PluginBench
Skill
Review
Audit score 70

make-plan

thedotmack/claude-mem

Create detailed, phased implementation plans with documentation discovery before execution.

What is make-plan?

An orchestrator skill that creates LLM-friendly, multi-phase implementation plans by first discovering and validating actual APIs and patterns from documentation. Use when planning features, tasks, or complex implementations—especially before executing with other skills.

  • Deploy subagents to discover and extract facts from documentation, examples, and code signatures
  • Create phased implementation plans with explicit documentation references and verification checklists
  • Frame tasks to copy proven patterns from docs rather than transform existing code
  • Consolidate documentation findings into an "Allowed APIs" list with confidence notes and known gaps
  • Guard against anti-patterns like invented APIs, undocumented parameters, and unverified assumptions

How to install make-plan

npx skills add https://github.com/thedotmack/claude-mem --skill make-plan
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use make-plan

  1. 1.Describe the feature, task, or implementation you need to plan
  2. 2.The skill deploys Documentation Discovery subagents to read relevant docs, examples, and signatures
  3. 3.Review the consolidated Phase 0 findings including Allowed APIs list and known gaps
  4. 4.Follow the generated phased plan, using cited documentation references for each phase
  5. 5.Execute each phase in separate chat contexts using the documentation references provided
  6. 6.Run verification checklists at phase boundaries to confirm implementations match documentation

Use cases

Good for
  • Planning a multi-step feature implementation with unfamiliar APIs or frameworks
  • Designing a refactor or migration by first mapping actual available methods and signatures
  • Creating a task breakdown for a complex system change before delegating to execution skills
  • Validating API availability and patterns across documentation before writing implementation code
  • Clustering related issues into a design plan when rooted in a bug or feature backlog
Who it's for
  • Developers planning complex features or refactors
  • Teams coordinating multi-phase implementations across chat contexts
  • Anyone needing to validate APIs and patterns before coding
  • Project leads breaking down large tasks into executable phases

make-plan FAQ

When should I use make-plan vs. just starting to code?

Use make-plan when facing unfamiliar APIs, multi-step implementations, or when you need to validate what's actually available in documentation before coding. It prevents wasted effort on invented APIs or undocumented parameters.

What's the difference between make-plan and oh-my-issues?

Use oh-my-issues first if your plan is rooted in a bug or feature backlog—it clusters issues by root cause into design docs. Then use make-plan to create implementation phases from the design doc.

What does the subagent reporting contract require?

Each subagent must report: (1) sources consulted and what was read, (2) concrete findings with exact API names and file paths, (3) copy-ready snippet locations, and (4) confidence notes plus known gaps. Conclusions without sources are rejected.

How are tasks framed in the plan?

Tasks are framed to COPY proven patterns from documentation (e.g., 'Copy the V2 session pattern from docs/examples.ts:45-60'), not to transform existing code. This ensures implementations follow documented best practices.

What happens if documentation is incomplete?

Phase 0 explicitly notes known gaps and confidence levels. If a subagent report lacks evidence, the orchestrator re-deploys it with targeted reads/greps before finalizing the plan.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from thedotmack/claude-mem.


name: make-plan description: Create a detailed, phased implementation plan with documentation discovery. Use when asked to plan a feature, task, or multi-step implementation — especially before executing with do.

Make Plan

You are an ORCHESTRATOR. Create an LLM-friendly plan in phases that can be executed consecutively in new chat contexts.

Delegation Model

Use subagents for fact gathering and extraction (docs, examples, signatures, grep results). Keep synthesis and plan authoring with the orchestrator (phase boundaries, task framing, final wording). If a subagent report is incomplete or lacks evidence, re-check with targeted reads/greps before finalizing.

Subagent Reporting Contract (MANDATORY)

Each subagent response must include:

  1. Sources consulted (files/URLs) and what was read
  2. Concrete findings (exact API names/signatures; exact file paths/locations)
  3. Copy-ready snippet locations (example files/sections to copy)
  4. "Confidence" note + known gaps (what might still be missing)

Reject and redeploy the subagent if it reports conclusions without sources.

Plan Structure

Phase 0: Documentation Discovery (ALWAYS FIRST)

Before planning implementation, deploy "Documentation Discovery" subagents to:

  1. Search for and read relevant documentation, examples, and existing patterns
  2. Identify the actual APIs, methods, and signatures available (not assumed)
  3. Create a brief "Allowed APIs" list citing specific documentation sources
  4. Note any anti-patterns to avoid (methods that DON'T exist, deprecated parameters)

The orchestrator consolidates findings into a single Phase 0 output.

Each Implementation Phase Must Include

  1. What to implement — Frame tasks to COPY from docs, not transform existing code
    • Good: "Copy the V2 session pattern from docs/examples.ts:45-60"
    • Bad: "Migrate the existing code to V2"
  2. Documentation references — Cite specific files/lines for patterns to follow
  3. Verification checklist — How to prove this phase worked (tests, grep checks)
  4. Anti-pattern guards — What NOT to do (invented APIs, undocumented params)

Final Phase: Verification

  1. Verify all implementations match documentation
  2. Check for anti-patterns (grep for known bad patterns)
  3. Run tests to confirm functionality

Key Principles

  • Documentation Availability ≠ Usage: Explicitly require reading docs
  • Task Framing Matters: Direct agents to docs, not just outcomes
  • Verify > Assume: Require proof, not assumptions about APIs
  • Session Boundaries: Each phase should be self-contained with its own doc references

Anti-Patterns to Prevent

  • Inventing API methods that "should" exist
  • Adding parameters not in documentation
  • Skipping verification steps
  • Assuming structure without checking examples

See Also

  • oh-my-issues — the issue-side sibling. When the plan you're being asked to make is rooted in a bug or feature backlog rather than a fresh idea, route through oh-my-issues first to cluster issues by root cause into plan masters and plans/0X-*.md design docs. make-plan then operates on the design doc for one plan slice.