investor-outreach

npx skills add null --skill investor-outreach
Prerequisites
  • Optional: run brand-voice skill first if you want outreach to match your company voice profile
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use investor-outreach

  1. 1.Provide investor details: name, fund/thesis, relevant portfolio companies, or mutual connection
  2. 2.Share your company's core value prop and one concrete proof point (traction, product, team credential)
  3. 3.Specify the message type: cold email, warm intro request, follow-up, or update
  4. 4.Skill will draft personalized copy with explicit ask and remove generic filler
  5. 5.Review for personalization fit; if context is missing, skill will flag it

Use cases

Good for
  • Reaching out to a VC partner who recently invested in a competitor or adjacent space
  • Requesting a warm introduction through a mutual connection with a forwardable pitch blurb
  • Following up after a first meeting to confirm discussion points and timeline
  • Sending investor updates during a fundraising process with concrete progress metrics
  • Tailoring outreach to an angel investor based on their public thesis or portfolio
Who it's for
  • Founders and CEOs running fundraising campaigns
  • Business development leads managing investor relations
  • Fundraising consultants drafting outreach on behalf of startups
  • Anyone preparing personalized investor communications at scale

investor-outreach FAQ

What if I don't have a personal connection to the investor?

Use their public thesis, recent investments, talks, or articles as your personalization hook. The skill requires at least one concrete tie-in; if none exists, it will note that the draft still needs research.

How long should these emails be?

Cold emails and follow-ups should be tight and scannable. Warm intro blurbs stay under 100 words. The skill enforces conciseness and removes filler.

Can I use this for multiple investors at once?

Yes, but each message must be genuinely personalized. The skill will reject generic copy that could go to any investor and ask you to add specific context per investor.

What if I want a longer follow-up sequence?

Default is three touches (day 0, day 4–5, day 10–12). You can request a longer cadence, but the skill will not keep nudging indefinitely without your explicit direction.

Should I use this before or after brand-voice?

If your company voice matters, run brand-voice first and share the voice profile. This skill will keep the investor-specific structure and ask discipline while respecting your tone.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from affaan-m/ecc.


name: investor-outreach description: Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications for fundraising. Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators and needs concise, personalized, investor-facing messaging. metadata: origin: ECC

Investor Outreach

Write investor communication that is short, concrete, and easy to act on.

When to Activate

  • writing a cold email to an investor
  • drafting a warm intro request
  • sending follow-ups after a meeting or no response
  • writing investor updates during a process
  • tailoring outreach based on fund thesis or partner fit

Core Rules

  1. Personalize every outbound message.
  2. Keep the ask low-friction.
  3. Use proof instead of adjectives.
  4. Stay concise.
  5. Never send copy that could go to any investor.

Voice Handling

If the user's voice matters, run brand-voice first and reuse its VOICE PROFILE. This skill should keep the investor-specific structure and ask discipline, not recreate its own parallel voice system.

Hard Bans

Delete and rewrite any of these:

  • "I'd love to connect"
  • "excited to share"
  • generic thesis praise without a real tie-in
  • vague founder adjectives
  • begging language
  • soft closing questions when a direct ask is clearer

Cold Email Structure

  1. subject line: short and specific
  2. opener: why this investor specifically
  3. pitch: what the company does, why now, and what proof matters
  4. ask: one concrete next step
  5. sign-off: name, role, and one credibility anchor if needed

Personalization Sources

Reference one or more of:

  • relevant portfolio companies
  • a public thesis, talk, post, or article
  • a mutual connection
  • a clear market or product fit with the investor's focus

If that context is missing, state that the draft still needs personalization instead of pretending it is finished.

Follow-Up Cadence

Default:

  • day 0: initial outbound
  • day 4 or 5: short follow-up with one new data point
  • day 10 to 12: final follow-up with a clean close

Do not keep nudging after that unless the user wants a longer sequence.

Warm Intro Requests

Make life easy for the connector:

  • explain why the intro is a fit
  • include a forwardable blurb
  • keep the forwardable blurb under 100 words

Post-Meeting Updates

Include:

  • the specific thing discussed
  • the answer or update promised
  • one new proof point if available
  • the next step

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • the message is genuinely personalized
  • the ask is explicit
  • the proof point is concrete
  • filler praise and softener language are gone
  • word count stays tight