PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

clean-architecture

codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

4-layer .NET architecture with dependency inversion, domain-driven design, and use-case handlers.

What is clean-architecture?

Clean Architecture for .NET organizes code into Domain, Application, Infrastructure, and API layers with strict dependency rules. Use this when building layered .NET applications, discussing architecture patterns, or implementing domain-driven design with mediator-based use cases.

  • Enforces 4-project layout (Domain, Application, Infrastructure, Api) with compiler-enforced dependency inversion
  • Defines domain entities with business logic and behavior methods
  • Structures use cases as single-responsibility command/query handlers with validation
  • Abstracts persistence via IAppDbContext instead of repository pattern
  • Provides thin API endpoints that map HTTP requests to use cases
  • Supports infrastructure plugins (EF Core, email, external APIs) swappable without touching business logic

How to install clean-architecture

npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill clean-architecture
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use clean-architecture

  1. 1.Create four projects: Domain, Application, Infrastructure, and Api with correct project references (Domain has none, Application→Domain, Infrastructure→Application+Domain, Api→all)
  2. 2.Define domain entities in Domain layer with private state and public behavior methods
  3. 3.Create command/query classes and handlers in Application layer using Mediator pattern
  4. 4.Implement IAppDbContext in Infrastructure with DbSet properties for each aggregate root
  5. 5.Wire endpoints in Api layer to dispatch requests through Mediator to use case handlers
  6. 6.Configure dependency injection in Program.cs to register handlers, validators, and infrastructure services

Use cases

Good for
  • Building enterprise .NET applications with clear separation of concerns
  • Implementing domain-driven design with entity behavior and domain services
  • Organizing large codebases to prevent business logic from leaking into endpoints or data access
  • Swapping database providers or external service implementations without rewriting use cases
  • Enforcing validation and business rules at the domain and application layers
Who it's for
  • Backend .NET developers building scalable applications
  • Teams adopting domain-driven design principles
  • Architects designing layered systems with strict dependency rules
  • Projects requiring testable, maintainable code with clear boundaries

clean-architecture FAQ

Why use IAppDbContext instead of the Repository pattern?

EF Core's DbSet already provides repository functionality. IAppDbContext exposes DbSets directly, reducing indirection without sacrificing abstraction or testability.

Where does business logic belong?

Domain layer owns business rules as entity methods, domain services, or specifications. Application layer orchestrates use cases. Infrastructure and Api layers have no business logic.

How do I swap implementations (e.g., database or email sender)?

Define interfaces in Application or Domain, implement them in Infrastructure, and register the implementation in dependency injection. The rest of the code depends only on abstractions.

Should I use the Result pattern for error handling?

Yes. Return Result<T> from use case handlers to represent success or failure without throwing exceptions for expected failures. Domain exceptions can still be thrown for invariant violations.

How are endpoints structured?

Endpoints are thin wrappers that map HTTP requests to use case commands/queries, dispatch via Mediator, and return HTTP responses. Implement IEndpointGroup for auto-discovery.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit.


name: clean-architecture description: > Clean Architecture for .NET applications. Covers the 4-project layout (Domain, Application, Infrastructure, Api), dependency inversion, use case handlers, domain entities with behavior, and infrastructure as a plugin. Load this skill when building a project with Clean Architecture, discussing layered architecture, dependency inversion, use cases, or when the architecture-advisor recommends Clean Architecture.

Clean Architecture

Core Principles

  1. Dependency inversion is the foundation — All dependencies point inward. Domain has zero project references. Application references only Domain. Infrastructure references Application and Domain. Api references all but depends on abstractions. The compiler enforces this via project references.
  2. Domain owns the rules — Business logic lives in the Domain layer as entity methods, domain services, or specifications. The Domain layer has no knowledge of databases, HTTP, or any framework — only pure C# and .NET primitives.
  3. Use cases are the unit of work — Each use case (command or query) is a single class in the Application layer. It orchestrates domain objects, persists through abstractions, and returns a result. No "service" classes with 20 methods.
  4. Infrastructure is a plugin — EF Core, external APIs, email senders, file storage — all live in Infrastructure and implement interfaces defined in Application or Domain. Swap implementations without touching business logic.
  5. The API layer is thin — Endpoints map HTTP to use cases and use cases to HTTP responses. No business logic in endpoints.

Patterns

Project Layout

src/
  MyApp.Domain/
    Entities/
      Order.cs                    # Entity with behavior
      OrderItem.cs
    Enums/
      OrderStatus.cs
    Exceptions/
      DomainException.cs          # Base domain exception
    Interfaces/
      IOrderRepository.cs         # Only if query needs go beyond DbSet
    Common/
      Entity.cs                   # Base entity with Id
      Result.cs                   # Result pattern type

  MyApp.Application/
    Common/
      Behaviors/
        ValidationBehavior.cs     # Mediator pipeline behavior
      Interfaces/
        IAppDbContext.cs           # DbContext abstraction (preferred over repository)
    Orders/
      Commands/
        CreateOrder/
          CreateOrderCommand.cs
          CreateOrderHandler.cs
          CreateOrderValidator.cs
      Queries/
        GetOrder/
          GetOrderQuery.cs
          GetOrderHandler.cs
          OrderDto.cs

  MyApp.Infrastructure/
    Persistence/
      AppDbContext.cs              # Implements IAppDbContext
      Configurations/
        OrderConfiguration.cs
      Migrations/
    Services/
      EmailSender.cs               # Implements IEmailSender from Application
    DependencyInjection.cs         # AddInfrastructure extension

  MyApp.Api/
    Endpoints/
      OrderEndpoints.cs            # Thin, maps HTTP ↔ use cases
    Program.cs

DbContext Abstraction (Preferred Over Repository)

Define a minimal interface in Application; implement in Infrastructure:

// Application/Common/Interfaces/IAppDbContext.cs
public interface IAppDbContext
{
    DbSet<Order> Orders { get; }
    DbSet<Product> Products { get; }
    Task<int> SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken ct = default);
}

// Infrastructure/Persistence/AppDbContext.cs
public class AppDbContext(DbContextOptions<AppDbContext> options)
    : DbContext(options), IAppDbContext
{
    public DbSet<Order> Orders => Set<Order>();
    public DbSet<Product> Products => Set<Product>();

    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly(typeof(AppDbContext).Assembly);
    }
}

Why IAppDbContext over IRepository? EF Core's DbSet already IS a repository. Adding another abstraction on top adds indirection without value in most cases.

Use Case Handler (Command)

// Application/Orders/Commands/CreateOrder/CreateOrderCommand.cs
public record CreateOrderCommand(
    string CustomerId,
    List<OrderItemDto> Items) : IRequest<Result<Guid>>;

public record OrderItemDto(string ProductId, int Quantity, decimal UnitPrice);

// Application/Orders/Commands/CreateOrder/CreateOrderHandler.cs — uses Mediator (source-generated, MIT)
internal sealed class CreateOrderHandler(
    IAppDbContext db,
    TimeProvider clock) : IRequestHandler<CreateOrderCommand, Result<Guid>>
{
    public async ValueTask<Result<Guid>> Handle(CreateOrderCommand request, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var order = Order.Create(
            request.CustomerId,
            request.Items.Select(i => new OrderItem(i.ProductId, i.Quantity, i.UnitPrice)),
            clock.GetUtcNow());

        db.Orders.Add(order);
        await db.SaveChangesAsync(ct);

        return Result.Success(order.Id);
    }
}

// Application/Orders/Commands/CreateOrder/CreateOrderValidator.cs
public class CreateOrderValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateOrderCommand>
{
    public CreateOrderValidator()
    {
        RuleFor(x => x.CustomerId).NotEmpty();
        RuleFor(x => x.Items).NotEmpty();
        RuleForEach(x => x.Items).ChildRules(item =>
        {
            item.RuleFor(x => x.ProductId).NotEmpty();
            item.RuleFor(x => x.Quantity).GreaterThan(0);
            item.RuleFor(x => x.UnitPrice).GreaterThan(0);
        });
    }
}

Use Case Handler (Query)

// Application/Orders/Queries/GetOrder/GetOrderQuery.cs
public record GetOrderQuery(Guid OrderId) : IRequest<Result<OrderDto>>;

public record OrderDto(Guid Id, string CustomerId, decimal Total, string Status, DateTimeOffset CreatedAt);

// Application/Orders/Queries/GetOrder/GetOrderHandler.cs
internal sealed class GetOrderHandler(IAppDbContext db) : IRequestHandler<GetOrderQuery, Result<OrderDto>>
{
    public async ValueTask<Result<OrderDto>> Handle(GetOrderQuery request, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var order = await db.Orders
            .Where(o => o.Id == request.OrderId)
            .Select(o => new OrderDto(o.Id, o.CustomerId, o.Total, o.Status.ToString(), o.CreatedAt))
            .FirstOrDefaultAsync(ct);

        return order is not null
            ? Result.Success(order)
            : Result.Failure<OrderDto>("Order not found");
    }
}

Domain Entity with Behavior

// Domain/Entities/Order.cs
public class Order : Entity
{
    private readonly List<OrderItem> _items = [];

    private Order() { } // EF Core

    public string CustomerId { get; private set; } = null!;
    public OrderStatus Status { get; private set; }
    public decimal Total { get; private set; }
    public DateTimeOffset CreatedAt { get; private set; }
    public IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> Items => _items.AsReadOnly();

    public static Order Create(string customerId, IEnumerable<OrderItem> items, DateTimeOffset now)
    {
        var order = new Order
        {
            Id = Guid.CreateVersion7(),
            CustomerId = customerId,
            Status = OrderStatus.Pending,
            CreatedAt = now
        };

        foreach (var item in items)
            order.AddItem(item);

        return order;
    }

    public void AddItem(OrderItem item)
    {
        _items.Add(item);
        Total = _items.Sum(i => i.Quantity * i.UnitPrice);
    }

    public Result Cancel()
    {
        if (Status is not OrderStatus.Pending)
            return Result.Failure("Only pending orders can be cancelled");

        Status = OrderStatus.Cancelled;
        return Result.Success();
    }
}

Thin Endpoint Wiring (IEndpointGroup Auto-Discovery)

Every endpoint group implements IEndpointGroup and is auto-discovered via app.MapEndpoints(). Program.cs never changes when adding new endpoints. See the minimal-api skill for the full IEndpointGroup interface and EndpointExtensions setup.

// Api/Endpoints/OrderEndpoints.cs
public sealed class OrderEndpoints : IEndpointGroup
{
    public void Map(IEndpointRouteBuilder app)
    {
        var group = app.MapGroup("/api/orders").WithTags("Orders");

        group.MapPost("/", CreateOrder)
            .WithName("CreateOrder");

        group.MapGet("/{id:guid}", GetOrder)
            .WithName("GetOrder");

        group.MapGet("/", ListOrders)
            .WithName("ListOrders");
    }

    private static async Task<IResult> CreateOrder(
        CreateOrderCommand command, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var result = await sender.Send(command, ct);
        return result.IsSuccess
            ? TypedResults.Created($"/api/orders/{result.Value}", result.Value)
            : result.ToProblemDetails();
    }

    private static async Task<IResult> GetOrder(
        Guid id, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var result = await sender.Send(new GetOrderQuery(id), ct);
        return result.IsSuccess
            ? TypedResults.Ok(result.Value)
            : TypedResults.NotFound();
    }

    private static async Task<IResult> ListOrders(
        [AsParameters] ListOrdersQuery query, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var result = await sender.Send(query, ct);
        return TypedResults.Ok(result);
    }
}

Infrastructure DI Registration

// Infrastructure/DependencyInjection.cs
public static class DependencyInjection
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddInfrastructure(
        this IServiceCollection services,
        IConfiguration config)
    {
        services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
            options.UseNpgsql(config.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection")));

        services.AddScoped<IAppDbContext>(sp => sp.GetRequiredService<AppDbContext>());

        return services;
    }
}

Anti-patterns

Anemic Domain Model

// BAD — entity is just a data bag, all logic in handler
public class Order
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string CustomerId { get; set; } = null!;
    public decimal Total { get; set; }
    public List<OrderItem> Items { get; set; } = [];
}

// Handler sets everything directly
order.Total = order.Items.Sum(i => i.Quantity * i.UnitPrice);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Pending;

// GOOD — entity encapsulates its own rules (see Domain Entity pattern above)
var order = Order.Create(customerId, items, clock.GetUtcNow());

DbContext in Domain Layer

// BAD — Domain references EF Core
// Domain/Services/OrderService.cs
public class OrderService(AppDbContext db) { } // Domain depends on Infrastructure!

// GOOD — Domain defines interfaces, Infrastructure implements
// Domain/Interfaces/IOrderRepository.cs (only if you need query abstraction beyond DbSet)
// Application/Common/Interfaces/IAppDbContext.cs (preferred)

Fat Endpoints

// BAD — business logic in the endpoint
app.MapPost("/orders", async (CreateOrderRequest req, AppDbContext db) =>
{
    var order = new Order { CustomerId = req.CustomerId };
    foreach (var item in req.Items)
    {
        order.Items.Add(new OrderItem { ProductId = item.ProductId, Quantity = item.Quantity });
    }
    order.Total = order.Items.Sum(i => i.Quantity * i.UnitPrice);
    db.Orders.Add(order);
    await db.SaveChangesAsync();
    return TypedResults.Created($"/orders/{order.Id}", order);
});

// GOOD — endpoint delegates to a use case
app.MapPost("/orders", async (CreateOrderCommand command, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct) =>
{
    var result = await sender.Send(command, ct);
    return result.IsSuccess
        ? TypedResults.Created($"/orders/{result.Value}", result.Value)
        : result.ToProblemDetails();
});

Repository for Every Entity

// BAD — repository per entity duplicates DbSet functionality
public interface IOrderRepository { Task<Order?> GetByIdAsync(Guid id); }
public interface IProductRepository { Task<Product?> GetByIdAsync(Guid id); }
public interface ICustomerRepository { Task<Customer?> GetByIdAsync(Guid id); }

// GOOD — use IAppDbContext with DbSet<T> directly
// Only create a repository interface when you have complex query logic
// that you want to test in isolation or reuse across multiple use cases

Decision Guide

ScenarioRecommendation
When to use CA over VSAMedium+ domain complexity, long-lived system, team familiar with layers
When to add a Domain layerBusiness rules involve invariants across entity groups
IAppDbContext vs repositoriesPrefer IAppDbContext; add repository only for complex reusable queries
Mediator vs raw handlers in CAMediator for pipeline behaviors (validation, logging); raw handlers for simplicity
When to add Domain eventsWhen side effects (notifications, audit) should be decoupled from the main flow
Evolving from VSA to CAWhen handlers start needing shared domain logic that does not belong in Common/