PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

verify

codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

7-phase verification pipeline for .NET projects: build, diagnostics, antipatterns, tests, security, formatting, and diff review.

What is verify?

Runs a sequential verification pipeline that catches issues at every level—from compiler errors to antipatterns to formatting drift. Each phase produces an explicit PASS/WARN/FAIL with actionable output. Use when completing a feature, before creating a pull request, or when you need to verify code is ready for review.

  • Executes 7 sequential phases: build, diagnostics, antipattern detection, tests, security scan, format check, and diff review
  • Short-circuits on critical failures (build and tests) to avoid meaningless downstream results
  • Compares diagnostics against baseline to flag only new warnings introduced by current changes
  • Detects antipatterns: async void, sync-over-async, DateTime.Now, broad catch blocks, missing CancellationToken, and more
  • Scans for vulnerable packages and reviews code for hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, missing authorization, and permissive CORS
  • Produces a final summary table with verdict: READY FOR REVIEW or NEEDS FIXES with specific remediation steps

How to install verify

npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill verify
Prerequisites
  • A .NET project with a solution file (.sln)
  • dotnet CLI installed and accessible
  • Optional: Roslyn MCP tools (get_diagnostics, detect_antipatterns) for phases 2 and 3
  • Optional: git repository for diff review (phase 7)
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use verify

  1. 1.Run `/verify` to execute the full 7-phase pipeline
  2. 2.Review the summary table showing PASS/WARN/FAIL for each phase
  3. 3.For any FAIL verdict, identify the specific phase and error from the output
  4. 4.Fix the issue (e.g., resolve compiler error, update code, add test)
  5. 5.Re-run `/verify` from phase 1 if code changed; otherwise re-run from the failed phase
  6. 6.Repeat until all phases pass or only non-blocking warnings remain
  7. 7.Include the verification report in your pull request description

Use cases

Good for
  • Pre-pull request verification: run full pipeline before submitting code for review
  • After completing a feature or major refactor: ensure no regressions or quality drift
  • Dependency updates: verify build, tests, and security vulnerabilities after upgrading packages
  • Bug fix validation: run phases 1, 2, 4 to confirm the fix works and introduces no new issues
  • Post-merge checks: verify code quality after pulling upstream changes or resolving conflicts
Who it's for
  • Backend developers working on .NET projects
  • Teams enforcing code quality gates before pull requests
  • Developers preparing code for code review
  • CI/CD pipeline maintainers looking to standardize verification steps

verify FAQ

Should I run all 7 phases every time?

Full pipeline is the default and recommended for pre-PR checks. For scoped changes (e.g., formatting only, config changes), you can run a subset, but when in doubt, run all 7—extra phases cost minutes; a missed security issue costs days.

What does it mean if phase 2 (Diagnostics) shows WARN instead of PASS?

WARN means new analyzer warnings were introduced by your changes (e.g., nullability issues CS8600/CS8602). Treat these as work—today's warning is tomorrow's production bug. Fix them before merging.

What happens if the build fails in phase 1?

Phase 1 is critical and short-circuits the pipeline. Nothing downstream is meaningful on code that does not compile. Fix the build errors and re-run from phase 1.

Can I skip the security scan (phase 5) if my changes are small?

No. Security issues are often subtle and hidden in small changes. Always run phase 5, especially for changes touching authentication, authorization, data access, or external APIs.

What if I don't have a test project?

Phase 4 will SKIP with a recommendation to add tests. For production code, this is a gap—consider adding a test project and covering your changes before the next verification run.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit.


name: verify description: > Run a comprehensive 7-phase verification pipeline for .NET projects: build, analyzers, antipattern detection, tests, security, formatting, and diff review. Each phase produces PASS/FAIL with actionable output and the pipeline short-circuits on critical failures. Also the authority on verification strategy: which phases to run for a given change, quality gates, and fix-and-retry loops. Use when: "verify", "check everything", "is this ready", "pre-PR check", "run all checks", "quality gate", "verification strategy", "which checks should run", or after completing a feature or refactor.

/verify -- 7-Phase Verification Pipeline

What

Runs a sequential, 7-phase verification pipeline that catches issues at every level -- from compiler errors to subtle antipatterns to formatting drift. Each phase produces an explicit PASS, WARN, or FAIL with details. "It looks fine" is not a verification result; a table of statuses is. Critical failures (Phase 1 build, Phase 4 tests) short-circuit the pipeline because later phases cannot produce meaningful results on broken code.

The pipeline answers one question: "Is this code ready for review?"

PhaseToolWhat It CatchesCritical
1. Builddotnet buildCompilation errors, missing referencesYes
2. Diagnosticsget_diagnostics (MCP)New analyzer warnings, nullability issuesFAIL on new errors
3. Antipatternsdetect_antipatterns (MCP)async void, sync-over-async, DateTime.Now, moreNo
4. Testsdotnet testFailing tests, regressionsYes
5. Securitydotnet list package --vulnerable + scanSecrets, SQL injection, missing auth, vulnerable packagesFAIL on critical/high
6. Formatdotnet format --verify-no-changesStyle drift, formatting inconsistenciesNo
7. Diff Reviewgit diff analysisAccidental changes, debug leftovers, TODOsNo

When

  • After completing a feature, bug fix, or major refactor
  • Before creating a pull request -- non-negotiable, full pipeline
  • After merging upstream changes or updating dependencies
  • When the user says "verify", "check everything", "is this ready", "run all checks"
  • As the final step before marking a task complete

Which Phases to Run

Full pipeline is the default. For scoped changes, run a subset:

ScenarioPhasesNotes
Feature complete / Pre-PR / new endpointAll 7No shortcuts
Bug fix1, 2, 4Add a test first if none covers it
After refactor1, 2, 3, 4Correctness focus; add 5-7 if security-sensitive
Dependency update1, 4, 5Build, tests, vulnerability scan
Config or test-only change1, 4Build and test
Formatting only6Format check is sufficient

When in doubt, run all 7. Extra phases cost minutes; a missed security issue costs days of incident response. Never cherry-pick phases because a change "looks safe".

How

Phase 1: Build (CRITICAL -- short-circuits)

dotnet build --no-restore --verbosity quiet
  • If the build fails, STOP. Report errors and fix before continuing -- nothing downstream is meaningful on code that does not compile.
  • Capture the warning count even on PASS; new warnings are tracked in Phase 2.
  • Output: PASS (0 errors) or FAIL (with error list)

Phase 2: Diagnostics

Use the Roslyn MCP get_diagnostics tool, scoped to changed files/projects (full solution for cross-cutting changes). Compare against baseline -- flag only NEW warnings introduced by the current changes. Common findings: CS8600/CS8602 (nullability), CS0219 (unused variable).

Output: PASS (0 new) / WARN (new warnings) / FAIL (new errors). Treat new warnings as work -- today's CS8600 is next month's production NullReferenceException.

Phase 3: Antipattern Detection

Use the Roslyn MCP detect_antipatterns tool on changed files (full project for broad changes). Catches: async void, sync-over-async (.Result, .GetAwaiter().GetResult()), new HttpClient(), DateTime.Now/UtcNow instead of TimeProvider, broad catch (Exception), string interpolation in logging, missing CancellationToken, EF read queries without AsNoTracking.

Output: PASS (0 findings) / WARN (findings) / FAIL (critical antipatterns)

Phase 4: Tests (CRITICAL -- short-circuits)

dotnet test --no-build --verbosity quiet
  • Full suite, or scoped to affected test projects for large solutions.
  • Any failing test is a FAIL -- no exceptions. Stop and fix before later phases.
  • If no test project exists: SKIP with a recommendation to add tests.

Output: PASS (all green) or FAIL (failing test names + error messages)

Phase 5: Security Scan

dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive

Then review changed files for: hardcoded secrets/connection strings/API keys, SQL injection (raw SQL without parameterization), missing [Authorize] on endpoints that need it, permissive CORS, missing input validation, disabled HTTPS or certificate validation.

Output: PASS / WARN (medium/low findings) / FAIL (critical/high vulnerabilities)

Phase 6: Format Check

dotnet format --verify-no-changes --verbosity quiet

Reports drift without auto-fixing. To resolve, run dotnet format and include the changes in the commit. If no .editorconfig exists, note it as a recommendation.

Output: PASS / WARN (with file list)

Phase 7: Diff Review

Analyze git diff --stat and git diff (staged + unstaged) for:

  • Accidental or unrelated file changes (.vs/, bin/, obj/, .env, secrets)
  • Debug leftovers (Console.WriteLine, #if DEBUG in production paths)
  • Unresolved TODO/HACK/FIXME markers
  • Scope mismatch -- changes must match the task/PR description

Output: PASS (clean, matches intent) / WARN (with findings)

Fix-and-Retry Loop

A single pass rarely produces all-green. The loop is the point:

  1. IDENTIFY -- which phase failed, and the specific error
  2. FIX -- make the minimal change that resolves it
  3. RE-RUN -- from Phase 1 if the fix changed code; otherwise from the failed phase
  4. REPEAT -- until all phases pass, or an issue needs user input

Final Summary

## Verification Results

| Phase | Result | Details |
|-------|--------|---------|
| 1. Build | PASS | 0 errors, 0 warnings |
| 2. Diagnostics | PASS | 0 new diagnostics |
| 3. Antipatterns | WARN | 1 missing CancellationToken |
| 4. Tests | PASS | 47 passed, 0 failed |
| 5. Security | PASS | No findings |
| 6. Format | PASS | Clean |
| 7. Diff Review | WARN | 1 TODO marker found |

**Verdict: READY FOR REVIEW** (with 2 non-blocking warnings)

Verdicts: READY FOR REVIEW (all PASS, or only non-blocking WARNs) or NEEDS FIXES (any FAIL, with specific remediation steps). For pre-PR runs, include the verification report in the PR description.

Example

User: /verify

Claude: Running 7-phase verification pipeline...

Phase 1: Build ............ PASS (0 errors)
Phase 2: Diagnostics ...... PASS (0 new warnings)
Phase 3: Antipatterns ..... WARN
  - src/Features/Orders/CreateOrder.cs:42 -- DateTime.Now usage, use TimeProvider
Phase 4: Tests ............ PASS (23 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped)
Phase 5: Security ......... PASS
Phase 6: Format ........... PASS
Phase 7: Diff Review ...... PASS

Verdict: READY FOR REVIEW (1 non-blocking warning)

Recommendation: Replace DateTime.Now with TimeProvider on line 42 before
merging. Not blocking, but it will fail the antipattern check in CI.

Related

  • /build-fix -- Auto-fix build errors when Phase 1 fails
  • /code-review -- Multi-dimensional review once verification passes
  • /health-check -- Whole-project graded assessment (beyond this change set)