PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

actualize

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

How to install actualize

npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill actualize
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline
Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit.


name: actualize description: "Reconcile the project's FPF state with recent repository changes"

Actualize Knowledge Base

This command is a core part of maintaining a living assurance case. It keeps your FPF knowledge base (.fpf/) in sync with the evolving reality of your project's codebase.

The command performs a three-part audit against recent git changes to surface potential context drift, stale evidence, and outdated decisions. This aligns with the Observe phase of the FPF Canonical Evolution Loop (B.4) and helps manage Epistemic Debt (B.3.4).

Action (Run-Time)

Step 1: Check Git Changes

Run git commands to identify changes since last actualization:

# Get current commit hash
git rev-parse HEAD

# Check for changes since last known baseline
# (Read .fpf/.baseline file if it exists, otherwise use initial commit)
git diff --name-only <baseline_commit> HEAD

# List all changed files
git diff --stat <baseline_commit> HEAD

Step 2: Analyze Report for Context Drift

  1. Review changed files for core project configuration:

    • package.json, go.mod, Cargo.toml, requirements.txt
    • Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml
    • .env.example, config files
  2. If configuration files changed:

    • Re-read project structure (README, config files)
    • Compare detected context with .fpf/context.md
    • Present diff to user
  3. Ask user if they want to update context.md

Step 3: Analyze Report for Evidence Staleness (Epistemic Debt)

  1. Read all evidence files in .fpf/evidence/
  2. Check carrier_ref field in each evidence file
  3. Cross-reference with changed files from git diff
  4. If a referenced file changed:
    • Flag the evidence as STALE
    • Note which hypothesis is affected

Step 4: Analyze Report for Decision Relevance

  1. Read all DRR files in .fpf/decisions/
  2. Trace back to source evidence and hypothesis files
  3. If foundational files changed:
    • Flag the DRR as POTENTIALLY OUTDATED

Step 5: Update Baseline

Create/update .fpf/.baseline file:

# FPF Actualization Baseline
# Last actualized: 2025-01-15T16:00:00Z
commit: abc123def456

Step 6: Present Findings

Output a structured report:

## Actualization Report

**Baseline**: abc123 (2025-01-10)
**Current**: def456 (2025-01-15)
**Files Changed**: 42

### Context Drift

The following configuration files have changed:
- package.json (+5 dependencies)
- Dockerfile (base image updated)

**Action Required**: Review and update `.fpf/context.md` if constraints have changed.

### Stale Evidence (3 items)

| Evidence | Hypothesis | Changed File |
|----------|------------|--------------|
| ev-benchmark-api | api-optimization | src/api/handler.ts |
| ev-test-auth | auth-module | src/auth/login.ts |
| ev-perf-db | db-indexing | migrations/002.sql |

**Action Required**: Re-validate to refresh evidence for affected hypotheses.

### Decisions to Review (1 item)

| DRR | Affected By |
|-----|-------------|
| DRR-2025-01-10-api-design | src/api/handler.ts changed |

**Action Required**: Consider re-evaluating decision via `/fpf:propose-hypotheses`.

### Summary

- Context drift detected: YES
- Stale evidence: 3 items
- Decisions to review: 1 item

Run `/fpf:decay` for detailed freshness management.

File: .fpf/.baseline

Track the last actualization point:

# FPF Actualization Baseline
last_actualized: 2025-01-15T16:00:00Z
commit: abc123def456789
branch: main

When to Run

  • Before starting new work: Ensure knowledge base is current
  • After major changes: Sync evidence with code changes
  • Weekly maintenance: Part of regular hygiene
  • Before decisions: Ensure evidence is still valid

Related skills

More from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit and the wider catalog.

PR

prompt-engineering

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Use this skill when you writing commands, hooks, skills for Agent, or prompts for sub agents or any other LLM interaction, including optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.

834 installsAudited
CO

context-engineering

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Understand the components, mechanics, and constraints of context in agent systems. Use when writing, editing, or optimizing commands, skills, or sub-agents prompts.

823 installs
TH

thought-based-reasoning

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Use when tackling complex reasoning tasks requiring step-by-step logic, multi-step arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, symbolic manipulation, or problems where simple prompting fails - provides comprehensive guide to Chain-of-Thought and related prompting techniques (Zero-shot CoT, Self-Consistency, Tree of Thoughts, Least-to-Most, ReAct, PAL, Reflexion) with templates, decision matrices, and research-backed patterns

810 installs
RE

reflect

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification

795 installsAudited
UP

update-docs

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Update and maintain project documentation for local code changes using multi-agent workflow with tech-writer agents. Covers docs/, READMEs, JSDoc, and API documentation.

785 installsAudited
MU

multi-agent-patterns

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Design multi-agent architectures for complex tasks. Use when single-agent context limits are exceeded, when tasks decompose naturally into subtasks, or when specializing agents improves quality.

779 installsAudited