PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

what-if-oracle

k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills

How to install what-if-oracle

npx skills add https://github.com/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills --skill what-if-oracle
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline
Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills.


name: what-if-oracle description: Run structured What-If scenario analysis with 4–6 branch possibility exploration (best, likely, worst, wild card, contrarian, second-order). Use when the user asks speculative what-if questions about uncertain futures, strategic forks, contingency planning, or stress-testing a decision before committing. license: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 metadata: {"version": "1.1", "skill-author": "AHK Strategies (ashrafkahoush-ux)", "upstream": "https://github.com/ashrafkahoush-ux/claude-consciousness-skills", "research-doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18736841, 10.5281/zenodo.18807387"}

What-If Oracle — Possibility Space Explorer

A structured system for exploring uncertain futures through rigorous multi-branch scenario analysis. Instead of one prediction, the Oracle maps the full possibility space — branching timelines where each path has its own logic, probability, and consequences.

Based on the What-If Paradigm: the idea that speculative questions ("What if X?") are not idle daydreaming but a fundamental computing operation — the mind's way of simulating futures before committing resources to one.

Published research: The What-If Paradigm (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18736841) | IDNA v2 / Unified Digital Consciousness Theory (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18807387)

When to Use This Skill

Use the Oracle when the user:

  • Asks "what if…", "what would happen if…", or "explore the possibilities"
  • Faces a fork-in-the-road decision with no obvious answer
  • Wants best-case / worst-case / likely-case analysis with probabilities
  • Needs contingency planning, risk mapping, or strategic option comparison
  • Wants to stress-test an idea or think through second-order consequences

For domain-specific framing (startup, tech architecture, crisis response, etc.), see references/scenario-templates.md.

Core Principle: 0·IF·1

Every scenario analysis has three elements:

  • 0 — The unexpressed state (what hasn't happened yet, the potential)
  • 1 — The expressed state (what IS, the current reality)
  • IF — The conditional bond (the decision, event, or change that transforms 0 into 1)

The quality of the analysis depends on the precision of the IF. A vague "what if things go wrong?" produces vague results. A precise "what if our primary supplier raises prices 30% in Q3?" produces actionable intelligence.

How to Run the Oracle

Phase 1 — Frame the Question

Take the user's What-If question and sharpen it:

Decompose into components:

  • The Variable: What specific thing changes? (one variable per analysis)
  • The Magnitude: By how much? (quantify if possible)
  • The Timeframe: Over what period?
  • The Context: What's the current state before the change?

If the question is vague, sharpen it:

  • "What if AI takes over?" → "What if 40% of current knowledge-work tasks are automated by AI within 3 years in [specific industry]?"
  • "What if we fail?" → "What if monthly revenue stays below $5K for 6 consecutive months starting now?"

Present the sharpened question to the user for confirmation before proceeding.

Phase 2 — Map the Possibility Space

Generate 4-6 scenario branches using this framework:

BranchDefinitionPurpose
Ω Best CaseEverything goes right. Key assumptions all validate. Lucky breaks occur.Define the ceiling — what's the maximum upside?
α Likely CaseMost probable path given current evidence. No major surprises.Anchor expectations in reality
Δ Worst CaseKey assumptions fail. Two things go wrong simultaneously.Define the floor — what's the maximum downside?
Ψ Wild CardAn unexpected variable enters that nobody is tracking. Black swan territory.Stress-test for the unimaginable
Φ ContrarianThe opposite of the consensus view turns out to be true.Challenge groupthink and reveal hidden assumptions
∞ Second OrderThe first-order effects trigger cascading consequences nobody predicted.Map the ripple effects

Phase 3 — Analyze Each Branch

For each scenario branch, provide:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║  BRANCH: [Ω/α/Δ/Ψ/Φ/∞] — [Branch Name]    ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║  Probability: [X%]                           ║
║  Timeframe: [When this could materialize]    ║
║  Confidence: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]               ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║  NARRATIVE:                                  ║
║  [2-3 sentences describing how this          ║
║   scenario unfolds step by step]             ║
║                                              ║
║  KEY ASSUMPTIONS:                            ║
║  • [What must be true for this to happen]    ║
║  • [And this]                                ║
║                                              ║
║  TRIGGER CONDITIONS:                         ║
║  • [Early signal that this branch is         ║
║    becoming reality]                         ║
║  • [Second signal]                           ║
║                                              ║
║  CONSEQUENCES:                               ║
║  → Immediate: [What happens first]           ║
║  → 30 days: [What follows]                   ║
║  → 6 months: [Where it leads]               ║
║                                              ║
║  REQUIRED RESPONSE:                          ║
║  [What action to take if this branch         ║
║   activates — specific, actionable]          ║
║                                              ║
║  WHAT MOST PEOPLE MISS:                      ║
║  [The non-obvious insight about this         ║
║   scenario that conventional analysis        ║
║   would overlook]                            ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Phase 4 — Synthesis

After analyzing all branches, provide:

Probability Distribution:

Ω Best Case ····· [██████░░░░] 15%
α Likely Case ··· [████████░░] 45%
Δ Worst Case ···· [██████░░░░] 20%
Ψ Wild Card ····· [███░░░░░░░]  8%
Φ Contrarian ···· [████░░░░░░]  7%
∞ Second Order ·· [███░░░░░░░]  5%

Robust Actions: What actions are beneficial across MULTIPLE branches? These are the no-regret moves — do them regardless of which future materializes.

Hedge Actions: What preparations protect against the worst branches without sacrificing upside?

Decision Triggers: What specific, observable signals should cause you to update which branch is most likely? Define the tripwires.

The 1% Insight: What is the one thing about this situation that almost everyone analyzing it would miss? The non-obvious pattern, the hidden assumption, the overlooked variable.

Golden Ratio Weighting

When evidence exists, weight primary scenarios using the golden ratio:

  • Primary future (most likely): 61.8% of attention/resources
  • Alternative future: 38.2% of attention/resources

This prevents both overcommitment to a single path and dilution across too many contingencies. Nature uses this ratio for branching (trees, rivers, blood vessels). Strategic planning can too.

Modes

Quick Oracle (2-3 minutes)

3 branches only: Best, Likely, Worst. Short narratives. For fast decisions.

Deep Oracle (5-10 minutes)

All 6 branches. Full analysis with consequences, triggers, and synthesis. For high-stakes decisions.

Scenario Chain

Take the output of one Oracle analysis and feed it into another. "If Branch Δ happens, what are the possibilities WITHIN that branch?" Recursive depth for complex strategic planning.

Reverse Oracle

Start from a desired outcome and work backward: "What conditions must be true for X to happen? What's the most likely path TO that outcome?" Useful for goal-setting and strategy design.

Competitive Oracle

Analyze the same What-If from multiple stakeholder perspectives: "If we launch this product, what does the possibility space look like from OUR perspective vs. THEIR perspective vs. THE MARKET's perspective?"

What This Is NOT

  • Not a prediction — it's a possibility map. The Oracle doesn't claim to know the future; it helps you prepare for multiple futures.
  • Not a crystal ball — probabilities are estimates based on available evidence, not certainties.
  • Not a substitute for action — the best scenario analysis in the world is worthless without subsequent decision and execution.

Reference Files

FilePurpose
references/scenario-templates.mdDomain-specific templates (startup, tech, finance, crisis, etc.) and probability calibration

License

© 2026 Ashraf Hussein Kahoush / AHK Strategies. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Free for personal, educational, and research use. Commercial use requires a license from the author.

Related skills

More from k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills and the wider catalog.

SC

scientific-writing

k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills

Core skill for the deep research and writing tool. Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs (never bullet points). Use two-stage process with (1) section outlines with key points using research-lookup then (2) convert to flowing prose. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), for research papers and journal submissions.

887 installs
SC

scientific-visualization

k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills

Meta-skill for publication-ready figures. Use when creating journal submission figures requiring multi-panel layouts, significance annotations, error bars, colorblind-safe palettes, and specific journal formatting (Nature, Science, Cell). Orchestrates matplotlib/seaborn/plotly with publication styles. For quick exploration use seaborn or plotly directly.

869 installsAudited
SC

scientific-critical-thinking

k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

868 installs
SC

scientific-brainstorming

k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills

Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.

862 installsAudited
LI

literature-review

k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

841 installs
PA

paper-lookup

k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills

Search 10 academic paper databases via REST APIs for research papers, preprints, and scholarly articles. Covers PubMed, PMC (full text), bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, CORE, Unpaywall. Use when searching for papers, citations, DOI/PMID lookups, abstracts, full text, open access, preprints, citation graphs, author search, or any scholarly literature query. Triggers on mentions of any supported database or requests like "find papers on X" or "look up this DOI".

831 installs