PluginBench
Skill
Fail
Audit score 45

terraform-skill

antonbabenko/terraform-skill

Diagnose-first guidance for Terraform/OpenTofu modules, tests, CI, and state operations with version-aware risk controls.

What is terraform-skill?

A structured skill for writing, reviewing, and debugging Terraform and OpenTofu configurations. It emphasizes diagnosis of failure modes (identity churn, secret exposure, blast radius, CI drift, state corruption) before generating fixes, and enforces a response contract that includes assumptions, risk categorization, validation plans, and rollback notes.

  • Diagnose failure modes in Terraform/OpenTofu code using a routing table (identity churn, secret exposure, blast radius, CI drift, compliance gaps, state corruption, provider upgrade risk, testing blind spots)
  • Enforce a response contract: capture execution context, state assumptions, risk category, chosen remediation with tradeoffs, validation commands, and rollback procedures
  • Load reference materials on-demand (code patterns, security, state management, CI/CD, testing, module patterns) rather than preloading unnecessary depth
  • Generate HCL artifacts, migration blocks (moved, import), CI changes, and policy rules tailored to the diagnosed risk tier
  • Validate before finalizing using exact commands (fmt -check, validate, plan -out, policy checks) matched to runtime and environment criticality
  • Prevent destructive operations by requiring plan-destroy review and explicit user confirmation before any destroy or state-mutating change

How to install terraform-skill

npx skills add https://github.com/antonbabenko/terraform-skill --skill terraform-skill
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use terraform-skill

  1. 1.Provide your execution context: Terraform or OpenTofu version, provider(s), backend type, execution path (local/CI/Cloud/Atlantis), and environment criticality
  2. 2.Describe the task or failure symptom you are addressing
  3. 3.The skill will diagnose the failure mode(s) and load matching reference materials
  4. 4.Review the proposed fix, risk controls, and tradeoffs
  5. 5.Run the validation commands provided (fmt -check, validate, plan -out, etc.) before applying
  6. 6.For any destructive change, review the plan-destroy output and confirm explicitly before proceeding

Use cases

Good for
  • Refactoring Terraform modules and fixing resource address churn caused by count/for_each changes using moved blocks
  • Reviewing and hardening CI/CD pipelines to prevent drift between local and CI plans, unpinned versions, and missing approval gates
  • Diagnosing and recovering from state corruption, backend migrations, or stuck locks with safe recovery procedures
  • Identifying and mitigating secret exposure risks in defaults, state files, logs, and CI artifacts
  • Planning safe provider upgrades and removals by analyzing breaking changes and orphaned resources
Who it's for
  • Infrastructure engineers and DevOps teams writing or reviewing Terraform/OpenTofu code
  • Platform engineers designing IaC CI/CD pipelines and approval workflows
  • Cloud architects planning multi-region or multi-account deployments
  • Teams migrating or managing remote state backends and handling state recovery
  • Code reviewers needing systematic risk assessment for Terraform changes

terraform-skill FAQ

What is the Response Contract and why is it required?

The Response Contract ensures every Terraform response includes: assumptions and version floor, risk category addressed, chosen remediation with tradeoffs, validation plan with exact commands, and rollback notes. This prevents silent failures and ensures safe, auditable infrastructure changes.

When should I use moved blocks vs. import?

Use moved blocks when refactoring existing code (count to for_each, renaming resources) to preserve state identity without destroy/recreate. Use import when adopting existing infrastructure into Terraform state for the first time.

How do I prevent destroy cascades when using for_each with locals?

Always run terraform plan -destroy first and review every resource that will be deleted, including implicit dependents. Locals referencing a targeted resource make all for_each consumers implicit dependents. Get explicit user confirmation before proceeding.

What is the difference between resource modules, infrastructure modules, and compositions?

Resource modules group single logical units (VPC + subnets). Infrastructure modules combine resource modules for a purpose (multiple modules in one region). Compositions span multiple regions/accounts. Flow: resource → resource module → infrastructure module → composition.

How do I avoid CI drift between local and CI plans?

Pin all provider and module versions in versions.tf, use terraform plan -out artifacts reviewed before apply, enforce policy checks in CI, and never use -auto-approve on production applies.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from antonbabenko/terraform-skill.


name: terraform-skill description: Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging Terraform/OpenTofu modules, tests, CI, scans, or state ops - diagnoses failure mode (identity churn, secrets, blast radius, CI drift, state corruption) with version-aware guards. license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: Anton Babenko version: 1.17.1

Terraform Skill for Claude

Diagnose-first guidance for Terraform and OpenTofu. Core file is a workflow; depth lives in references loaded on demand.

Response Contract

Every Terraform/OpenTofu response must include:

  1. Assumptions & version floor — runtime (terraform or tofu), exact version, providers, state backend, execution path (local/CI/Cloud/Atlantis), environment criticality. State assumptions explicitly if the user did not provide them.
  2. Risk category addressed — one or more of: identity churn, secret exposure, blast radius, CI drift, compliance gaps, state corruption, provider upgrade risk, testing blind spots.
  3. Chosen remediation & tradeoffs — what was chosen, what was traded off, why.
  4. Validation plan — exact commands (fmt -check, validate, plan -out, policy check) tailored to runtime and risk tier.
  5. Rollback notes — for any destructive or state-mutating change: how to undo, what evidence to keep.

Never recommend direct production apply without a reviewed plan artifact and approval.

Never run terraform destroy (targeted or full) without first running terraform plan -destroy and showing the user every resource that will be deleted — including implicit dependents pulled in via locals or for_each. Get explicit confirmation before proceeding. Never use -auto-approve on destroy.

Workflow

  1. Capture execution context — runtime+version, provider(s), backend, execution path, environment criticality.
  2. Diagnose failure mode(s) using the routing table below. If intent spans categories, load both references.
  3. Load only the matching reference file(s) — do not preload depth the task does not need.
  4. Propose fix with risk controls — why this addresses the mode, what could still go wrong, guardrails (tests/approvals/rollback).
  5. Generate artifacts — HCL, migration blocks (moved, import), CI changes, policy rules.
  6. Validate before finalizing — run validation commands tailored to risk tier.
  7. Emit the Response Contract at the end.

Diagnose Before You Generate

Failure categorySymptomsPrimary references
Identity churnResource addresses shift after refactor, count index churn, missing moved blocksCode Patterns: count vs for_each, Code Patterns: moved blocks, Code Patterns: LLM mistakes
Secret exposureSecrets in defaults, state, logs, CI artifactsSecurity & Compliance, Code Patterns: write-only, State Management
Blast radiusOversized stacks, shared prod/non-prod state, unsafe appliesState Management, Module Patterns
Destroy cascadeTargeted destroy deletes more than expected; locals referencing a targeted resource make all for_each consumers implicit dependentsResponse Contract: plan-destroy first; State Management: Safe Destroy
CI driftLocal plan ≠ CI plan, apply without reviewed artifact, unpinned versionsCI/CD Workflows, Code Patterns: versions
Compliance gapsMissing policy stage, no approval model, no evidence retentionSecurity & Compliance, CI/CD Workflows
Testing blind spotsPlan-only validation of computed values, set-type indexing, mock/real confusionTesting Frameworks
State corruption / recoveryStuck lock, backend migration, drift reconciliationState Management
Provider upgrade riskBreaking-change provider bump, unpinned modulesCode Patterns: versions, Module Patterns
Provider lifecycleRemoving a provider with resources still in state, orphaned resources, removed block usageState Management: Provider Removal
Bootstrap / orchestration misusenull_resource + local-exec for bootstrap, remote-exec for setup scripts, provisioner stdout leaking secrets in CI logsCode Patterns: Provisioners as Last Resort
Navigation / safe-rename blind spotsCannot locate symbol defs/refs semantically, value-symbol rename done as blind text replace, grep-only refactor missing refs, hallucinated rg shimCode Intelligence
Cross-cloud / provider mapping"What's the Azure/GCP equivalent of X", picking a backend/auth model per cloudState Management: Cross-cloud equivalents

When to Use This Skill

Activate when: creating or reviewing Terraform/OpenTofu configurations or modules, setting up or debugging tests, structuring multi-environment deployments, implementing IaC CI/CD, choosing module patterns or state organization, configuring or migrating remote state backends.

Don't use for: basic HCL syntax questions Claude already knows, provider API reference (link to docs), cloud-platform questions unrelated to Terraform/OpenTofu.

Core Principles

Module Hierarchy

TypeWhen to UseScope
Resource moduleSingle logical group of connected resourcesVPC + subnets, SG + rules
Infrastructure moduleCollection of resource modules for a purposeMultiple resource modules in one region/account
CompositionComplete infrastructureSpans multiple regions/accounts

Flow: resource → resource module → infrastructure module → composition.

Directory Layout

environments/   # prod/ staging/ dev/  — per-env configurations
modules/        # networking/ compute/ data/ — reusable modules
examples/       # minimal/ complete/ — docs + integration fixtures

Separate environments from modules. Use examples/ as both documentation and test fixtures. Keep modules small and single-responsibility.

See Module Patterns for architecture principles, naming conventions, variable/output contracts.

Naming Conventions (summary)

  • Descriptive resource names (aws_instance.web_server, not aws_instance.main)
  • Reserve this for genuine singleton resources only
  • Prefix variables with context (vpc_cidr_block, not cidr)
  • Standard files: main.tf, variables.tf, outputs.tf, versions.tf

See Module Patterns: Variable Naming and Code Patterns: Block Ordering for examples.

Block Ordering (summary)

Resource blocks: count/for_each first → arguments → tagsdepends_onlifecycle. Variable blocks: descriptiontypedefaultvalidationnullablesensitive.

See Code Patterns: Block Ordering & Structure for the full rules and examples.

Testing Strategy

Decision Matrix: Which Testing Approach?

SituationApproachToolsCost
Quick syntax checkStatic analysisvalidate, fmtFree
Pre-commit validationStatic + lintvalidate, tflint, trivy, checkovFree
Terraform 1.6+, simple logicNative test frameworkterraform testFree-Low
Pre-1.6, or Go expertiseIntegration testingTerratestLow-Med
Security/compliance focusPolicy as codeOPA, SentinelFree
Cost-sensitive workflowMock providers (1.7+)Native tests + mocksFree
Multi-cloud, complexFull integrationTerratest + real infraMed-High

Native Test Rules (1.6+)

Before writing test code: validate resource schemas via Terraform MCP so assertions target real attributes.

  • command = plan — fast, for input-derived values only
  • command = apply — required for computed values (ARNs, generated names) and set-type nested blocks
  • Set-type blocks cannot be indexed with [0] — use for expressions or materialize via command = apply
  • Common set types: S3 encryption rules, lifecycle transitions, IAM policy statements

See Testing Frameworks for static-analysis pipelines, native-test patterns, Terratest integration, mock providers, and the full LLM-mistake checklist.

Count vs For_Each — Quick Rule

ScenarioUseWhy
Boolean condition (create / don't)count = condition ? 1 : 0Optional singleton toggle
Items may be reordered or removedfor_each = toset(list)Stable resource addresses
Reference by keyfor_each = mapNamed access
Multiple named resourcesfor_eachBetter identity stability

Never use list index as long-lived identity — removing a middle element reshuffles every address after it. For the decision matrix, safe migration playbook, moved block patterns, and known-at-plan failure cases, see Code Patterns: count vs for_each.

Locals for Dependency Management

Using try() in a local to prefer a conditional resource's attribute over its parent is a specialized but high-value pattern — it forces correct deletion order without explicit depends_on. Common use: VPC + secondary CIDR associations + subnets.

See Code Patterns: Locals for Dependency Management for the full pattern and worked example.

Module Development

Standard layout:

my-module/
├── README.md       # Usage documentation
├── main.tf         # Primary resources
├── variables.tf    # Typed inputs with descriptions
├── outputs.tf      # Output values
├── versions.tf     # required_version + required_providers
├── examples/
│   ├── minimal/
│   └── complete/
└── tests/
    └── module_test.tftest.hcl   # or Go for Terratest

Variable contracts: always description, always explicit type, use validation for complex constraints, use sensitive = true for secrets, prefer optional() with typed defaults (1.3+) over untyped map(any).

Output contracts: always description, mark sensitive outputs, expose stable subsets (not whole provider objects).

See Module Patterns for the full contract patterns, module release checklist, and LLM-mistake checklist.

CI/CD

Pipeline stages: validatetestplanapply (with environment protection).

Cost control: mock providers on PR validation, real-cloud integration only on main or scheduled, tag test resources, auto-cleanup.

Drift prevention: pin runtime and providers, commit .terraform.lock.hcl, apply the reviewed plan artifact from the plan stage (do not re-run plan inside the apply job), run policy/security stage on every path to apply.

See CI/CD Workflows for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Atlantis templates plus the LLM-mistake checklist.

Security & Compliance

Essential checks:

trivy config .
checkov -d .

Don't: store secrets in variables or .tfvars, use default VPC, skip encryption, open security groups to 0.0.0.0/0, use inline ingress/egress blocks in aws_security_group.

Do: source secrets from a cloud secret manager (AWS Secrets Manager / Azure Key Vault / GCP Secret Manager) or use write_only arguments on 1.11+, create dedicated VPCs, enforce encryption at rest and TLS, least-privilege SGs, use separate aws_vpc_security_group_{ingress,egress}_rule resources (e.g. AWS provider v5+).

Marking a variable sensitive = true masks display only — the value still lives in state. Use write_only / *_wo on 1.11+, or keep secret material out of Terraform entirely via runtime lookups.

See Security & Compliance for trivy/checkov pipelines, state-file hardening, compliance mappings, and the LLM-mistake checklist.

State Management

Never use local state in teams or production. Remote backends provide automatic locking, encryption, versioning, audit logging, and safe collaboration.

Choosing a Remote Backend

AWS example (Azure azurerm / GCP gcs / TF Cloud syntax: see State Management: Choosing a Remote Backend):

terraform {
  backend "s3" {
    bucket        = "my-terraform-state"
    key           = "prod/vpc/terraform.tfstate"
    region        = "us-east-1"
    encrypt       = true
    use_lockfile  = true   # Native S3 locking, 1.10+
  }
}

On Terraform < 1.10, use dynamodb_table = "terraform-state-lock" instead of use_lockfile. Azure Storage, GCS, and Terraform Cloud all offer built-in locking - see the State Management reference for syntax. For choosing among backends and their locking models, see Choosing a Remote Backend.

State Organization

PatternUse WhenExample Path
Per environmentDifferent teams per envprod/terraform.tfstate, staging/...
Per componentIndependent lifecyclesprod/vpc/, prod/eks/, prod/rds/
Hybrid (recommended)Both benefitsprod/networking/, prod/compute/, staging/networking/

Split state when: different teams, different update cadences, or >500 resources. Combine when: tightly coupled resources, <100 resources, same lifecycle.

See State Management for locking, migration, multi-team isolation, disaster recovery, and the LLM-mistake checklist.

Version Management

ComponentStrategyExample
Terraform runtimePin minorrequired_version = "~> 1.9"
ProvidersPin majorversion = "~> 5.0"
Modules (prod)Pin exactversion = "5.1.2"
Modules (dev)Allow patchversion = "~> 5.1"

Commit .terraform.lock.hcl intentionally. Keep provider/runtime upgrades in a separate PR from functional changes. See Code Patterns: Version Management for constraint syntax and upgrade workflow.

Modern Terraform Features (1.0+)

FeatureMin versionCommon use
try()0.13+Safe fallbacks, replaces element(concat())
nullable = false1.1+Prevent null silently overriding defaults
moved blocks1.1+Refactor without destroy/recreate
optional() with defaults1.3+Typed object attributes
import blocks1.5+Declarative imports, reviewable in VCS
check blocks1.5+Runtime assertions
Native terraform test1.6+Built-in test framework
Mock providers1.7+Cost-free unit testing
removed blocks1.7+Declarative resource removal
Provider-defined functions1.8+Provider-specific transformations (requires provider to declare functions)
Cross-variable validation1.9+Reference other var.* in validation blocks
write_only arguments1.11+Secrets never stored in state
S3 native lock-file1.10+State locking without DynamoDB

Before emitting a feature, verify the runtime floor. See Code Patterns: Feature Guard Table for the full table with common LLM error patterns per feature.

Runtime-Specific Guidance

  • Terraform 1.0-1.5 (OpenTofu starts at 1.6): Terratest for integration, static analysis + plan validation only (no native tests).
  • 1.6+: native terraform test / tofu test available — migrate simple unit tests, keep Terratest for complex integration.
  • 1.7+: mock providers cut test cost — mock for unit tests, real runs for final integration.
  • 1.10+: S3 native lock-file (use_lockfile) is the correct default for new configurations — DynamoDB locking is no longer required.
  • 1.11+: write_only arguments for secret handling keep credentials out of state.
  • Terraform vs OpenTofu: both supported. For licensing, governance, and feature delta, see Quick Reference: Terraform vs OpenTofu.

Code Intelligence (terraform-ls)

Semantic navigation for HCL. terraform-ls is optional; without it every row below degrades to a disclosed rg + Read fallback.

Self-contained terraform-ls layer of a generic code-intelligence discipline - apply the rows below directly. Recommended companion: the code-intelligence plugin (same antonbabenko/agent-plugins marketplace) carries the generic discipline (position anchoring, degradation gate, disclosure format, anti-phantom-shim) and ships /code-intelligence:doctor for readiness. If it is installed, defer to its generic protocol; this skill stays fully self-contained without it.

GoalUseTradeoff
Find definition / all referencesterraform-ls goToDefinition / findReferencesNeeds init + a position anchor
Rename value symbol (var/local/output/provider alias)Manual: findReferences -> per-file fresh Read -> edit -> validateNo rename provider
Rename resource/module addressmoved block + plan shows 0 destroyText rename forces destroy/recreate
Exact text / known name / .tfvars / non-HCLrg + ReadNo semantic scope

✅ Supported: goToDefinition, findReferences, documentSymbol, hover, workspaceSymbol. ❌ Unsupported: goToImplementation, call hierarchy, rename provider. Do not call these then report their absence as a finding.

  • ✅ Prereq: local terraform/tofu on PATH, terraform init run; cold start may need one retry.
  • ✅ LSP calls are position-anchored (file:line:character) - anchor with rg first, never symbol-name-only.
  • ❌ Do not claim "LSP broken, using rg" until the Degradation Gate passes; disclose any tool substitution on the first line.

Depth: Code Intelligence.

Reference Files

Progressive disclosure — essentials here, depth on demand:

  • Testing Frameworks — static analysis, native tests, Terratest, mock providers
  • Module Patterns — structure, variable/output contracts, terraform_remote_state rules, release checklist
  • CI/CD Workflows — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Atlantis, cost control
  • Security & Compliance — trivy/checkov, secrets handling, compliance mappings
  • State Management — backends, locking, migration, multi-team, recovery
  • Code Patterns — block ordering, count/for_each deep dive, modern features, version management, locals
  • Code Intelligence - terraform-ls capabilities, position-anchored calls, manual rename, degradation gate
  • Quick Reference — command cheat sheets, flowcharts, troubleshooting

License

Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE for full terms.

Copyright © 2026 Anton Babenko