web-design-reviewer
github/awesome-copilot
Visually inspect websites and fix design issues at the source code level.
What is web-design-reviewer?
This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues like responsive layout problems, accessibility gaps, and visual inconsistencies. Use it when you need to review UI quality and automatically apply fixes to HTML, CSS, and component files.
- Captures screenshots and analyzes websites across multiple viewports (mobile, tablet, desktop, wide)
- Detects layout issues including element overflow, misalignment, text clipping, and spacing inconsistencies
- Identifies responsive design problems, accessibility issues (contrast, focus states, alt text), and visual consistency gaps
- Locates problematic source files by searching class names, IDs, and component structures
- Applies fixes directly to source code while respecting existing code patterns and frameworks
- Performs before/after verification and regression testing to confirm fixes work without breaking other areas
How to install web-design-reviewer
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill web-design-reviewer- Target website must be running (local dev server, staging, or production)
- Browser automation capability for screenshot capture and page navigation
- Access to source code in the workspace when making fixes
How to use web-design-reviewer
- 1.Provide the URL of the website to review (e.g., http://localhost:3000)
- 2.Answer questions about the framework, styling method, and source code locations if not auto-detected
- 3.The skill will navigate the site, capture screenshots at multiple viewports, and analyze for design issues
- 4.Review the detected issues report with severity levels and affected elements
- 5.Approve fixes or provide guidance; the skill will update source files and re-verify changes
- 6.Receive a final report with before/after screenshots and recommendations
Use cases
- Review a React component library for responsive design issues across all breakpoints and apply CSS fixes
- Audit a Next.js website for accessibility problems like insufficient color contrast and missing focus states, then update styles
- Check a WordPress site for layout breakage on mobile devices and fix CSS in theme files
- Validate visual consistency across a Vue.js SPA by detecting font and color inconsistencies, then standardize them
- Inspect a static HTML site for element overflow and alignment issues, then correct the CSS
- Frontend developers building or maintaining websites
- Design system maintainers ensuring consistency across components
- QA engineers validating responsive design and accessibility
- Full-stack developers needing quick design issue diagnosis and fixes
- Teams using React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit, or WordPress
web-design-reviewer FAQ
Static sites (HTML/CSS/JS), SPA frameworks (React, Vue, Angular, Svelte), full-stack frameworks (Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit), CMS platforms (WordPress, Drupal), and any other web application.
It can review production sites for read-only inspection, but fixes require access to source code in your workspace.
Layout issues (overflow, overlap, alignment, spacing), responsive design problems, accessibility gaps (contrast, focus states, alt text), and visual consistency issues (fonts, colors, spacing).
It uses selector-based search (class names, IDs), component-based search, and file pattern filtering to locate CSS and component files, then applies minimal, targeted fixes.
The skill re-verifies after each fix and iterates up to 3 times per issue. If issues persist, it will consult you for guidance.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from github/awesome-copilot.
name: web-design-reviewer description: 'This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.'
Web Design Reviewer
This skill enables visual inspection and validation of website design quality, identifying and fixing issues at the source code level.
Scope of Application
- Static sites (HTML/CSS/JS)
- SPA frameworks such as React / Vue / Angular / Svelte
- Full-stack frameworks such as Next.js / Nuxt / SvelteKit
- CMS platforms such as WordPress / Drupal
- Any other web application
Prerequisites
Required
-
Target website must be running
- Local development server (e.g.,
http://localhost:3000) - Staging environment
- Production environment (for read-only reviews)
- Local development server (e.g.,
-
Browser automation must be available
- Screenshot capture
- Page navigation
- DOM information retrieval
-
Access to source code (when making fixes)
- Project must exist within the workspace
Workflow Overview
flowchart TD
A[Step 1: Information Gathering] --> B[Step 2: Visual Inspection]
B --> C[Step 3: Issue Fixing]
C --> D[Step 4: Re-verification]
D --> E{Issues Remaining?}
E -->|Yes| B
E -->|No| F[Completion Report]
Step 1: Information Gathering Phase
1.1 URL Confirmation
If the URL is not provided, ask the user:
Please provide the URL of the website to review (e.g.,
http://localhost:3000)
1.2 Understanding Project Structure
When making fixes, gather the following information:
| Item | Example Question |
|---|---|
| Framework | Are you using React / Vue / Next.js, etc.? |
| Styling Method | CSS / SCSS / Tailwind / CSS-in-JS, etc. |
| Source Location | Where are style files and components located? |
| Review Scope | Specific pages only or entire site? |
1.3 Automatic Project Detection
Attempt automatic detection from files in the workspace:
Detection targets:
├── package.json → Framework and dependencies
├── tsconfig.json → TypeScript usage
├── tailwind.config → Tailwind CSS
├── next.config → Next.js
├── vite.config → Vite
├── nuxt.config → Nuxt
└── src/ or app/ → Source directory
1.4 Identifying Styling Method
| Method | Detection | Edit Target |
|---|---|---|
| Pure CSS | *.css files | Global CSS or component CSS |
| SCSS/Sass | *.scss, *.sass | SCSS files |
| CSS Modules | *.module.css | Module CSS files |
| Tailwind CSS | tailwind.config.* | className in components |
| styled-components | styled. in code | JS/TS files |
| Emotion | @emotion/ imports | JS/TS files |
| CSS-in-JS (other) | Inline styles | JS/TS files |
Step 2: Visual Inspection Phase
2.1 Page Traversal
- Navigate to the specified URL
- Capture screenshots
- Retrieve DOM structure/snapshot (if possible)
- If additional pages exist, traverse through navigation
2.2 Inspection Items
Layout Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Element Overflow | Content overflows from parent element or viewport | High |
| Element Overlap | Unintended overlapping of elements | High |
| Alignment Issues | Grid or flex alignment problems | Medium |
| Inconsistent Spacing | Padding/margin inconsistencies | Medium |
| Text Clipping | Long text not handled properly | Medium |
Responsive Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Non-mobile Friendly | Layout breaks on small screens | High |
| Breakpoint Issues | Unnatural transitions when screen size changes | Medium |
| Touch Targets | Buttons too small on mobile | Medium |
Accessibility Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient Contrast | Low contrast ratio between text and background | High |
| No Focus State | Cannot determine state during keyboard navigation | High |
| Missing alt Text | No alternative text for images | Medium |
Visual Consistency
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Font Inconsistency | Mixed font families | Medium |
| Color Inconsistency | Non-unified brand colors | Medium |
| Spacing Inconsistency | Non-uniform spacing between similar elements | Low |
2.3 Viewport Testing (Responsive)
Test at the following viewports:
| Name | Width | Representative Device |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 375px | iPhone SE/12 mini |
| Tablet | 768px | iPad |
| Desktop | 1280px | Standard PC |
| Wide | 1920px | Large display |
Step 3: Issue Fixing Phase
3.1 Issue Prioritization
block-beta
columns 1
block:priority["Priority Matrix"]
P1["P1: Fix Immediately\n(Layout issues affecting functionality)"]
P2["P2: Fix Next\n(Visual issues degrading UX)"]
P3["P3: Fix If Possible\n(Minor visual inconsistencies)"]
end
3.2 Identifying Source Files
Identify source files from problematic elements:
-
Selector-based Search
- Search codebase by class name or ID
- Explore style definitions with
grep_search
-
Component-based Search
- Identify components from element text or structure
- Explore related files with
semantic_search
-
File Pattern Filtering
Style files: src/**/*.css, styles/**/* Components: src/components/**/* Pages: src/pages/**, app/**
3.3 Applying Fixes
Framework-specific Fix Guidelines
See references/framework-fixes.md for details.
Fix Principles
- Minimal Changes: Only make the minimum changes necessary to resolve the issue
- Respect Existing Patterns: Follow existing code style in the project
- Avoid Breaking Changes: Be careful not to affect other areas
- Add Comments: Add comments to explain the reason for fixes where appropriate
Step 4: Re-verification Phase
4.1 Post-fix Confirmation
- Reload browser (or wait for development server HMR)
- Capture screenshots of fixed areas
- Compare before and after
4.2 Regression Testing
- Verify that fixes haven't affected other areas
- Confirm responsive display is not broken
4.3 Iteration Decision
flowchart TD
A{Issues Remaining?}
A -->|Yes| B[Return to Step 2]
A -->|No| C[Proceed to Completion Report]
Iteration Limit: If more than 3 fix attempts are needed for a specific issue, consult the user
Output Format
Review Results Report
# Web Design Review Results
## Summary
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Target URL | {URL} |
| Framework | {Detected framework} |
| Styling | {CSS / Tailwind / etc.} |
| Tested Viewports | Desktop, Mobile |
| Issues Detected | {N} |
| Issues Fixed | {M} |
## Detected Issues
### [P1] {Issue Title}
- **Page**: {Page path}
- **Element**: {Selector or description}
- **Issue**: {Detailed description of the issue}
- **Fixed File**: `{File path}`
- **Fix Details**: {Description of changes}
- **Screenshot**: Before/After
### [P2] {Issue Title}
...
## Unfixed Issues (if any)
### {Issue Title}
- **Reason**: {Why it was not fixed/could not be fixed}
- **Recommended Action**: {Recommendations for user}
## Recommendations
- {Suggestions for future improvements}
Required Capabilities
| Capability | Description | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Web Page Navigation | Access URLs, page transitions | ✅ |
| Screenshot Capture | Page image capture | ✅ |
| Image Analysis | Visual issue detection | ✅ |
| DOM Retrieval | Page structure retrieval | Recommended |
| File Read/Write | Source code reading and editing | Required for fixes |
| Code Search | Code search within project | Required for fixes |
Reference Implementation
Implementation with Playwright MCP
Playwright MCP is recommended as the reference implementation for this skill.
| Capability | Playwright MCP Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Navigation | browser_navigate | Access URLs |
| Snapshot | browser_snapshot | Retrieve DOM structure |
| Screenshot | browser_take_screenshot | Images for visual inspection |
| Click | browser_click | Interact with interactive elements |
| Resize | browser_resize | Responsive testing |
| Console | browser_console_messages | Detect JS errors |
Configuration Example (MCP Server)
{
"mcpServers": {
"playwright": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@playwright/mcp@latest", "--caps=vision"]
}
}
}
Other Compatible Browser Automation Tools
| Tool | Features |
|---|---|
| Selenium | Broad browser support, multi-language support |
| Puppeteer | Chrome/Chromium focused, Node.js |
| Cypress | Easy integration with E2E testing |
| WebDriver BiDi | Standardized next-generation protocol |
The same workflow can be implemented with these tools. As long as they provide the necessary capabilities (navigation, screenshot, DOM retrieval), the choice of tool is flexible.
Best Practices
DO (Recommended)
- ✅ Always save screenshots before making fixes
- ✅ Fix one issue at a time and verify each
- ✅ Follow the project's existing code style
- ✅ Confirm with user before major changes
- ✅ Document fix details thoroughly
DON'T (Not Recommended)
- ❌ Large-scale refactoring without confirmation
- ❌ Ignoring design systems or brand guidelines
- ❌ Fixes that ignore performance
- ❌ Fixing multiple issues at once (difficult to verify)
Troubleshooting
Problem: Style files not found
- Check dependencies in
package.json - Consider the possibility of CSS-in-JS
- Consider CSS generated at build time
- Ask user about styling method
Problem: Fixes not reflected
- Check if development server HMR is working
- Clear browser cache
- Rebuild if project requires build
- Check CSS specificity issues
Problem: Fixes affecting other areas
- Rollback changes
- Use more specific selectors
- Consider using CSS Modules or scoped styles
- Consult user to confirm impact scope
Related skills
More from github/awesome-copilot and the wider catalog.
git-commit
Execute semantic git commits with conventional message analysis and intelligent staging.
excalidraw-diagram-generator
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions.
documentation-writer
Create structured technical documentation using the Diátaxis framework for tutorials, how-to guides, references, and explanations.
gh-cli
GitHub CLI comprehensive reference for repositories, issues, PRs, Actions, projects, releases, and all GitHub operations from the command line.
prd
Generate comprehensive Product Requirements Documents with executive summaries, user stories, technical specs, and risk analysis.
refactor
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior.