context-budget
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
Audit Claude Code context consumption and get prioritized token-savings recommendations.
What is context-budget?
Scans all loaded agents, skills, MCP servers, and rules to estimate token overhead and identify bloat. Use this when session performance degrades, you've added many components, or you want to know how much context headroom remains before adding more.
- Inventories all agents, skills, rules, MCP servers, and CLAUDE.md files with per-component token estimates
- Classifies components as always-needed, sometimes-needed, or rarely-needed based on usage and overlap
- Detects bloat patterns: heavy agents, redundant skills, over-subscribed MCP servers, verbose CLAUDE.md
- Produces ranked token-savings recommendations sorted by impact
- Supports verbose mode for per-file breakdown and line-by-line analysis of heaviest components
How to install context-budget
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill context-budgetHow to use context-budget
- 1.Run `/context-budget` to scan all components and generate a summary report with top 3 optimizations
- 2.Review the component breakdown table to see token distribution across agents, skills, rules, and MCP servers
- 3.Check the warnings section for flagged issues ranked by token savings potential
- 4.Run `/context-budget --verbose` to see per-file token counts and line-by-line breakdown of heaviest files
- 5.Act on top recommendations: remove redundant MCP servers, trim agent descriptions, consolidate overlapping rules
Use cases
- Session performance feels sluggish or output quality is degrading after adding many components
- Planning to add new skills or MCP servers and need to verify available context headroom
- Identifying which agents, skills, or MCP servers consume the most tokens and can be removed or lazy-loaded
- Discovering duplicate or overlapping content between rules and CLAUDE.md that wastes context
- Auditing MCP server subscriptions to remove CLI-wrapper servers that duplicate free tools
- Claude Code users managing large multi-agent setups
- Teams optimizing context window usage across shared skill and rule libraries
- Developers planning component additions and needing capacity forecasting
- Anyone running the /context-budget command
context-budget FAQ
Prose uses words × 1.3; code-heavy files use chars / 4. MCP tool schemas are estimated at ~500 tokens each.
A single 30-tool MCP server can cost more tokens than all your skills combined. Each tool schema adds ~500 tokens regardless of whether it's used.
Yes. Even if an agent is never invoked, its description field is present in every Task tool context, so bloated descriptions (>30 words) waste context on every invocation.
Basic mode shows summary report with top optimizations. Verbose mode adds per-file token counts, line-by-line breakdown of heaviest files, specific redundant lines between components, and MCP tool list with per-tool schema estimates.
Run after adding any agent, skill, or MCP server to catch context creep early. Also run if session performance degrades or before planning major component additions.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from affaan-m/everything-claude-code.
name: context-budget description: Audits Claude Code context window consumption across agents, skills, MCP servers, and rules. Identifies bloat, redundant components, and produces prioritized token-savings recommendations. metadata: origin: ECC
Context Budget
Analyze token overhead across every loaded component in a Claude Code session and surface actionable optimizations to reclaim context space.
When to Use
- Session performance feels sluggish or output quality is degrading
- You've recently added many skills, agents, or MCP servers
- You want to know how much context headroom you actually have
- Planning to add more components and need to know if there's room
- Running
/context-budgetcommand (this skill backs it)
How It Works
Phase 1: Inventory
Scan all component directories and estimate token consumption:
Agents (agents/*.md)
- Count lines and tokens per file (words × 1.3)
- Extract
descriptionfrontmatter length - Flag: files >200 lines (heavy), description >30 words (bloated frontmatter)
Skills (skills/*/SKILL.md)
- Count tokens per SKILL.md
- Flag: files >400 lines
- Check for duplicate copies in
.agents/skills/— skip identical copies to avoid double-counting
Rules (rules/**/*.md)
- Count tokens per file
- Flag: files >100 lines
- Detect content overlap between rule files in the same language module
MCP Servers (.mcp.json or active MCP config)
- Count configured servers and total tool count
- Estimate schema overhead at ~500 tokens per tool
- Flag: servers with >20 tools, servers that wrap simple CLI commands (
gh,git,npm,supabase,vercel)
CLAUDE.md (project + user-level)
- Count tokens per file in the CLAUDE.md chain
- Flag: combined total >300 lines
Phase 2: Classify
Sort every component into a bucket:
| Bucket | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Always needed | Referenced in CLAUDE.md, backs an active command, or matches current project type | Keep |
| Sometimes needed | Domain-specific (e.g. language patterns), not referenced in CLAUDE.md | Consider on-demand activation |
| Rarely needed | No command reference, overlapping content, or no obvious project match | Remove or lazy-load |
Phase 3: Detect Issues
Identify the following problem patterns:
- Bloated agent descriptions — description >30 words in frontmatter loads into every Task tool invocation
- Heavy agents — files >200 lines inflate Task tool context on every spawn
- Redundant components — skills that duplicate agent logic, rules that duplicate CLAUDE.md
- MCP over-subscription — >10 servers, or servers wrapping CLI tools available for free
- CLAUDE.md bloat — verbose explanations, outdated sections, instructions that should be rules
Phase 4: Report
Produce the context budget report:
Context Budget Report
═══════════════════════════════════════
Total estimated overhead: ~XX,XXX tokens
Context model: Claude Sonnet (200K window)
Effective available context: ~XXX,XXX tokens (XX%)
Component Breakdown:
┌─────────────────┬────────┬───────────┐
│ Component │ Count │ Tokens │
├─────────────────┼────────┼───────────┤
│ Agents │ N │ ~X,XXX │
│ Skills │ N │ ~X,XXX │
│ Rules │ N │ ~X,XXX │
│ MCP tools │ N │ ~XX,XXX │
│ CLAUDE.md │ N │ ~X,XXX │
└─────────────────┴────────┴───────────┘
WARNING: Issues Found (N):
[ranked by token savings]
Top 3 Optimizations:
1. [action] → save ~X,XXX tokens
2. [action] → save ~X,XXX tokens
3. [action] → save ~X,XXX tokens
Potential savings: ~XX,XXX tokens (XX% of current overhead)
In verbose mode, additionally output per-file token counts, line-by-line breakdown of the heaviest files, specific redundant lines between overlapping components, and MCP tool list with per-tool schema size estimates.
Examples
Basic audit
User: /context-budget
Skill: Scans setup → 16 agents (12,400 tokens), 28 skills (6,200), 87 MCP tools (43,500), 2 CLAUDE.md (1,200)
Flags: 3 heavy agents, 14 MCP servers (3 CLI-replaceable)
Top saving: remove 3 MCP servers → -27,500 tokens (47% overhead reduction)
Verbose mode
User: /context-budget --verbose
Skill: Full report + per-file breakdown showing planner.md (213 lines, 1,840 tokens),
MCP tool list with per-tool sizes, duplicated rule lines side by side
Pre-expansion check
User: I want to add 5 more MCP servers, do I have room?
Skill: Current overhead 33% → adding 5 servers (~50 tools) would add ~25,000 tokens → pushes to 45% overhead
Recommendation: remove 2 CLI-replaceable servers first to stay under 40%
Best Practices
- Token estimation: use
words × 1.3for prose,chars / 4for code-heavy files - MCP is the biggest lever: each tool schema costs ~500 tokens; a 30-tool server costs more than all your skills combined
- Agent descriptions are loaded always: even if the agent is never invoked, its description field is present in every Task tool context
- Verbose mode for debugging: use when you need to pinpoint the exact files driving overhead, not for regular audits
- Audit after changes: run after adding any agent, skill, or MCP server to catch creep early
Related skills
More from affaan-m/everything-claude-code and the wider catalog.
security-review
Security checklist and patterns for authentication, input validation, secrets, and sensitive features.
golang-patterns
Idiomatic Go patterns, best practices, and conventions for building robust, efficient, and maintainable applications.
coding-standards
Baseline coding conventions for naming, readability, immutability, and quality across projects.
frontend-patterns
React and Next.js patterns for components, state management, performance, and modern frontend practices.
backend-patterns
REST/GraphQL API design, database optimization, and server-side patterns for Node.js, Express, and Next.js.
golang-testing
Go testing patterns: table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and TDD methodology.