PluginBench
Skill
Review
Audit score 70

fix-sentry-issues

brianlovin/agent-config

Discover and fix production issues by analyzing Sentry errors with root-cause investigation.

What is fix-sentry-issues?

Integrates with Sentry MCP to triage, investigate, and fix production errors. Use when you need to understand why errors occur, trace root causes upstream, and implement fixes—not just suppress warnings. Requires Sentry MCP server configured.

  • Discover unresolved issues across Sentry projects and build triage tables
  • Pull event-level details including stack traces, URLs, parameters, and status codes
  • Cross-reference error traces with Axiom logs for surrounding context
  • Trace input paths upstream to identify root causes rather than symptoms
  • Reproduce failures with actual data from Sentry events
  • Generate test cases and implement fixes that prevent errors at their source

How to install fix-sentry-issues

npx skills add https://github.com/brianlovin/agent-config --skill fix-sentry-issues
Prerequisites
  • Sentry MCP server configured and accessible
  • Sentry project(s) with unresolved issues
  • Access to application source code and logs (Axiom or equivalent)
  • Git repository for creating fix branches
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use fix-sentry-issues

  1. 1.Run Sentry MCP tool search to load available tools
  2. 2.Use find_organizations and find_projects to locate your Sentry workspace
  3. 3.Search for unresolved issues with naturalLanguageQuery to build a triage table
  4. 4.Classify each issue as 'Investigate' or 'Ignore' based on user impact and event frequency
  5. 5.For each 'Investigate' issue, pull event details and cross-reference with Axiom logs using traceId
  6. 6.Read the failing code path and trace the input upstream to find where bad data originates
  7. 7.Reproduce the failure using actual data from Sentry events
  8. 8.Create a test case that fails with the original code

Use cases

Good for
  • Investigate a spike in user-facing save failures and fix the underlying data validation issue
  • Triage a batch of production errors to identify which require investigation vs. which are expected states
  • Trace a timeout error back to its source and optimize the slow operation or adjust input handling
  • Identify and fix a stale database reference in a cron job that causes recurring errors
  • Distinguish between genuine failures and browser extension noise to focus engineering effort
Who it's for
  • Backend engineers debugging production issues
  • DevOps and SRE teams triaging error spikes
  • Full-stack developers investigating user-facing failures
  • Teams using Sentry for error monitoring and root-cause analysis

fix-sentry-issues FAQ

Should I close a Sentry issue if it has a fallback path?

No. A fallback means degraded user experience. Investigate why the primary path fails and fix it upstream. Closing the issue without fixing the root cause leaves the defect in production.

When is it okay to change log levels as a fix?

Only for genuinely expected states (e.g., optional column missing, resource deleted). Never downgrade log levels for failures with fallbacks—that's suppressing the symptom, not fixing the problem.

Should I fix multiple Sentry issues in one PR?

No. Each issue typically has its own root cause. Fix them individually in separate branches and PRs. Only combine if investigation proves they share an identical root cause.

How do I know if an issue should be ignored?

Ignore browser extension code, self-resolving errors like ChunkLoadError, single-event transients, and issues already fixed. Investigate user-facing failures, high-volume warnings, and recurring errors.

What's the difference between 'Investigate' and 'Ignore' during triage?

'Investigate' = multiple events, degraded user experience, or high-volume warnings. 'Ignore' = noise (extensions, transients) or already-fixed issues. Do not decide the fix during triage—only classify.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from brianlovin/agent-config.


name: fix-sentry-issues description: Use Sentry MCP to discover, triage, and fix production issues with root-cause analysis. Use when asked to fix Sentry issues, triage production errors, investigate error spikes, or clean up Sentry noise. Requires Sentry MCP server. Triggers on "fix sentry", "triage errors", "production bugs", "sentry issues".

Fix Sentry Issues

Philosophy

The Sentry error is not the problem. It's a signal.

Your goal is not to close the Sentry issue. Your goal is to discover the root cause, understand what's wrong with the application, and fix the underlying defect. Closing the Sentry issue is a side effect of doing that correctly.

Ask "Why does this fail?" — not "How do I make Sentry quiet?" Never treat log level changes as fixes. A fallback path means degraded user experience; trace why the primary path fails and fix it upstream.

Anti-patterns (do not do these)

  • Batch-classifying as "expected" without investigation. Seeing a fallback does NOT mean you understand the failure. Trace the full input path.
  • Treating "has a fallback" as "not a problem." Why does the primary path fail? Can we prevent it upstream?
  • Combining multiple issues into one PR. Each has its own root cause. Fix individually (except when investigation proves identical cause).
  • Throwing away error details. Never remove error from catch (error) or strip status codes. That data is how you understand failures.
  • Deciding the fix during triage. Classify as "Investigate" or "Ignore" only. You don't know the fix until investigation is complete.

Log level downgrade is valid ONLY for genuinely expected states (e.g., optional column missing, resource deleted) — NOT for failures with fallbacks.

Phase 1: Discover & Triage

Use Sentry MCP (ToolSearch first to load tools): find_organizations → find_projects → search_issues with naturalLanguageQuery: "all unresolved issues sorted by events".

Build a triage table. Action = Investigate or Ignore only:

IDTitleEventsActionReason
PROJ-AError in save14InvestigateUser-facing save failure
PROJ-BGM_register...3IgnoreGreasemonkey extension

Investigate: multiple events, degraded user experience, high-volume warnings, recurring on every run. Ignore: browser extension code, ChunkLoadError (self-resolving), single-event transients, already fixed.

Apply: mcp__sentry__update_issue(..., status: "ignored") or status: "resolved" for already-fixed.

Phase 2: Investigate (one issue at a time)

Work through these steps in order. Do not skip or batch issues.

  1. Pull event-level data — Issue summaries hide details. Use get_issue_details and search_issue_events with naturalLanguageQuery: "all events with extra data". Extract: URLs, params, stack traces, status codes, timestamps.

  2. Cross-reference Axiom — Events have traceId. axiom query "['shiori-events'] | where traceId == '<traceId>'" -f json for surrounding context (authMethod, client_version, request metadata).

  3. Read the failing code path — Follow the stack trace. Read every file. Understand before proposing changes.

  4. Trace the input path upstream (most often skipped, most important) — What data reaches the failing function? Should it have reached this path at all? Is there a missing filter? Is the input wrong (binary URL, redirect, bad format)? Can we prevent bad inputs upstream?

  5. Reproduce — Use actual failing inputs from Sentry. Call the function with exact data. fetch() the URLs that timed out. Verify your understanding.

  6. Identify root cause — Why does this input fail? Why does it reach this path? What's the right fix? (e.g., "Filter binary URLs before Firecrawl" — not "suppress the log")

PatternReal Fix
External API fails on certain URLsFilter/validate inputs before sending
TimeoutInvestigate what's slow; adjust timeout or input size
DB "invalid json"Sanitize before insert
Stale reference on cronDetect staleness, auto-clean

Phase 3: Fix

One branch per issue. git checkout main && git pull && git checkout -b fix/<descriptive-name>

  • Tests first — Use data from actual Sentry events. Test fails before fix, passes after.
  • Implement — Fix the root cause, not the symptom. If the fix is primarily a log level change, STOP: did you investigate why it fails, or just suppress?
  • Verify — Tests pass, lint passes, fix handles actual failing inputs.
  • PR — Include Root cause (upstream reason) and Fix (what changed and why it prevents the failure). Resolve in Sentry only after merge.