PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

propose-hypotheses

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

How to install propose-hypotheses

npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill propose-hypotheses
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline
Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit.


name: propose-hypotheses description: Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision argument-hint: "[problem-statement]" allowed-tools: Task, Read, Write, Bash, AskUserQuestion

Propose Hypotheses Workflow

Execute the First Principles Framework (FPF) cycle: generate competing hypotheses, verify logic, validate evidence, audit trust, and produce a decision.

User Input

Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS

Workflow Execution

Step 1a: Create Directory Structure (Main Agent)

Create .fpf/ directory structure if it does not exist:

mkdir -p .fpf/{evidence,decisions,sessions,knowledge/{L0,L1,L2,invalid}}
touch .fpf/{evidence,decisions,sessions,knowledge/{L0,L1,L2,invalid}}/.gitkeep

Postcondition: .fpf/ directory scaffold exists.


Step 1b: Initialize Context (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Initialize FPF context"
  • Prompt:
    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/init-context.md and execute.
    
    Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
    
    **Write**: Context summary to `.fpf/context.md`**
    

Step 2: Generate Hypotheses (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Generate L0 hypotheses"
  • Prompt:
    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/generate-hypotheses.md and execute.
    
    Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
    Context: <summary from Step 1b>
    
    **Write**: List of hypothesis IDs and titles to `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`
    
    Reply with summary table in markdown format:
    
      | ID | Title | Kind | Scope |
      |----|-------|------|-------|
      | ... | ... | ... | ... |
    

Step 3: Present Summary (Main Agent)

  1. Read all L0 hypothesis files from .fpf/knowledge/L0/
  2. Present summary table from agent response.
  3. Ask user: "Would you like to add any hypotheses of your own? (yes/no)"

Step 4: Add User Hypothesis (FPF Agent, Conditional Loop)

Condition: User says yes to adding hypotheses.

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Add user hypothesis"
  • Prompt:
    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/add-user-hypothesis.md and execute.
    
    User Hypothesis Description: <get from user>
    
    **Write**: User hypothesis to `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`
    

Loop: Return to Step 3 after hypothesis is added.

Exit: When user says no or declines to add more.


Step 5: Verify Logic (Parallel Sub-Agents)

Condition: User finished adding hypotheses.

For EACH L0 hypothesis file in .fpf/knowledge/L0/, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Verify hypothesis: <hypothesis-id>"
  • Prompt:
    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/verify-logic.md and execute.
    
    Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
    Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L0/<hypothesis-id>.md
    
    **Move**: After you complete verification, move the file to `.fpf/knowledge/L1/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.
    

Wait for all agents, then check that files are moved to .fpf/knowledge/L1/ or .fpf/knowledge/invalid/.


Step 6: Validate Evidence (Parallel Sub-Agents)

For EACH L1 hypothesis file in .fpf/knowledge/L1/, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Validate hypothesis: <hypothesis-id>"
  • Prompt:
    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/validate-evidence.md and execute.
    
    Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
    Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L1/<hypothesis-id>.md
    
    **Move**: After you complete validation, move the file to `.fpf/knowledge/L2/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.
    

Wait for all agents, then check that files are moved to .fpf/knowledge/L2/ or .fpf/knowledge/invalid/.


Step 7: Audit Trust (Parallel Sub-Agents)

For EACH L2 hypothesis file in .fpf/knowledge/L2/, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Audit trust: <hypothesis-id>"
  • Prompt:
    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/audit-trust.md and execute.
    
    Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
    Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L2/<hypothesis-id>.md
    
    **Write**: Audit report to `.fpf/evidence/audit-{hypothesis-id}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md`
    
    **Reply**: with R_eff score and weakest link
    

Wait for all agents, then check that audit reports are created in .fpf/evidence/.


Step 8: Make Decision (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Create decision record"
  • Prompt:
    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/decide.md and execute.
    
    Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
    L2 Hypotheses Directory: .fpf/knowledge/L2/
    Audit Reports: .fpf/evidence/
    
    **Write**: Decision record to `.fpf/decisions/`
    
    **Reply**: with decision record summary in markdown format:
    
    | Hypothesis | R_eff | Weakest Link | Status |
    |------------|-------|--------------|--------|
    | ... | ... | ... | ... |
    
    **Recommended Decision**: <hypothesis title>
    
    **Rationale**: <brief explanation>
    

Wait for agent, then check that decision record is created in .fpf/decisions/.

Step 9: Present Final Summary (Main Agent)

  1. Read the DRR from .fpf/decisions/
  2. Present results from agent response.
  3. Present next steps:
    • Implement the selected hypothesis
    • Use /fpf:status to check FPF state
    • Use /fpf:actualize if codebase changes
  4. Ask user if he agree with the decision, if not launch fpf-agent at step 8 with instruction to modify the decision as user wants.

Completion

Workflow complete when:

  • .fpf/ directory structure exists
  • Context recorded in .fpf/context.md
  • Hypotheses generated, verified, validated, and audited
  • DRR created in .fpf/decisions/
  • Final summary presented to user

Artifacts Created:

  • .fpf/context.md - Problem context
  • .fpf/knowledge/L0/*.md - Initial hypotheses
  • .fpf/knowledge/L1/*.md - Verified hypotheses
  • .fpf/knowledge/L2/*.md - Validated hypotheses
  • .fpf/knowledge/invalid/*.md - Rejected hypotheses
  • .fpf/evidence/*.md - Evidence files
  • .fpf/decisions/*.md - Design Rationale Record

Related skills

More from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit and the wider catalog.

PR

prompt-engineering

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Use this skill when you writing commands, hooks, skills for Agent, or prompts for sub agents or any other LLM interaction, including optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.

834 installsAudited
CO

context-engineering

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Understand the components, mechanics, and constraints of context in agent systems. Use when writing, editing, or optimizing commands, skills, or sub-agents prompts.

823 installs
TH

thought-based-reasoning

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Use when tackling complex reasoning tasks requiring step-by-step logic, multi-step arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, symbolic manipulation, or problems where simple prompting fails - provides comprehensive guide to Chain-of-Thought and related prompting techniques (Zero-shot CoT, Self-Consistency, Tree of Thoughts, Least-to-Most, ReAct, PAL, Reflexion) with templates, decision matrices, and research-backed patterns

810 installs
RE

reflect

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification

795 installsAudited
UP

update-docs

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Update and maintain project documentation for local code changes using multi-agent workflow with tech-writer agents. Covers docs/, READMEs, JSDoc, and API documentation.

785 installsAudited
MU

multi-agent-patterns

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Design multi-agent architectures for complex tasks. Use when single-agent context limits are exceeded, when tasks decompose naturally into subtasks, or when specializing agents improves quality.

779 installsAudited