PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

seo-competitor-pages

agricidaniel/claude-seo

Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages with feature matrices and schema markup.

What is seo-competitor-pages?

Creates high-converting "X vs Y" comparison pages, "alternatives to" pages, and product roundups targeting competitive intent keywords. Use when building comparison content, feature matrices, or alternatives pages that need accurate structured data and conversion optimization.

  • Generate comparison page templates with balanced feature-by-feature analysis and clear recommendations
  • Create feature matrix tables with multiple products and verifiable data points
  • Produce schema markup (Product, SoftwareApplication, ItemList) for search engine visibility
  • Provide keyword targeting strategies for comparison intent patterns like "[A] vs [B]" and "[A] alternatives"
  • Suggest conversion-optimized layouts with CTA placement, social proof sections, and trust signals
  • Flag data gaps and accuracy issues when competitor information is unavailable or unreachable

How to install seo-competitor-pages

npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-competitor-pages
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use seo-competitor-pages

  1. 1.Invoke the skill with a URL or product name and specify the competitor(s) to compare
  2. 2.Review the generated comparison page template with feature matrix and content outline
  3. 3.Check the schema markup JSON-LD for accuracy and customize for your product
  4. 4.Implement keyword strategy recommendations and internal linking suggestions
  5. 5.Verify all competitor data points from public sources before publishing
  6. 6.Add "last updated" timestamp and author expertise disclosure for trust

Use cases

Good for
  • Create a "Slack vs Microsoft Teams" comparison page with feature matrix and pricing comparison
  • Build a "Best project management tools 2026" roundup page with ranked alternatives and schema markup
  • Generate an "Alternatives to Notion" page listing competing products with pros/cons and use-case recommendations
  • Develop a feature comparison table for SaaS products with current pricing and capability verification
  • Optimize existing comparison pages with schema markup and internal linking strategy
Who it's for
  • SEO content strategists building competitive keyword content
  • Product marketers creating comparison and alternatives pages
  • SaaS companies targeting users evaluating multiple solutions
  • Content teams managing product comparison roundups and reviews

seo-competitor-pages FAQ

How do I ensure the comparison is fair and accurate?

Verify all competitor information from public sources (official websites, documentation, review sites). Test competitor features where possible, cite sources in the comparison table, clearly disclose which product is yours, and acknowledge competitor strengths honestly. Include "as of [date]" disclaimers on pricing data.

What if I can't find current pricing or feature information for a competitor?

Flag missing data points clearly in the comparison table using "Not publicly available" rather than guessing. The skill reports which competitor URLs failed and proceeds with available data, noting gaps in the comparison.

What schema markup should I use for a comparison page?

Use Product or SoftwareApplication schema for individual products with aggregateRating, and ItemList schema for roundup pages. The skill generates ready-to-implement JSON-LD that search engines use to display rich snippets.

How often should I update comparison pages?

Review and update quarterly or when competitors ship major changes. Include a "last updated" timestamp on the page and refresh pricing, features, and ratings regularly to maintain accuracy and search ranking.

Where should I place CTAs to maximize conversions?

Place a brief comparison summary with primary CTA above the fold, add "Try free" CTAs after the comparison table, and include a final recommendation with CTA at the bottom. Avoid aggressive CTAs in competitor descriptions to maintain trust.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from agricidaniel/claude-seo.


name: seo-competitor-pages description: > Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", "X vs Y", "versus", "compare competitors", or "alternative to". user-invocable: true argument-hint: "[url or generate] [competitor]" license: MIT metadata: author: AgriciDaniel version: "2.4.1" category: seo

Competitor Comparison & Alternatives Pages

Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.

Page Types

1. "X vs Y" Comparison Pages

  • Direct head-to-head comparison between two products/services
  • Balanced feature-by-feature analysis
  • Clear verdict or recommendation with justification
  • Target keyword: [Product A] vs [Product B]

2. "Alternatives to X" Pages

  • List of alternatives to a specific product/service
  • Each alternative with brief summary, pros/cons, best-for use case
  • Target keyword: [Product] alternatives, best alternatives to [Product]

3. "Best [Category] Tools" Roundup Pages

  • Curated list of top tools/services in a category
  • Ranking criteria clearly stated
  • Target keyword: best [category] tools [year], top [category] software

4. Comparison Table Pages

  • Feature matrix with multiple products in columns
  • Sortable/filterable if interactive
  • Target keyword: [category] comparison, [category] comparison chart

Comparison Table Generation

Feature Matrix Layout

| Feature          | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------------------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Feature 1        | ✅           | ✅           | ❌           |
| Feature 2        | ✅           | ⚠️ Partial   | ✅           |
| Feature 3        | ✅           | ❌           | ❌           |
| Pricing (from)   | $X/mo        | $Y/mo        | $Z/mo        |
| Free Tier        | ✅           | ❌           | ✅           |

Data Accuracy Requirements

  • All feature claims must be verifiable from public sources
  • Pricing must be current (include "as of [date]" note)
  • Update frequency: review quarterly or when competitors ship major changes
  • Link to source for each competitor data point where possible

Schema Markup Recommendations

Product Schema with AggregateRating

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Product",
  "name": "[Product Name]",
  "description": "[Product Description]",
  "brand": {
    "@type": "Brand",
    "name": "[Brand Name]"
  },
  "aggregateRating": {
    "@type": "AggregateRating",
    "ratingValue": "[Rating]",
    "reviewCount": "[Count]",
    "bestRating": "5",
    "worstRating": "1"
  }
}

SoftwareApplication (for software comparisons)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "name": "[Software Name]",
  "applicationCategory": "[Category]",
  "operatingSystem": "[OS]",
  "offers": {
    "@type": "Offer",
    "price": "[Price]",
    "priceCurrency": "USD"
  }
}

ItemList (for roundup pages)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "ItemList",
  "name": "Best [Category] Tools [Year]",
  "itemListOrder": "https://schema.org/ItemListOrderDescending",
  "numberOfItems": "[Count]",
  "itemListElement": [
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 1,
      "name": "[Product Name]",
      "url": "[Product URL]"
    }
  ]
}

Keyword Targeting

Comparison Intent Patterns

PatternExampleSearch Volume Signal
[A] vs [B]"Slack vs Teams"High
[A] alternative"Figma alternatives"High
[A] alternatives [year]"Notion alternatives 2026"High
best [category] tools"best project management tools"High
[A] vs [B] for [use case]"AWS vs Azure for startups"Medium
[A] review [year]"Monday.com review 2026"Medium
[A] vs [B] pricing"HubSpot vs Salesforce pricing"Medium
is [A] better than [B]"is Notion better than Confluence"Medium

Title Tag Formulas

  • X vs Y: [A] vs [B]: [Key Differentiator] ([Year])
  • Alternatives: [N] Best [A] Alternatives in [Year] (Free & Paid)
  • Roundup: [N] Best [Category] Tools in [Year], Compared & Ranked

H1 Patterns

  • Match title tag intent
  • Include primary keyword naturally
  • Keep under 70 characters

Conversion-Optimized Layouts

CTA Placement

  • Above fold: Brief comparison summary with primary CTA
  • After comparison table: "Try [Your Product] free" CTA
  • Bottom of page: Final recommendation with CTA
  • Avoid aggressive CTAs in competitor description sections (reduces trust)

Social Proof Sections

  • Customer testimonials relevant to comparison criteria
  • G2/Capterra/TrustPilot ratings (with source links)
  • Case studies showing migration from competitor
  • "Switched from [Competitor]" stories

Pricing Highlights

  • Clear pricing comparison table
  • Highlight value advantages (not just lowest price)
  • Include hidden costs (setup fees, per-user pricing, overage charges)
  • Link to full pricing page

Trust Signals

  • "Last updated [date]" timestamp
  • Author with relevant expertise
  • Methodology disclosure (how comparisons were conducted)
  • Disclosure of own product affiliation

Fairness Guidelines

  • Accuracy: All competitor information must be verifiable from public sources
  • No defamation: Never make false or misleading claims about competitors
  • Cite sources: Link to competitor websites, review sites, or documentation
  • Timely updates: Review and update when competitors release major changes
  • Disclose affiliation: Clearly state which product is yours
  • Balanced presentation: Acknowledge competitor strengths honestly
  • Pricing accuracy: Include "as of [date]" disclaimers on all pricing data
  • Feature verification: Test competitor features where possible, cite documentation otherwise

Internal Linking

  • Link to your own product/service pages from comparison sections
  • Cross-link between related comparison pages (e.g., "A vs B" links to "A vs C")
  • Link to feature-specific pages when discussing individual features
  • Breadcrumb: Home > Comparisons > [This Page]
  • Related comparisons section at bottom of page
  • Link to case studies and testimonials mentioned in the comparison

Output

Comparison Page Template

  • COMPARISON-PAGE.md: Ready-to-implement page structure with sections
  • Feature matrix table
  • Content outline with word count targets (minimum 1,500 words)

Schema Markup

  • comparison-schema.json: Product/SoftwareApplication/ItemList JSON-LD

Keyword Strategy

  • Primary and secondary keywords
  • Related long-tail opportunities
  • Content gaps vs existing competitor pages

Recommendations

  • Content improvements for existing comparison pages
  • New comparison page opportunities
  • Schema markup additions
  • Conversion optimization suggestions

Error Handling

ScenarioAction
Competitor URL unreachableReport which competitor URLs failed. Proceed with available data and note gaps in the comparison.
Insufficient competitor data (pricing, features unavailable)Flag missing data points clearly. Use "Not publicly available" in comparison tables rather than guessing.
No product/service overlap foundReport that the products serve different markets. Suggest alternative competitors that share feature overlap, or pivot to a category roundup format.