PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

terminal-ops

affaan-m/everything-claude-code

Evidence-first terminal execution workflow for debugging, testing, and pushing verified fixes.

What is terminal-ops?

Terminal Ops is a narrowly-scoped operator workflow for real repo execution tasks: running commands, inspecting git state, debugging CI failures, and making verified local fixes. Use it when the user needs exact proof of what was executed, tested, and changed before committing or pushing.

  • Execute commands and capture exact output for debugging and verification
  • Inspect repo state, git diffs, and test failures before making changes
  • Keep fixes narrow and solve one dominant failure at a time
  • Report precise execution status: inspected, changed locally, verified locally, committed, or pushed
  • Integrate with ECC skills (verification-loop, tdd-workflow, security-review, github-ops, knowledge-ops) when relevant
  • Distinguish between local changes, local verification, commits, and upstream pushes

How to install terminal-ops

npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill terminal-ops
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use terminal-ops

  1. 1.Resolve the working surface: confirm repo path, branch, local diff state, and requested mode (inspect/fix/verify/push)
  2. 2.Read the failing surface first: inspect the error, relevant files, git state, and any supplied logs before making changes
  3. 3.Keep the fix narrow: use the smallest proving command first, solve one dominant failure at a time, and avoid broad retries
  4. 4.Execute the fix or verification command and capture exact output
  5. 5.Report execution status using precise words: inspected, changed locally, verified locally, committed, or pushed

Use cases

Good for
  • Debug a failing CI build by running the exact command locally and inspecting the error
  • Make a narrow fix to a single file, verify it with a minimal test, then push with proof
  • Audit repo state and git history without making changes
  • Investigate a test failure by running the failing test, inspecting the code, then applying a fix
  • Push a verified commit upstream only after the proving command has been rerun successfully
Who it's for
  • Developers debugging CI failures or test regressions
  • Engineers making targeted fixes with verification requirements
  • Teams needing audit trails of what was executed and verified
  • Operators pushing changes with exact proof of local verification

terminal-ops FAQ

When should I use Terminal Ops instead of general coding help?

Use Terminal Ops when the user explicitly asks to run commands, debug CI, check the repo, fix something, or push changes—and when the answer must include exact proof of what was executed and verified.

What does 'evidence-first' mean in this workflow?

It means inspecting the live repo state and error output before editing, running the proving command after any fix, and reporting exact status (inspected, verified locally, committed, pushed) rather than claiming success without proof.

Can I make broad changes or refactor while using Terminal Ops?

No. Terminal Ops is intentionally narrow. Solve one dominant failure at a time, use the smallest proving command first, and avoid widening a fix into repo-wide churn.

What should I do if a command keeps failing with the same error?

Stop broad retries and narrow the scope. Inspect the error more carefully, check the file or test directly, and use a smaller or more targeted proving command.

How do I integrate other ECC skills with Terminal Ops?

Pull in verification-loop for proving steps, tdd-workflow for regression coverage, security-review for auth/secrets, github-ops for CI/PR state, and knowledge-ops to capture verified outcomes into project context.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from affaan-m/everything-claude-code.


name: terminal-ops description: Evidence-first repo execution workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed with exact proof of what was executed and verified. metadata: origin: ECC

Terminal Ops

Use this when the user wants real repo execution: run commands, inspect git state, debug CI or builds, make a narrow fix, and report exactly what changed and what was verified.

This skill is intentionally narrower than general coding guidance. It is an operator workflow for evidence-first terminal execution.

Skill Stack

Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:

  • verification-loop for exact proving steps after changes
  • tdd-workflow when the right fix needs regression coverage
  • security-review when secrets, auth, or external inputs are involved
  • github-ops when the task depends on CI runs, PR state, or release status
  • knowledge-ops when the verified outcome needs to be captured into durable project context

When to Use

  • user says "fix", "debug", "run this", "check the repo", or "push it"
  • the task depends on command output, git state, test results, or a verified local fix
  • the answer must distinguish changed locally, verified locally, committed, and pushed

Guardrails

  • inspect before editing
  • stay read-only if the user asked for audit/review only
  • prefer repo-local scripts and helpers over improvised ad hoc wrappers
  • do not claim fixed until the proving command was rerun
  • do not claim pushed unless the branch actually moved upstream

Workflow

1. Resolve the working surface

Settle:

  • exact repo path
  • branch
  • local diff state
  • requested mode:
    • inspect
    • fix
    • verify
    • push

2. Read the failing surface first

Before changing anything:

  • inspect the error
  • inspect the file or test
  • inspect git state
  • use any already-supplied logs or context before re-reading blindly

3. Keep the fix narrow

Solve one dominant failure at a time:

  • use the smallest useful proving command first
  • only escalate to a bigger build/test pass after the local failure is addressed
  • if a command keeps failing with the same signature, stop broad retries and narrow scope

4. Report exact execution state

Use exact status words:

  • inspected
  • changed locally
  • verified locally
  • committed
  • pushed
  • blocked

Output Format

SURFACE
- repo
- branch
- requested mode

EVIDENCE
- failing command / diff / test

ACTION
- what changed

STATUS
- inspected / changed locally / verified locally / committed / pushed / blocked

Pitfalls

  • do not work from stale memory when the live repo state can be read
  • do not widen a narrow fix into repo-wide churn
  • do not use destructive git commands
  • do not ignore unrelated local work

Verification

  • the response names the proving command or test
  • git-related work names the repo path and branch
  • any push claim includes the target branch and exact result