How to install generating-apex-test
npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/sf-skills --skill generating-apex-testFull instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from forcedotcom/sf-skills.
name: generating-apex-test description: "Generate and validate Apex test classes with TestDataFactory patterns, bulk testing (251+ records), mocking strategies, assertion best practices, and disciplined test-fix loops. Use this skill when creating new Apex test classes, improving test coverage, debugging and fixing failing Apex tests, running test execution and coverage analysis, or implementing testing patterns for triggers, services, controllers, batch jobs, queueables, and integrations. Triggers on *Test.cls, *_Test.cls files, sf apex run test workflows, coverage reports, test-fix loops. Do NOT trigger for production Apex code (use generating-apex) or Jest/LWC tests." metadata: version: "1.0"
Generating Apex Tests
Generate production-ready Apex test classes and run disciplined test-fix loops with coverage analysis.
Core Principles
- One behavior per method — each test method validates a single scenario. Separate positive, negative, and bulk tests. NEVER combine related-but-distinct inputs (e.g., null and empty) in one method — create
_NullInput_and_EmptyInput_as separate test methods - Bulkify tests — test with 251+ records to cross the 200-record trigger batch boundary. Batch Apex exception: in test context only one
execute()invocation runs, so setbatchSize >= testRecordCount. See references/async-testing.md - Isolate test data — every
@TestSetupmust delegate record creation to aTestDataFactoryclass. If none exists, create one first. Never build record lists inline in@TestSetup. Never rely on org data (SeeAllData=false) or hardcoded IDs. For duplicate rule handling, see references/test-data-factory.md - Assert meaningfully — use exact expected values computed from test data setup. NEVER use range assertions or approximate counts when the value is deterministic. Always include failure messages. See references/assertion-patterns.md
- Use
Assertclass only —Assert.areEqual,Assert.isTrue,Assert.fail, etc. Never use legacySystem.assert,System.assertEquals, orSystem.assertNotEquals - Mock external boundaries — use
HttpCalloutMockfor callouts,Test.setFixedSearchResultsfor SOSL, DML mock classes for database isolation. Design for testability via constructor injection. See references/mocking-patterns.md - Test negative paths — validate error handling and exception scenarios, not just happy paths
- Wrap with start/stop — pair
Test.startTest()withTest.stopTest()to reset governor limits and force async execution
Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest()
Always wrap the code under test in Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest():
- Resets governor limits so the test measures only the code under test
- Executes async operations synchronously (queueables, batch, future methods)
- Fires scheduled jobs immediately
Test Code Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| SOQL/DML inside loops | Query once before the loop; use Map<Id, SObject> for lookups |
| Magic numbers in assertions | Derive expected values from setup constants |
| God test class (>500 lines) | Split into multiple test classes by behavior area |
| Long test methods (>30 lines) | Extract Given/When/Then into helper methods |
Generic Exception catch | Catch the specific expected type (e.g., DmlException) |
Workflow
Step 1 — Gather Context
Before generating or fixing tests, identify:
- the target production class(es) under test
- existing test classes, test data factories, and setup helpers
- desired test scope (single class, specific methods, suite, or local tests)
- coverage threshold (75% minimum for deploy, 90%+ recommended)
- org alias when running tests against an org
Step 2 — Generate the Test Class
Apply the structure, naming conventions, and patterns from the asset templates and reference docs.
MANDATORY — File Deliverables: For every test class, create BOTH files:
{ClassName}Test.cls— the test class (use assets/test-class-template.cls as starting point){ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml— the metadata file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ApexClass xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
<apiVersion>66.0</apiVersion>
<status>Active</status>
</ApexClass>
If no TestDataFactory exists in the project, create TestDataFactory.cls + TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml using assets/test-data-factory-template.cls.
@TestSetup Example
@TestSetup
static void setupTestData() {
List<Account> accounts = TestDataFactory.createAccounts(251, true);
}
Test Method Structure
Use Given/When/Then:
@isTest
static void shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput() {
// Given
List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account];
// When
Test.startTest();
MyService.processAccounts(accounts);
Test.stopTest();
// Then
List<Account> updated = [SELECT Id, Status__c FROM Account];
Assert.areEqual(251, updated.size(), 'All accounts should be processed');
}
Negative Test — Exception Pattern
Use try/catch with Assert.fail to verify expected exceptions:
@isTest
static void shouldThrowException_WhenInvalidInput() {
// Given
List<Account> emptyList = new List<Account>();
// When/Then
Test.startTest();
try {
MyService.processAccounts(emptyList);
Assert.fail('Expected MyCustomException to be thrown');
} catch (MyCustomException e) {
Assert.isTrue(e.getMessage().contains('cannot be empty'),
'Exception message should indicate empty input');
}
Test.stopTest();
}
Naming Convention
should[ExpectedResult]_When[Scenario]:shouldSendNotification_WhenOpportunityClosedWon[SubjectOrAction]_[Scenario]_[ExpectedResult]:AccountUpdate_ChangeName_Success
Step 3 — Run Tests
Start narrow when debugging; widen after the fix is stable.
# Single test class
sf apex run test --class-names MyServiceTest --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>
# Specific test methods
sf apex run test --tests MyServiceTest.shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput --result-format human --target-org <alias>
# All local tests
sf apex run test --test-level RunLocalTests --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>
Step 4 — Analyze Results
Focus on:
- failing methods — exception types and stack traces
- uncovered lines and weak coverage areas
- whether failures indicate bad test data, brittle assertions, or broken production logic
Step 5 — Fix Loop
When tests fail, run a disciplined fix loop (max 3 iterations — stop and surface root cause if still failing):
- Read the failing test class and the class under test
- Identify root cause from error messages and stack traces
- Apply fix — adjust test data or assertions for test-side issues; delegate production code issues to the
generating-apexskill - Rerun the focused test before broader regression
- Repeat until all tests pass, iteration limit reached, or root cause requires design change
Step 6 — Validate Coverage
| Level | Coverage | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Production deploy | 75% minimum | Required by Salesforce |
| Recommended | 90%+ | Best practice target |
| Critical paths | 100% | Business-critical code |
Cover all paths: positive, negative/exception, bulk (251+ records), callout/async.
What to Test by Component
| Component | Key Test Scenarios |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Bulk insert/update/delete, recursion guard, field change detection |
| Service | Valid/invalid inputs, bulk operations, exception handling |
| Controller | Page load, action methods, view state |
| Batch | start/execute/finish, scope matching (batch size >= record count), Database.Stateful tracking, error handling, chaining (separate methods — finish() calling Database.executeBatch() throws UnexpectedException) |
| Queueable | Chaining (only first job runs in tests), bulkification, error handling, callout mocks before Test.startTest() |
| Callout | Success response, error response, timeout |
| Selector | Valid/null/empty inputs, bulk (251+), field population, sort order, WITH USER_MODE via System.runAs |
| Scheduled | Direct execution via execute(null), CRON registration via CronTrigger query |
| Platform Event | Test.enableChangeDataCapture(), Test.getEventBus().deliver(), verify subscriber side effects |
Output Expectations
Deliverables per test class:
{ClassName}Test.cls+{ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml(match API version of class under test; default66.0)TestDataFactory.cls+TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml(if not already present)
Reference Files
Load on demand for detailed patterns:
| Reference | When to use |
|---|---|
| references/test-data-factory.md | TestDataFactory patterns, field overrides, duplicate rule handling |
| references/assertion-patterns.md | Assertion best practices, anti-patterns, common pitfalls |
| references/mocking-patterns.md | HttpCalloutMock, DML mocking, StubProvider, SOSL, Email, Platform Events |
| references/async-testing.md | Batch, Queueable, Future, Scheduled job testing |
Related skills
More from forcedotcom/sf-skills and the wider catalog.
generating-apex
Primary Apex authoring skill for class generation, refactoring, and review. ALWAYS ACTIVATE when the user mentions Apex, .cls, triggers, or asks to create/refactor a class (service, selector, domain, batch, queueable, schedulable, invocable, DTO, utility, interface, abstract, exception, REST resource). Use this skill for requests involving SObject CRUD, mapping collections, fetching related records, scheduled jobs, batch jobs, trigger design, @AuraEnabled controllers, @RestResource endpoints, custom REST APIs, or code review of existing Apex.
generating-lwc-components
Lightning Web Components with PICKLES methodology and 165-point scoring. Use this skill when the user creates or edits LWC components, builds wire service patterns, or writes Jest tests for LWC. TRIGGER when: user creates/edits LWC components, touches lwc/**/*.js, .html, .css, .js-meta.xml files, or asks about wire service, SLDS, or Jest LWC tests. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Apex classes (use generating-apex), Aura components, or Visualforce.
generating-flow
Generate Salesforce Flows using the MCP tool execute_metadata_action. Use when the user asks to create, build, or generate a flow — including Screen, Autolaunched, Record-Triggered (before/after-save), Scheduled. Also trigger for flow-like requests such as \"when a record is created\", \"trigger daily at\", \"send an email when\", \"update the field when\", \"automate\", \"workflow\", or \"flow XML/metadata\". This is the only skill for Salesforce Flow generation.
querying-soql
SOQL query generation, optimization, and analysis with 100-point scoring. Use this skill when the user needs SOQL/SOSL authoring or optimization: natural-language-to-query generation, relationship queries, aggregates, query-plan analysis, and performance or safety improvements for Salesforce queries. TRIGGER when: user writes, optimizes, or debugs SOQL/SOSL queries, touches .soql files, or asks about relationship queries, aggregates, or query performance. DO NOT TRIGGER when: bulk data operations (use handling-sf-data), Apex DML logic (use generating-apex), or report/dashboard queries.
generating-custom-object
Use this skill when users need to create, generate, or validate Salesforce Custom Object metadata. Trigger when users mention custom objects, creating objects, object metadata, .object files, sharing models, name fields, or validation rules on objects. Also use when users say things like \"create a custom object\", \"generate object metadata\", \"set up an object for...\", or when they're troubleshooting object deployment errors especially around sharing models and Master-Detail relationships. Always use this skill for any custom object metadata work.
generating-custom-field
Use this skill when users need to create, generate, or validate Salesforce Custom Field metadata. Trigger when users mention custom fields, field types, Roll-up Summary fields, Master-Detail relationships, Lookup relationships, formula fields, picklists, or field metadata. Also use when users encounter field deployment errors, especially around Roll-up Summary format, Master-Detail constraints, or formula issues. Always use this skill for any custom field metadata work, field generation, or field troubleshooting.