incident-response
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
Manage incidents from detection through postmortem with triage, communication, and blameless analysis.
What is incident-response?
Structured incident response workflow that guides you through triage (severity assessment, role assignment), communication (status updates, customer messaging), mitigation (timeline tracking, resolution confirmation), and postmortem (root cause analysis, action items). Use when production is down, an alert needs assessment, or after resolution to document lessons learned.
- Assess incident severity (SEV1-4) and identify affected systems and users
- Draft internal status updates and customer communications with consistent messaging
- Track incident timeline and confirm resolution status
- Generate blameless postmortem documents with 5-why root cause analysis
- Create action items with owners and priorities for follow-up
How to install incident-response
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill incident-responseHow to use incident-response
- 1.Run `/incident-response new [description]` with incident details to start triage phase
- 2.Assess severity level (SEV1-4) and assign roles (incident commander, communications, responders)
- 3.Use `/incident-response update [status]` to post status updates at regular cadence during mitigation
- 4.Document timeline of events and actions taken as incident progresses
- 5.Run `/incident-response postmortem` after resolution to generate postmortem document with root cause analysis and action items
Use cases
- Production outage requiring immediate triage and all-hands response
- Degraded feature affecting subset of users needing severity classification and status updates
- Post-incident postmortem writing to document timeline, root cause, and preventive actions
- Mid-incident status communication to stakeholders and customers
- Alert assessment to determine if incident warrants formal response workflow
- On-call engineers and incident commanders
- DevOps and SRE teams managing production systems
- Engineering managers conducting postmortem reviews
- Customer support teams communicating during incidents
incident-response FAQ
SEV1 is for service-wide outages affecting all users requiring immediate all-hands response. SEV2 is for major feature degradation affecting many users requiring response within 15 minutes.
Provide updates at regular cadence during active incident. Include what's happening, who's affected, what actions are being taken, and when the next update is expected.
Focus on systems, processes, and contributing factors rather than individual mistakes. Use the 5-why framework to identify root causes and systemic improvements.
Yes, if monitoring connectors are available, the skill can pull alert details and metrics. Check CONNECTORS.md for available integrations.
Each action item should have a clear description, assigned owner, priority level (P0/P1/P2), and due date for tracking and follow-up.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins.
name: incident-response description: Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution. argument-hint: "<incident description or alert>"
/incident-response
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Manage an incident from detection through postmortem.
Usage
/incident-response $ARGUMENTS
Modes
/incident-response new [description] # Start a new incident
/incident-response update [status] # Post a status update
/incident-response postmortem # Generate postmortem from incident data
If no mode is specified, ask what phase the incident is in.
How It Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INCIDENT RESPONSE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 1: TRIAGE │
│ ✓ Assess severity (SEV1-4) │
│ ✓ Identify affected systems and users │
│ ✓ Assign roles (IC, comms, responders) │
│ │
│ Phase 2: COMMUNICATE │
│ ✓ Draft internal status update │
│ ✓ Draft customer communication (if needed) │
│ ✓ Set up war room and cadence │
│ │
│ Phase 3: MITIGATE │
│ ✓ Document mitigation steps taken │
│ ✓ Track timeline of events │
│ ✓ Confirm resolution │
│ │
│ Phase 4: POSTMORTEM │
│ ✓ Blameless postmortem document │
│ ✓ Timeline reconstruction │
│ ✓ Root cause analysis (5 whys) │
│ ✓ Action items with owners │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Severity Classification
| Level | Criteria | Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Service down, all users affected | Immediate, all-hands |
| SEV2 | Major feature degraded, many users affected | Within 15 min |
| SEV3 | Minor feature issue, some users affected | Within 1 hour |
| SEV4 | Cosmetic or low-impact issue | Next business day |
Communication Guidance
Provide clear, factual updates at regular cadence. Include: what's happening, who's affected, what we're doing, when the next update is.
Output — Status Update
## Incident Update: [Title]
**Severity:** SEV[1-4] | **Status:** Investigating | Identified | Monitoring | Resolved
**Impact:** [Who/what is affected]
**Last Updated:** [Timestamp]
### Current Status
[What we know now]
### Actions Taken
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
### Next Steps
- [What's happening next and ETA]
### Timeline
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |
Output — Postmortem
## Postmortem: [Incident Title]
**Date:** [Date] | **Duration:** [X hours] | **Severity:** SEV[X]
**Authors:** [Names] | **Status:** Draft
### Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-language summary]
### Impact
- [Users affected]
- [Duration of impact]
- [Business impact if quantifiable]
### Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |
### Root Cause
[Detailed explanation of what caused the incident]
### 5 Whys
1. Why did [symptom]? → [Because...]
2. Why did [cause 1]? → [Because...]
3. Why did [cause 2]? → [Because...]
4. Why did [cause 3]? → [Because...]
5. Why did [cause 4]? → [Root cause]
### What Went Well
- [Things that worked]
### What Went Poorly
- [Things that didn't work]
### Action Items
| Action | Owner | Priority | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| [Action] | [Person] | P0/P1/P2 | [Date] |
### Lessons Learned
[Key takeaways for the team]
If Connectors Available
If ~~monitoring is connected:
- Pull alert details and metrics
- Show graphs of affected metrics
If ~~incident management is connected:
- Create or update incident in PagerDuty/Opsgenie
- Page on-call responders
If ~~chat is connected:
- Post status updates to incident channel
- Create war room channel
Tips
- Start writing immediately — Don't wait for complete information. Update as you learn more.
- Keep updates factual — What we know, what we've done, what's next. No speculation.
- Postmortems are blameless — Focus on systems and processes, not individuals.
Related skills
More from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and the wider catalog.

data-visualization
Pick the right chart and generate publication-quality Python visualizations with built-in design and accessibility best practices.

code-review
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness issues before merging.

documentation
Write and maintain technical documentation for APIs, READMEs, runbooks, and architecture guides.

build-dashboard
Build self-contained interactive HTML dashboards with charts, filters, and tables that open directly in a browser.

task-management
Track tasks in a shared TASKS.md file with optional visual dashboard.

memory-management
Two-tier memory system that decodes workplace shorthand so Claude understands requests like a colleague would.