ccf-submission-checker
mikubaka88/ccfa-skills
Verify CCF paper submissions against venue rules, templates, page limits, anonymity, and artifact readiness.
What is ccf-submission-checker?
Checks conference submission packages for compliance with CCF venue-specific rules, formatting requirements, and reproducibility standards. Use this before final submission to catch template violations, page-limit overages, anonymity breaches, PDF build issues, and missing artifact documentation.
- Validate submission template, page limits, and anonymity rules for specific CCF venues and years
- Inspect LaTeX/PDF builds, metadata, fonts, and file structure for technical compliance
- Check artifact reproducibility: code, data, environment, seeds, hardware, and licensing
- Verify supplementary and camera-ready submission requirements
- Generate structured readiness report distinguishing pass, fail, and not-applicable items
How to install ccf-submission-checker
npx skills add https://github.com/mikubaka88/ccfa-skills --skill ccf-submission-checker- Access to the actual submission files (TeX source, PDF, supplementary materials)
- Knowledge of target CCF venue, year, and submission track
- Official venue submission guidelines or access to ccf-paper-writer venue guides
- LaTeX/PDF build tools if checking build logs and output
How to use ccf-submission-checker
- 1.Identify your target CCF venue, year, submission track, and submission mode (venue-format, package-check, artifact, or full)
- 2.Gather submission files: TeX source, compiled PDF, supplementary files, and artifact packages if applicable
- 3.Run the checker in the appropriate mode and provide the project directory path
- 4.Review the structured output report: pass/fail checklist, build issues, anonymity/page/font/metadata problems, and artifact gaps
- 5.Hand off to ccf-paper-writer for text rewrites, ccf-visual-composer for figure/table fixes, or ccf-experiment-designer for missing reproducibility experiments as needed
Use cases
- Pre-submission checklist for a conference paper to catch formatting and policy violations before upload
- Verify a PDF build produces correct page count and anonymity masking for a specific venue/year/track
- Audit artifact packages (code, data, models) for reproducibility completeness and documentation
- Check compliance with venue-specific supplementary material or camera-ready rules
- Validate metadata, fonts, and file organization before final conference submission
- Researchers and PhD students preparing conference submissions
- Paper authors verifying compliance with specific CCF venue requirements
- Teams releasing code and data artifacts alongside papers
- Conference organizers or program committees spot-checking submission readiness
ccf-submission-checker FAQ
No. This skill only checks and reports compliance gaps. Hand off to ccf-paper-writer for text compression, expansion, or polishing; to ccf-visual-composer for figure/table fixes; or to ccf-experiment-designer for reproducibility experiments.
The skill reads local venue guides and requires you to verify official rules for your specific venue/year/track. Always confirm the official submission guidelines on the conference website before final submission.
The skill proceeds with the files you supply and notes that project-state tracking is unavailable. You can still run all checks by providing the TeX, PDF, and artifact files directly.
Yes. In artifact or full mode, it builds a reproducibility checklist covering code, data, models, environment, seeds, hardware, licenses, access restrictions, and README documentation.
Hand off to ccf-paper-writer with the page-budget gap. Do not manually delete content; the writer will compress or restructure to fit while preserving substance.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from mikubaka88/ccfa-skills.
name: ccf-submission-checker description: "Check CCF venue rules and submission packages: template, pages, anonymity, PDF build, metadata, and reproducibility. Use for 投稿检查, 会议格式, page limits, and artifact readiness. Verify current official rules for the exact venue/year/track. Manuscript polishing belongs to ccf-paper-writer." metadata: ccf_skill_controls: handoff_question_mode: partial respect_session_denylists: true protect_idea_scope_in_writing: true private_material_safety: moderate shared_controls: ../ccf-common/references/
CCF Submission Checker
Family File Contract
Before writing, resolve the canonical output and one stable working directory per task/artifact. Reuse explicit or established task paths; otherwise use project-root ccfa-workfiles/<purpose>/<artifact-id>/, with source/, assets/, cache/, and build/ only as needed. Update current files in place; do not scatter intermediates or create iteration copies. Preserve inputs and required evidence; clean only verified disposable files created by this task. Use UTF-8 text I/O and check Chinese text after saving or rendering. For file work, apply artifact-contracts.md and reuse the same paths across skill transitions.
Collaboration Contract
Before specialist execution, read and apply ccf-humanization first, then ccf-common. At every handoff, reuse their applicable active rules or refresh missing/changed ones. Both preflights are required even without prose; detailed editing, experiment, and maintenance modes run only when relevant.
Keep one integrating owner and actively use other skills to resolve missing prerequisites or check material findings. Reuse applicable evidence; do not skip necessary groundwork to save tokens. Before finalizing, integrate contributions and verify affected results. Follow the conditional cooperation routes; avoid unrelated stages and duplicate reports.
Core Rule
Treat submission as a build, venue-policy, page-budget, and artifact-readiness gate. Use local venue guides for expected rules, then require official-policy freshness for final decisions. Do not rewrite paper content.
Modes
venue-format: template, page limit, anonymity, author block, supplementary and camera-ready rules.package-check: LaTeX/PDF build, metadata, fonts, page count, file structure, and submission checklist.artifact: code/data/model release plan, environment, seeds, hardware, licenses, artifact README, and reproducibility appendix.full: venue + package + artifact.
Workflow
- Identify venue/year/track, submission mode, project directory, TeX/PDF files, supplementary/artifact files, and deadline pressure.
- Read
ccfa.yamlwhen available. If absent, proceed with supplied files and state that project-state tracking is unavailable. - For venue questions, read
../ccf-paper-writer/references/venue-guides/index.mdand the specific venue guide before checking official freshness. - For package checks, inspect the actual TeX/PDF/build output, page accounting for the exact venue/year/track, anonymity, fonts, metadata, references, and applicable required forms. For ICLR 2027, apply the matched guide's year-specific template, stage-specific page budget, and AI-use statement/form checks; unconfirmed usage facts remain not verified. Read logs and affected pages; do not infer a successful build from file presence.
- For artifact checks, build a reproducibility checklist: code, data, models, environment, seeds, hardware, license, access restrictions, and README.
- Hand off to
ccf-paper-writerfor text/page rewrites: compression when over limit, substantive expansion when actual explanation is missing, and normal polishing when within budget. Hand off toccf-experiment-designerfor missing reproducibility experiments,ccf-visual-composerfor figure/table float order, caption placement, font, clipping, palette, or visual readability fixes, andccf-rebuttal-writerfor post-review response packaging.
Output Contract
Mode:
Venue and rule freshness:
Files checked:
Pass/fail checklist:
Build/package issues:
Anonymity/page/font/metadata issues:
Length budget status:
Artifact/reproducibility issues:
Required fixes:
Next CCFA owner:
Check Scope
Follow ../ccf-common/references/handoff-modes.md and ../ccf-common/references/task-modes.md. Run checks relevant to the requested mode and actual artifacts. Distinguish pass, fail, not applicable, and not verified; missing tools do not imply passing or failure. Record the official rule URL and the date checked. Reuse the project build configuration and place generated logs/previews in the established or shared task build directory. Update the canonical readiness report in place and distinguish old PDFs from successful current builds. Recheck only affected build surfaces after a fix. Underfilling a page budget alone is not a venue violation. Do not upload or submit files merely because a readiness check was requested.
Related skills
More from mikubaka88/ccfa-skills and the wider catalog.

ccf-visual-composer
Render and redesign scientific figures, diagrams, and visual tables with preserved data integrity and multiple export formats.

ccf-common
Shared preflight controls for CCFA specialist skills: routing, scope, prerequisites, evidence rules, and artifact contracts.

ccf-experiment-designer
Design CCF experiment protocols, evidence schemas, datasets, baselines, metrics, and ablations without fabricating results.

ccf-humanization
Preflight baseline for CCFA skills: direct reasoning, remove defensive framing, preserve evidence and uncertainty.

expect
Verify React/web code changes in a real browser before claiming completion.

improve-react
Audit a React codebase as a senior engineer, produce prioritized findings and implementation plans for other agents to execute.