langchain4j-rag-implementation-patterns
giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit
RAG implementation patterns with LangChain4j for Java: document ingestion, embeddings, and semantic search.
What is langchain4j-rag-implementation-patterns?
Provides Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) implementation patterns using LangChain4j for Java. Generates document ingestion pipelines, embedding stores, vector search, and semantic search capabilities. Use when building chat-with-documents systems, document Q&A applications, AI assistants with knowledge bases, or semantic search over document repositories.
- Configure document ingestion pipelines with automatic segmentation and embedding generation
- Set up embedding stores and vector search for semantic retrieval
- Create RAG-enabled AI services with context retrieval and source attribution
- Implement hierarchical RAG with summary and chunk-level retrieval
- Support multi-domain assistants with knowledge base access
- Validate ingestion and retrieval with checkpoint testing
How to install langchain4j-rag-implementation-patterns
npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill langchain4j-rag-implementation-patterns- Java 11 or higher
- Spring Boot project setup
- OpenAI API key for embeddings and chat models
- Maven with pom.xml configuration
How to use langchain4j-rag-implementation-patterns
- 1.Add LangChain4j and OpenAI dependencies to pom.xml
- 2.Configure EmbeddingModel and EmbeddingStore beans in Spring configuration
- 3.Create DocumentIngestionService to load, split, and embed documents
- 4.Set up ContentRetriever with embedding store and filtering parameters
- 5.Define AI service interface with @SystemMessage and content retrieval
- 6.Call the service methods to answer questions with knowledge base context
Use cases
- Build chat-with-documents systems for PDFs, text files, or web pages
- Create document Q&A applications over company knowledge bases
- Implement semantic search over document repositories with relevance filtering
- Build domain-specific AI assistants with curated knowledge and source attribution
- Develop multi-domain assistants with access to technical docs, policies, and product information
- Java developers building knowledge-enhanced AI applications
- Backend engineers implementing document search and retrieval systems
- AI/ML engineers creating domain-specific assistants
- Teams building internal knowledge base systems with semantic search
langchain4j-rag-implementation-patterns FAQ
By default, text-embedding-3-small from OpenAI. You can configure alternative embedding models by changing the embeddingModel bean.
Use the validateIngestion() method with a test query, or check that embedding count matches segment count after ingestion.
Yes, LangChain4j supports multiple embedding stores. Replace InMemoryEmbeddingStore with alternatives like Pinecone, Weaviate, or Milvus by changing the bean configuration.
Use DocumentSplitters.recursive() with appropriate chunk size (500-1000 tokens) and overlap (20-50 tokens) to break documents into manageable segments before embedding.
Yes, metadata is preserved through the ingestion pipeline and can be included in system prompts to reference specific sources in responses.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit.
name: langchain4j-rag-implementation-patterns description: Provides Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) implementation patterns with LangChain4j for Java. Generates document ingestion pipelines, embedding stores, vector search, and semantic search capabilities. Use when building chat-with-documents systems, document Q&A over PDFs or text files, AI assistants with knowledge bases, semantic search over document repositories, or knowledge-enhanced AI applications with source attribution. allowed-tools: Read, Write, Bash
LangChain4j RAG Implementation Patterns
Overview
Implements RAG systems with LangChain4j: document ingestion pipelines, embedding stores, and vector search for chat-with-documents and knowledge-enhanced AI applications.
When to Use This Skill
- Building chat-with-documents systems or document Q&A over PDFs, text files, or web pages
- Creating AI assistants with access to company knowledge bases or external sources
- Implementing semantic search or hybrid search over document repositories
- Building domain-specific AI with curated knowledge and source attribution
Instructions
Initialize RAG Project
Create a new Spring Boot project with required dependencies:
pom.xml:
<dependency>
<groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
<artifactId>langchain4j-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
<version>1.8.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
<artifactId>langchain4j-open-ai</artifactId>
<version>1.8.0</version>
</dependency>
Setup Document Ingestion
Configure document loading and processing with validation:
Validation Checkpoint: After ingestion, verify embedding count matches segment count and test retrieval with a sample query.
@Configuration
public class RAGConfiguration {
@Bean
public EmbeddingModel embeddingModel() {
return OpenAiEmbeddingModel.builder()
.apiKey(System.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY"))
.modelName("text-embedding-3-small")
.build();
}
@Bean
public EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> embeddingStore() {
return new InMemoryEmbeddingStore<>();
}
}
Create document ingestion service:
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class DocumentIngestionService {
private final EmbeddingModel embeddingModel;
private final EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> embeddingStore;
public void ingestDocument(String filePath, Map<String, Object> metadata) {
Document document = FileSystemDocumentLoader.loadDocument(filePath);
document.metadata().putAll(metadata);
DocumentSplitter splitter = DocumentSplitters.recursive(
500, 50, new OpenAiTokenCountEstimator("text-embedding-3-small")
);
List<TextSegment> segments = splitter.split(document);
List<Embedding> embeddings = embeddingModel.embedAll(segments).content();
embeddingStore.addAll(embeddings, segments);
// Validation: verify embedding count matches segments
if (embeddings.size() != segments.size()) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Embedding count mismatch: expected " + segments.size() + ", got " + embeddings.size());
}
}
public boolean validateIngestion(String testQuery) {
// Validation: test retrieval with sample query
Embedding queryEmbedding = embeddingModel.embed(testQuery).content();
List<EmbeddingMatch<TextSegment>> results = embeddingStore.search(
EmbeddingSearchRequest.builder()
.queryEmbedding(queryEmbedding)
.maxResults(1)
.build()
).matches();
return !results.isEmpty();
}
}
Configure Content Retrieval
Setup content retrieval with filtering:
Validation Checkpoint: After configuration, test retrieval with a known query to verify embeddings are searchable.
@Configuration
public class ContentRetrieverConfiguration {
@Bean
public ContentRetriever contentRetriever(
EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> embeddingStore,
EmbeddingModel embeddingModel) {
return EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.builder()
.embeddingStore(embeddingStore)
.embeddingModel(embeddingModel)
.maxResults(5)
.minScore(0.7)
.build();
}
}
Create RAG-Enabled AI Service
Define AI service with context retrieval:
interface KnowledgeAssistant {
@SystemMessage("""
You are a knowledgeable assistant with access to a comprehensive knowledge base.
When answering questions:
1. Use the provided context from the knowledge base
2. If information is not in the context, clearly state this
3. Provide accurate, helpful responses
4. When possible, reference specific sources
5. If the context is insufficient, ask for clarification
""")
String answerQuestion(String question);
}
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class KnowledgeService {
private final KnowledgeAssistant assistant;
public KnowledgeService(ChatModel chatModel, ContentRetriever contentRetriever) {
this.assistant = AiServices.builder(KnowledgeAssistant.class)
.chatModel(chatModel)
.contentRetriever(contentRetriever)
.build();
}
public String answerQuestion(String question) {
return assistant.answerQuestion(question);
}
}
Examples
Basic Document Processing
public class BasicRAGExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
var embeddingStore = new InMemoryEmbeddingStore<TextSegment>();
var embeddingModel = OpenAiEmbeddingModel.builder()
.apiKey(System.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY"))
.modelName("text-embedding-3-small")
.build();
var ingestor = EmbeddingStoreIngestor.builder()
.embeddingModel(embeddingModel)
.embeddingStore(embeddingStore)
.build();
ingestor.ingest(Document.from("Spring Boot is a framework for building Java applications with minimal configuration."));
var retriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.builder()
.embeddingStore(embeddingStore)
.embeddingModel(embeddingModel)
.build();
}
}
Multi-Domain Assistant
interface MultiDomainAssistant {
@SystemMessage("""
You are an expert assistant with access to multiple knowledge domains:
- Technical documentation
- Company policies
- Product information
- Customer support guides
Tailor your response based on the type of question and available context.
Always indicate which domain the information comes from.
""")
String answerQuestion(@MemoryId String userId, String question);
}
Hierarchical RAG
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class HierarchicalRAGService {
private final EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> chunkStore;
private final EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> summaryStore;
private final EmbeddingModel embeddingModel;
public String performHierarchicalRetrieval(String query) {
List<EmbeddingMatch<TextSegment>> summaryMatches = searchSummaries(query);
List<TextSegment> relevantChunks = new ArrayList<>();
for (EmbeddingMatch<TextSegment> summaryMatch : summaryMatches) {
String documentId = summaryMatch.embedded().metadata().getString("documentId");
List<EmbeddingMatch<TextSegment>> chunkMatches = searchChunksInDocument(query, documentId);
chunkMatches.stream()
.map(EmbeddingMatch::embedded)
.forEach(relevantChunks::add);
}
return generateResponseWithChunks(query, relevantChunks);
}
}
Best Practices
Document Segmentation
- Use recursive splitting with 500-1000 token chunks for most applications
- Maintain 20-50 token overlap between chunks for context preservation
- Consider document structure (headings, paragraphs) when splitting
- Use token-aware splitters for optimal embedding generation
Metadata Strategy
- Include rich metadata for filtering and attribution:
- User and tenant identifiers for multi-tenancy
- Document type and category classification
- Creation and modification timestamps
- Version and author information
- Confidentiality and access level tags
Query Processing
- Implement query preprocessing and cleaning
- Consider query expansion for better recall
- Apply dynamic filtering based on user context
- Use re-ranking for improved result quality
Performance Optimization
- Cache embeddings for repeated queries
- Use batch embedding generation for bulk operations
- Implement pagination for large result sets
- Consider asynchronous processing for long operations
Common Patterns
Simple RAG Pipeline
@RequiredArgsConstructor
@Service
public class SimpleRAGPipeline {
private final EmbeddingModel embeddingModel;
private final EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> embeddingStore;
private final ChatModel chatModel;
public String answerQuestion(String question) {
Embedding queryEmbedding = embeddingModel.embed(question).content();
EmbeddingSearchRequest request = EmbeddingSearchRequest.builder()
.queryEmbedding(queryEmbedding)
.maxResults(3)
.build();
List<TextSegment> segments = embeddingStore.search(request).matches().stream()
.map(EmbeddingMatch::embedded)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
String context = segments.stream()
.map(TextSegment::text)
.collect(Collectors.joining("\n\n"));
return chatModel.generate(context + "\n\nQuestion: " + question + "\nAnswer:");
}
}
Hybrid Search (Vector + Keyword)
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class HybridSearchService {
private final EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> vectorStore;
private final FullTextSearchEngine keywordEngine;
private final EmbeddingModel embeddingModel;
public List<Content> hybridSearch(String query, int maxResults) {
// Vector search
List<Content> vectorResults = performVectorSearch(query, maxResults);
// Keyword search
List<Content> keywordResults = performKeywordSearch(query, maxResults);
// Combine and re-rank using RRF algorithm
return combineResults(vectorResults, keywordResults, maxResults);
}
}
Troubleshooting
Validation Failures
Embedding Count Mismatch: Thrown when segments != embeddings. Check splitter configuration and model availability.
Empty Retrieval Results: Call validateIngestion(testQuery) to verify embeddings are searchable. Check if document was ingested successfully.
Low Retrieval Scores: Verify minScore threshold (default 0.7) is not too high for your use case. Test with known queries.
Common Issues
Poor Retrieval Results
- Check document chunk size and overlap settings
- Verify embedding model compatibility
- Ensure metadata filters are not too restrictive
- Consider adding re-ranking step
- Run validation to confirm embeddings exist
Slow Performance
- Use cached embeddings for frequent queries
- Optimize database indexing for vector stores
- Implement pagination for large datasets
- Consider async processing for bulk operations
High Memory Usage
- Use disk-based embedding stores for large datasets
- Implement proper pagination and filtering
- Clean up unused embeddings periodically
- Monitor and optimize chunk sizes
Constraints and Warnings
- Embedding Model Costs: Generating embeddings for large document collections can be expensive; implement caching and batch processing.
- Vector Store Scalability: In-memory stores are suitable for development only; use persistent stores (Pinecone, Qdrant, Redis) for production.
- Chunk Size Trade-offs: Smaller chunks improve precision but lose context; larger chunks preserve context but may introduce noise.
- Stale Data: Cached embeddings become stale when source documents change; implement update strategies.
- Token Limits: RAG context windows have limits; typically 3-5 retrieved chunks fit within standard model limits.
- Hallucination Risk: RAG reduces but doesn't eliminate hallucinations; always validate critical responses against sources.
- Latency: Vector search and embedding generation add latency; consider async processing for real-time applications.
- Metadata Filtering: Overly restrictive filters may return no results; implement fallback strategies.
- Multi-tenancy: Ensure proper metadata isolation to prevent cross-tenant data leakage.
References
- API Reference - Complete API documentation and interfaces
- Examples - Production-ready examples and patterns
- Official LangChain4j Documentation
Related skills
More from giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and the wider catalog.

langchain4j-spring-boot-integration
Integrate LangChain4j with Spring Boot using declarative AI Services, auto-configuration, and dependency injection.

langchain4j-testing-strategies
Unit, integration, and mock testing patterns for LangChain4j Java AI services and RAG workflows.

langchain4j-tool-function-calling-patterns
Annotate Java methods as LLM-callable tools, register with AiServices, and handle execution errors in LangChain4j agents.

langchain4j-vector-stores-configuration
Configure LangChain4J vector stores for RAG applications with PostgreSQL, Pinecone, MongoDB, Milvus, and Neo4j.

learn
Provides autonomous project pattern learning by analyzing the codebase to discover development conventions, architectural patterns, and coding standards, then generates project rule files in .claude/rules/. Use when user asks to "learn from project", "extract project rules", "analyze codebase conventions", "discover project patterns", or wants to auto-generate Claude Code rules for the current project.

memory-md-management
Provides comprehensive memory file management capabilities including auditing, quality assessment, and targeted improvements for files such as CLAUDE.md. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, fix, maintain, or validate project memory files. Also triggers for "project memory optimization", "CLAUDE.md quality check", "documentation review", or when a project memory file needs to be created from scratch. This skill scans memory files, evaluates quality against standardized criteria, outputs detailed quality reports with scores and recommendations, then makes targeted updates with user approval.