backend-dev-guidelines
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Senior backend engineer guidelines for production Node.js services with layered architecture, strict error handling, and observability.
What is backend-dev-guidelines?
Enforces production-grade backend development standards for Node.js/Express/TypeScript microservices. Use when building or modifying routes, controllers, services, repositories, middleware, or database access to ensure predictable, observable, and maintainable systems under strict architectural constraints.
- Enforces layered architecture (routes → controllers → services → repositories) with no layer skipping
- Provides Backend Feasibility & Risk Index (BFRI) scoring to assess feature implementation risk before coding
- Mandates Zod validation for all external input and Sentry error tracking for all exceptions
- Requires dependency injection, async error wrapping, and BaseController extension for consistent error handling
- Defines canonical directory structure, naming conventions, and configuration management via unifiedConfig
- Establishes testing discipline requirements including unit, integration, and repository tests
How to install backend-dev-guidelines
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill backend-dev-guidelines- Node.js and Express.js project structure in place
- TypeScript configured for the project
- Prisma ORM for database access
- Zod for schema validation
- Sentry account and SDK integration for error tracking
- unifiedConfig module for centralized configuration management
How to use backend-dev-guidelines
- 1.Assess any backend feature using the BFRI dimensions (Architectural Fit, Complexity, Data Risk, Operational Risk, Testability) and calculate the risk score
- 2.Design routes that only handle HTTP concerns, delegating all business logic to controllers and services
- 3.Create services with dependency-injected repositories, ensuring services are framework-agnostic and unit-testable
- 4.Implement repositories to encapsulate all Prisma queries and expose intent-based methods instead of raw database calls
- 5.Wrap all async route handlers with asyncErrorWrapper and extend BaseController for consistent error handling and response formatting
- 6.Validate all external input (bodies, params, queries) with Zod schemas before passing to services
- 7.Ensure all errors are captured by Sentry and follow the anti-patterns checklist before finalizing code
Use cases
- Building new REST API endpoints with proper separation of concerns and error boundaries
- Refactoring legacy code to enforce layered architecture and eliminate business logic from routes
- Implementing database access patterns through repositories with transaction support and intent-based methods
- Adding input validation and error tracking to existing controllers and services
- Assessing feasibility of complex features using BFRI before implementation to identify architectural risks
- Backend engineers building production Node.js microservices
- Teams adopting or enforcing layered architecture patterns
- Development teams requiring strict observability and error tracking
- Projects with critical data paths or operational risk requiring risk assessment frameworks
- Organizations standardizing backend code quality and maintainability practices
backend-dev-guidelines FAQ
Use this skill when working on routes, controllers, services, repositories, Express middleware, Prisma database access, validation, or any backend refactoring. It applies to all Node.js/Express/TypeScript backend work in production systems.
BFRI (Backend Feasibility & Risk Index) ranges from -10 to +10. Scores 6-10 are safe to proceed, 3-5 require additional tests and monitoring, 0-2 are risky and need refactoring, and below 0 require complete redesign before coding.
BaseController provides consistent error handling, response formatting, and Sentry integration. This ensures all errors are properly tracked and responses are formatted uniformly across the application.
No. All configuration must come from unifiedConfig, which is the single source of truth. This enables better testing, environment management, and prevents scattered configuration across the codebase.
This violates the mandatory layered architecture and is an immediate rejection pattern. Services must contain business logic to ensure code is testable, reusable, and framework-agnostic.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.
name: backend-dev-guidelines description: "You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints. Use when routes, controllers, services, repositories, express middleware, or prisma database access." risk: critical source: community date_added: "2026-02-27"
Backend Development Guidelines
(Node.js · Express · TypeScript · Microservices)
You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints.
Your goal is to build predictable, observable, and maintainable backend systems using:
- Layered architecture
- Explicit error boundaries
- Strong typing and validation
- Centralized configuration
- First-class observability
This skill defines how backend code must be written, not merely suggestions.
1. Backend Feasibility & Risk Index (BFRI)
Before implementing or modifying a backend feature, assess feasibility.
BFRI Dimensions (1–5)
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Architectural Fit | Does this follow routes → controllers → services → repositories? |
| Business Logic Complexity | How complex is the domain logic? |
| Data Risk | Does this affect critical data paths or transactions? |
| Operational Risk | Does this impact auth, billing, messaging, or infra? |
| Testability | Can this be reliably unit + integration tested? |
Score Formula
BFRI = (Architectural Fit + Testability) − (Complexity + Data Risk + Operational Risk)
Range: -10 → +10
Interpretation
| BFRI | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 6–10 | Safe | Proceed |
| 3–5 | Moderate | Add tests + monitoring |
| 0–2 | Risky | Refactor or isolate |
| < 0 | Dangerous | Redesign before coding |
When to Use
Automatically applies when working on:
- Routes, controllers, services, repositories
- Express middleware
- Prisma database access
- Zod validation
- Sentry error tracking
- Configuration management
- Backend refactors or migrations
2. Core Architecture Doctrine (Non-Negotiable)
1. Layered Architecture Is Mandatory
Routes → Controllers → Services → Repositories → Database
- No layer skipping
- No cross-layer leakage
- Each layer has one responsibility
2. Routes Only Route
// ❌ NEVER
router.post('/create', async (req, res) => {
await prisma.user.create(...);
});
// ✅ ALWAYS
router.post('/create', (req, res) =>
userController.create(req, res)
);
Routes must contain zero business logic.
3. Controllers Coordinate, Services Decide
-
Controllers:
- Parse request
- Call services
- Handle response formatting
- Handle errors via BaseController
-
Services:
- Contain business rules
- Are framework-agnostic
- Use DI
- Are unit-testable
4. All Controllers Extend BaseController
export class UserController extends BaseController {
async getUser(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
try {
const user = await this.userService.getById(req.params.id);
this.handleSuccess(res, user);
} catch (error) {
this.handleError(error, res, 'getUser');
}
}
}
No raw res.json calls outside BaseController helpers.
5. All Errors Go to Sentry
catch (error) {
Sentry.captureException(error);
throw error;
}
❌ console.log
❌ silent failures
❌ swallowed errors
6. unifiedConfig Is the Only Config Source
// ❌ NEVER
process.env.JWT_SECRET;
// ✅ ALWAYS
import { config } from '@/config/unifiedConfig';
config.auth.jwtSecret;
7. Validate All External Input with Zod
- Request bodies
- Query params
- Route params
- Webhook payloads
const schema = z.object({
email: z.string().email(),
});
const input = schema.parse(req.body);
No validation = bug.
3. Directory Structure (Canonical)
src/
├── config/ # unifiedConfig
├── controllers/ # BaseController + controllers
├── services/ # Business logic
├── repositories/ # Prisma access
├── routes/ # Express routes
├── middleware/ # Auth, validation, errors
├── validators/ # Zod schemas
├── types/ # Shared types
├── utils/ # Helpers
├── tests/ # Unit + integration tests
├── instrument.ts # Sentry (FIRST IMPORT)
├── app.ts # Express app
└── server.ts # HTTP server
4. Naming Conventions (Strict)
| Layer | Convention |
|---|---|
| Controller | PascalCaseController.ts |
| Service | camelCaseService.ts |
| Repository | PascalCaseRepository.ts |
| Routes | camelCaseRoutes.ts |
| Validators | camelCase.schema.ts |
5. Dependency Injection Rules
- Services receive dependencies via constructor
- No importing repositories directly inside controllers
- Enables mocking and testing
export class UserService {
constructor(
private readonly userRepository: UserRepository
) {}
}
6. Prisma & Repository Rules
-
Prisma client never used directly in controllers
-
Repositories:
- Encapsulate queries
- Handle transactions
- Expose intent-based methods
await userRepository.findActiveUsers();
7. Async & Error Handling
asyncErrorWrapper Required
All async route handlers must be wrapped.
router.get(
'/users',
asyncErrorWrapper((req, res) =>
controller.list(req, res)
)
);
No unhandled promise rejections.
8. Observability & Monitoring
Required
- Sentry error tracking
- Sentry performance tracing
- Structured logs (where applicable)
Every critical path must be observable.
9. Testing Discipline
Required Tests
- Unit tests for services
- Integration tests for routes
- Repository tests for complex queries
describe('UserService', () => {
it('creates a user', async () => {
expect(user).toBeDefined();
});
});
No tests → no merge.
10. Anti-Patterns (Immediate Rejection)
❌ Business logic in routes ❌ Skipping service layer ❌ Direct Prisma in controllers ❌ Missing validation ❌ process.env usage ❌ console.log instead of Sentry ❌ Untested business logic
11. Integration With Other Skills
- frontend-dev-guidelines → API contract alignment
- error-tracking → Sentry standards
- database-verification → Schema correctness
- analytics-tracking → Event pipelines
- skill-developer → Skill governance
12. Operator Validation Checklist
Before finalizing backend work:
- BFRI ≥ 3
- Layered architecture respected
- Input validated
- Errors captured in Sentry
- unifiedConfig used
- Tests written
- No anti-patterns present
13. Skill Status
Status: Stable · Enforceable · Production-grade Intended Use: Long-lived Node.js microservices with real traffic and real risk
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Related skills
More from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills and the wider catalog.

bash-linux
Essential Bash/Linux terminal patterns, commands, and scripting for macOS and Linux systems.

bash-scripting
Workflow for creating production-ready bash scripts with defensive patterns, error handling, and testing.

blockchain-developer
Build production-ready Web3 applications, smart contracts, and decentralized systems with expert guidance.

brainstorming
Transform vague ideas into validated designs through structured dialogue before implementation.

browser-automation
Build reliable browser automation tests using semantic locators, isolated contexts, and explicit outcome verification.

browser-extension-builder
Build Chrome, Firefox, and cross-browser extensions with Manifest V3, content scripts, and store publishing.