wp-guard
amelnagdy/guard-skills
Review WordPress code for security, performance, and best practices before shipping.
What is wp-guard?
wp-guard reviews generated or changed WordPress code—plugins, themes, and blocks—to catch systematic vulnerabilities before production. Use it reactively after an agent writes or edits code touching WordPress APIs, or proactively during development to enforce escaping, sanitization, nonces, prepared queries, core-API-first patterns, i18n compliance, and query discipline.
- Enforces escaping and sanitization of all user input and output across HTML, attributes, URLs, and inline JavaScript
- Verifies nonce and capability checks on all state-changing operations (forms, AJAX, REST endpoints)
- Validates prepared database queries with proper placeholders instead of string interpolation
- Ensures translation-ready strings with correct i18n wrappers and literal text domains
- Detects unbounded queries, uncached remote calls, and unconditional asset enqueues that harm performance
- Confirms use of WordPress core APIs (wp_remote_*, wp_enqueue_*, WP_Query, options/transients) instead of reinvented alternatives
How to install wp-guard
npx skills add https://github.com/amelnagdy/guard-skills --skill wp-guardHow to use wp-guard
- 1.After an agent generates or edits WordPress code, invoke wp-guard in guard-pass mode to review the diff or target files
- 2.Run the self-check: grep for echo/print without escaping, $_POST/$_GET without sanitization, $wpdb without prepare(), user-facing strings without i18n wrappers, and unbounded queries
- 3.Fix any violations flagged by the rules before showing the code to the user
- 4.For explicit review requests, walk the review checklist against target files and produce a findings report
Use cases
- Review a newly generated plugin before shipping to catch nonce/capability/escaping gaps
- Audit AJAX handlers and REST endpoints for proper sanitization and authorization
- Validate that user-facing strings are wrapped in translation functions with correct text domains
- Check database queries for SQL injection vulnerabilities via unprepared statements
- Ensure performance best practices like query limits, caching, and conditional asset loading
- WordPress plugin and theme developers
- AI coding agents generating WordPress code (Claude Code, Cursor)
- Teams reviewing agent-generated WordPress implementations before production
- Developers enforcing security and i18n standards across a codebase
wp-guard FAQ
wp-guard owns WordPress-specific security, APIs, i18n, and performance; clean-code-guard owns generic code quality. Use both when installed—they are complementary.
Use woo-guard alongside wp-guard for WooCommerce-specific order, product, and checkout logic. wp-guard does not cover WooCommerce HPOS, CRUD, or checkout rules.
No. Use test-guard for test code review and consult server/hosting documentation for configuration. wp-guard focuses on production WordPress code.
Project conventions win on cosmetic preferences, but security rules (escaping, sanitization, nonces, prepared queries) are non-negotiable and override any local style.
Read the project's CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md first. For multilingual sites, i18n rules become blocking. For WooCommerce, apply woo-guard rules alongside wp-guard.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from amelnagdy/guard-skills.
name: wp-guard description: "Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions."
WP Guard
You are reviewing generated or changed WordPress code before it ships. Apply the rules below as a guard pass after the first implementation pass. Be a sharp reviewer, not a pedantic one: flag what creates vulnerabilities, breaks translations, or melts servers — ignore cosmetic preferences WPCS tooling already handles.
These rules exist because AI agents produce WordPress code with systematic failures: raw echo of request data, AJAX handlers with neither nonce nor capability check, SQL built by string interpolation, English hardcoded into user-facing strings, posts_per_page => -1 on sites with a million posts, and hand-rolled replacements for APIs core already ships. Each one looks fine in a demo and fails in production.
How to use this skill
Guard-pass mode (recommended): after WordPress code has been generated or edited, apply the rules to the diff or target files, then run the self-check before delivery. Fix violations before showing the user.
Live mode (explicit): when the user invokes this skill before writing WordPress code, apply the same rules while writing, then run the self-check before delivery.
Review mode (the user asks you to review, audit, or rate WordPress code): walk references/review-checklist.md against the target files and produce a structured findings report. Do not edit code in review mode unless asked.
Pair this skill with clean-code-guard when both are installed: clean-code-guard owns generic code quality; wp-guard owns the WordPress layer.
Adapt to the project first
- Read the project's agent instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md),
phpcs.xml/WPCS config, andcomposer.json. Project conventions win on conflict. - Identify the established prefix (functions, options, meta keys, handles) and the minimum supported WP/PHP versions. Match both.
- Detect context: WooCommerce APIs in play → apply woo-guard alongside this skill when it is installed; otherwise apply WooCommerce's HPOS, CRUD, and checkout rules from its developer documentation. Multilingual site (WPML/Polylang/multisite) → i18n rules are blocking, not advisory.
- Read one neighboring file before writing. Mirror its error handling, hook registration style, and escaping habits — unless they violate the security rules below, which are non-negotiable.
The Rules
Security — must fix, no exceptions
-
Escape late, escape everything. Every variable crossing into HTML output goes through the context-correct function:
esc_html(),esc_attr(),esc_url(), orwp_kses()/wp_kses_post()for rich content. Data passed to inline JS goes throughwp_json_encode()+wp_add_inline_script()—esc_js()is legacy, for single-quoted strings in inline attributes only. Escaping happens at output, not at storage.echo $anything;without anesc_*wrapper fails review. -
Sanitize early, and unslash first. Request data (
$_POST,$_GET,$_REQUEST,$_SERVER) never touches logic raw:wp_unslash()first, then the type-correct sanitizer (sanitize_text_field(),sanitize_key(),absint(),sanitize_email(), …). Sanitization is not escaping; doing one never excuses the other. -
Every state change proves identity and intent. Form handlers, AJAX endpoints, and REST routes that change anything require BOTH a capability check (
current_user_can()) AND a nonce (check_admin_referer(),check_ajax_referer(), or REST nonce handling). A nonce is not authorization. A RESTpermission_callbackof__return_trueon a writing route fails review. -
$wpdb->prepare()for every query containing a variable. Placeholders (%s,%d,%f, and%ifor identifiers on WP ≥ 6.2), never interpolation or concatenation. PreferWP_Query, the meta and options APIs over raw SQL when they can express the query.
Core API discipline
-
Use the platform; don't reinvent it. Outbound HTTP via
wp_remote_get()/wp_remote_post(), never curl. Assets viawp_enqueue_script()/wp_enqueue_style(), never echoed<script>/<style>tags. Scheduling via WP-Cron or Action Scheduler. Redirects viawp_safe_redirect()followed byexit. File writes viaWP_Filesystem. Simple persistent data via options/transients, not a custom table. -
Verify every hook and function exists. Before
add_action(),add_filter(), or calling a core/plugin function, confirm it exists in the supported versions — read the source or the project's installed code. Hallucinated hooks fail silently in WordPress: no error, no behavior. Also match the hook to the moment — front-end code does not load onadmin_init, queries do not run beforeinitexpects them. -
Prefix or namespace everything public. Functions, classes, options, transients, meta keys, script handles, AJAX actions, REST namespaces — all carry the project prefix. Generic names (
get_settings,data,api_key) are collisions waiting for the next active plugin. -
Guard direct access. Every PHP file that does work starts with the
ABSPATHcheck (or equivalent project convention).
Internationalization
- Every user-facing string is translation-ready. The correct wrapper for the context (
__(),_e(),_x(),_n(), or the escaping combosesc_html__(),esc_attr__()), a literal text domain matching the plugin slug — never a variable or constant — translator comments on every placeholder,_n()for plurals (neversprintfwith a hardcoded singular/plural choice), and no sentence assembly by concatenation. Dates and numbers throughdate_i18n()/wp_date()andnumber_format_i18n(). Details and JS i18n: references/i18n.md.
Performance
-
Query discipline. No
posts_per_page => -1and noquery_posts(), ever. Use'fields' => 'ids'when only IDs are needed,'no_found_rows' => truewhen not paginating, and never query inside a loop what could be primed once (meta/term caches). Details: references/performance.md. -
Cache expensive work, load assets where used. Remote calls and heavy computations go behind transients or the object cache with a deliberate TTL. Options that are large or rarely read register with
autoload => false. Scripts and styles enqueue only on the screens that use them.
Self-check before delivery
- Grep your diff for
echo,print,<?=: is every variable output escaped with the context-correct function? - Grep for
$_POST,$_GET,$_REQUEST: unslashed? sanitized? nonce-verified? capability-checked? - Grep for
$wpdb->: every variable behind a placeholder? - Any user-facing string outside an i18n wrapper? Any non-literal text domain?
- Any hook or function you did not verify exists?
- Any unbounded query, uncached remote call, or unconditional enqueue?
- Does every new public name carry the project prefix?
- Would this survive WPCS (
WordPress-Extra+WordPress-Security) without warnings you cannot justify?
If any answer is wrong, fix it before showing the user.
Reporting format (review mode)
**Rule N violation** in `path/file.php:<line or function>`
- What: <one sentence>
- Risk: <XSS / SQLi / CSRF / broken i18n / scaling — one phrase>
- Fix: <one sentence>
Group by file, lead with security findings. If a file is clean, don't mention it.
Severity guide
- Must fix: Rules 1–4 — these are exploitable (XSS, SQLi, CSRF, privilege escalation)
- Should fix: Rules 5–9 — conflicts, silent failures, untranslatable releases
- Worth noting: Rules 10–11 — they decide whether the code survives traffic; block on them for code that runs on every request
References
- references/security.md — escaping/sanitization function tables, nonce lifecycle, REST permissions,
$wpdb->preparedetails, file uploads - references/i18n.md — wrapper selection, text domain rules, plurals, translator comments, JS translations, RTL, multilingual-plugin gotchas
- references/performance.md — WP_Query flags, transients vs object cache, autoload hygiene, asset loading, cron, scaling traps
- references/review-checklist.md — structured walk-through for review mode
- references/sources.md — handbook and research URLs; read only when citing a source
What this skill does not do
- Run PHPCS, PHPStan, or Plugin Check — use the project's tooling for mechanical verification; this skill is the judgment layer above it.
- Decide plugin architecture or business logic — it guards how WordPress code ships, not what it does.
- Replace clean-code-guard or test-guard — generic code quality and test quality remain their jurisdiction.
Related skills
More from amelnagdy/guard-skills and the wider catalog.

clean-code-guard
Review production code against Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure modes before shipping.

docs-guard
Verify documentation accuracy against source code before publishing.

test-guard
Review generated test code against universal testing rules before it ships.

woo-guard
Review WooCommerce code for HPOS safety, CRUD compliance, checkout validation, and money handling before shipping.

simple-english
Write or rewrite text in plain, layman-readable English following ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English rules.

add-analytics-instrumentation
End-to-end analytics instrumentation workflow: read code, discover trackable events, produce a concrete plan.