PluginBench
Skill
Review
Audit score 70

futures-position-sizer

tradermonty/claude-trading-skills

Calculate futures contract position sizes from direction, entry, and stop-loss using verified per-symbol specs.

What is futures-position-sizer?

Converts a direction, entry price, and stop-loss into a contract count for futures trading, using verified contract specifications (multiplier, tick size, tick value) for 23 core markets. Use this after confirming a trade setup or when sizing any futures position (ES, NQ, ZB, GC, CL, etc.) based on account risk.

  • Calculate contract count from direction, entry, stop-loss, and account risk percentage
  • Support two sizing modes: explicit (--symbol --direction --entry --stop) or gate handoff from contrarian-setup-gate
  • Verify prices against per-symbol tick grids (catches off-grid bond prices like 110.16 vs 110.50)
  • Use exact rational arithmetic to guarantee risk budget compliance (never exceeds risk %)
  • Output JSON and/or text reports with full risk math and contract spec details
  • List verified contract specs for 23 core futures markets (ES, NQ, ZB, ZF, ZT, ZN, GC, CL, SI, HG, NG, 6E, 6A, 6B, 6J, 6S, VX, BT, YM, MNQ, MES, M2K, RTY)

How to install futures-position-sizer

npx skills add https://github.com/tradermonty/claude-trading-skills --skill futures-position-sizer
Prerequisites
  • Python 3.9+ (standard library only, no external dependencies)
  • A direction, entry price, and stop-loss (mode A), or a contrarian-setup-gate JSON report with setup_status: READY_FOR_PLAN (mode B)
  • For unlisted symbols: multiplier, tick size, and quote currency
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use futures-position-sizer

  1. 1.Run mode A (explicit) with --symbol, --direction, --entry, --stop, --account-size, --risk-pct, and --output-dir
  2. 2.Or run mode B (gate handoff) with --gate-json, --entry, --account-size, --risk-pct, and --output-dir
  3. 3.Read the sizing_status field: SIZED means contracts >= 1; NO_TRADE means the trade cannot be sized (check no_trade_reason)
  4. 4.Review warnings for audit-worthy conditions (risk above 2%, off-grid prices)
  5. 5.Check the contract_spec and risk math (risk_per_contract_usd, total_risk_usd, risk_pct_of_account) before executing

Use cases

Good for
  • Size an ES long position with entry 5000.25 and stop 4980.00 on a $100k account risking 1%
  • Convert a contrarian-setup-gate READY_FOR_PLAN report into a contract count with a user-supplied entry price
  • Verify that a bond price (e.g., ZB 110'16) is on the correct 1/32 tick grid before sizing
  • Check the multiplier and tick value for a symbol to understand dollar-per-point risk
  • Confirm position sizing math when a trade setup is confirmed but contract count is uncertain
Who it's for
  • Futures traders sizing individual positions
  • Algorithmic trading systems integrating position sizing into trade workflows
  • Risk managers validating contract counts before execution
  • Traders using contrarian-setup-gate for trade confirmation

futures-position-sizer FAQ

What is the difference between this skill and position-sizer?

position-sizer sizes equity shares; futures-position-sizer sizes futures contracts. Futures use multipliers and tick values (e.g., ES $50/point, NQ $20/point) instead of share prices, so the math is entirely different.

Can I use this skill without a stop-loss?

No. The skill requires an explicit stop-loss in both modes. Mode A rejects missing --stop; mode B refuses to size until the gate reports READY_FOR_PLAN with a valid invalidation_level.

What does 'off_tick_grid' warning mean?

The price you entered is not exactly on the symbol's tick grid. For bonds (ZB, ZF, ZN, ZT), this is usually a typo (e.g., 110.16 instead of 110.50). For other symbols, it may be a mid-quote and is only a warning, not a rejection.

How do I use the gate handoff mode?

Pass --gate-json with the path to a contrarian-setup-gate JSON report and --entry with your entry price. The skill extracts direction and stop from the gate's READY_FOR_PLAN section. Do not pass --direction or --stop alongside --gate-json.

What if the result is NO_TRADE with risk_below_one_contract?

Your account cannot afford one contract at the given risk percentage and stop distance. Widen the stop, increase risk %, increase account size, or skip the trade.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from tradermonty/claude-trading-skills.


name: futures-position-sizer description: Calculate contract-based futures position sizes from a direction, entry, and stop-loss, using verified per-symbol contract specs (multiplier, tick size, tick value). Use when the user asks how many futures contracts to trade, wants to size a futures position (ES, NQ, ZB, GC, CL, 6E/E6, VX, BT, ...), or is handing off a contrarian-setup-gate READY_FOR_PLAN direction/invalidation_level for sizing. Pure, offline calculation -- no API keys, no network.

Futures Position Sizer

Overview

Shapiro pipeline step 4: convert a direction, entry price, and stop-loss into a contract count, given an account risk budget and a verified contract spec (multiplier, tick size, tick value). This is a NEW, separate skill from position-sizer -- futures contracts are leveraged, multiplier-based instruments with wildly different dollar-per-point values (a $0.25 move is $12.50 on ES but $5.00 on NQ and $31.25 on ZB); reusing the equity share-count sizer for futures would silently produce wrong position sizes.

Two ways to size a trade:

  • Mode A (explicit): supply --symbol --direction --entry --stop directly.
  • Mode B (gate handoff): supply --gate-json <contrarian-setup-gate report> --entry. Direction and stop (the gate's invalidation_level) come from the gate's READY_FOR_PLAN report -- the sizer never sizes a setup the gate has not confirmed as READY, and never accepts an explicit --direction/--stop alongside --gate-json (the gate is authoritative when provided).

--entry is ALWAYS required, in both modes -- neither this skill nor the gate ever derives an entry price; the operator supplies it.

When to Use

  • After contrarian-setup-gate reaches READY_FOR_PLAN and you need a contract count for the confirmed direction and stop
  • User asks "how many ES/NQ/GC/CL/... contracts should I trade?"
  • User has a futures trade idea with a known entry and stop and wants risk-based sizing
  • User wants to check the verified contract spec (multiplier/tick size/tick value) for a symbol before sizing (--list-specs)

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+, standard library only -- no API keys, fully offline
  • A direction, entry, and stop (mode A), or a contrarian-setup-gate JSON report with setup_status: READY_FOR_PLAN (mode B)
  • For a symbol outside the verified 23-market core table: its multiplier, tick size, and quote currency (all three, together)

Workflow

Step 1: Size the Position

Mode A -- explicit:

python3 skills/futures-position-sizer/scripts/futures_position_sizer.py \
  --symbol ES --direction LONG --entry 5000.25 --stop 4980.00 \
  --account-size 100000 --risk-pct 1.0 \
  --output-dir reports/ --format both

Mode B -- gate handoff:

python3 skills/futures-position-sizer/scripts/futures_position_sizer.py \
  --gate-json reports/contrarian_setup_gate_B6_2026-07-15.json \
  --entry 1.3400 \
  --account-size 100000 --risk-pct 1.0 \
  --output-dir reports/ --format both

--symbol may be omitted in mode B -- it is taken from the gate report. If both are given, they must match (gate_symbol_mismatch otherwise). --direction/--stop are rejected alongside --gate-json (usage error, exit 2) -- pass one mode or the other, never both.

Step 2: Read the Result

sizing_statusMeaning
SIZEDcontracts >= 1; total_risk_usd/risk_pct_of_account are the actual risk taken
NO_TRADENever a crash -- always carries no_trade_reason. See the reason glossary below

A NO_TRADE result from risk_below_one_contract still reports the full risk math (risk per contract, risk budget, stop distance) -- the account simply cannot afford one contract at this risk percentage and stop distance; widen the stop, increase risk %, or skip the trade.

Step 3: Check Warnings

warnings (top-level list) never blocks sizing -- it flags audit-worthy conditions: risk_pct_above_2 (risk above the 2% guideline), off_tick_grid_entry/off_tick_grid_stop (a non-bond symbol's price is not exactly on the tick grid -- legitimate for a mid-quote, but worth a second look).

Step 4: Inspect the Verified Contract Spec Table

python3 skills/futures-position-sizer/scripts/futures_position_sizer.py --list-specs

Prints the full 23-market core table (multiplier, tick size, tick value, currency, exchange) sourced from official exchange contract-spec pages -- see references/futures-contract-specs.md for the per-row source URLs and verification dates.

Worked Example: Bond Off-Grid Guard (32nds -> Decimal)

Bond/note futures (ZT, ZF, ZN, ZB) quote in fractions of a point (32nds, or 32nds-of-32nds), commonly written with an apostrophe: 110'16 means 110 + 16/32 = 110.50. Typing 110.16 instead -- reading the digits after the apostrophe as if they were decimal cents -- is a classic, silent, wrong-money-math mistake: 110.16 is not on the ZB tick grid (0.03125 = 1/32) at all.

# WRONG -- 110.16 is not on the 1/32 grid; this is almost certainly a
# mistyped "110'16" (which means 110.50). Exits 2, no report written:
python3 skills/futures-position-sizer/scripts/futures_position_sizer.py \
  --symbol ZB --direction LONG --entry 110.16 --stop 108.00 \
  --account-size 100000 --risk-pct 1.0

# CORRECT -- decimal points, not the raw 32nds digits:
python3 skills/futures-position-sizer/scripts/futures_position_sizer.py \
  --symbol ZB --direction LONG --entry 110.50 --stop 108.00 \
  --account-size 100000 --risk-pct 1.0

Every other symbol in the table quotes in plain decimal points -- an off-grid price there (a mid-quote, for instance) is only a soft off_tick_grid_* warning, never a rejection.

Output Contract

Writes futures_position_size_<SYMBOL>_<as-of>.json to --output-dir when --format json|both; --format text|both prints a formatted summary to stdout. --as-of defaults to today (this is an operator-time sizing tool, not a backtest tool).

schema_version: "1.0"
symbol: ES
direction: LONG
sizing_status: SIZED | NO_TRADE
no_trade_reason: null | risk_below_one_contract | gate_not_ready | gate_symbol_mismatch | ...
entry: 5000.25
stop: 4980.00
stop_distance_points: 20.25
stop_distance_ticks: 81
contract_spec: {multiplier: 50, tick_size: 0.25, tick_value: 12.5, currency: USD, source: cme, verified: "2026-07-17"}
risk_per_contract_usd: 1012.50
risk_budget_usd: 2000.00
contracts: 1
total_risk_usd: 1012.50
risk_pct_of_account: 1.01
max_contracts_cap_applied: false
fx_rate_used: 1.0
margin_note: "Exchange margin requirements are broker/time-dependent and NOT computed here; verify initial/maintenance margin with your broker."
gate: {report_path, setup_status, gate_confidence, warnings}   # mode B only
warnings: []
run_context: {symbol, as_of, schema_version, skill}

Guardrails

  1. Never sizes a position without an explicit stop. --stop is required in mode A; mode B refuses to size (gate_not_ready) until the gate itself reports READY_FOR_PLAN with a valid invalidation_level.
  2. Floor, never round up -- exact by construction, no epsilon. contracts = floor(risk_budget / risk_per_contract) is computed with exact rational arithmetic (Python's Fraction, not float division), so contracts * risk_per_contract <= risk_budget holds by construction -- no epsilon nudge, no float-representation edge case, and no risk of ever exceeding the budget. Also rejected outright if the resulting count is economically implausible (an absurd input like a denormal-scale multiplier override). Zero contracts is a legitimate, fail-closed NO_TRADE outcome, not an error.
  3. Two fail-closed classes, matched to who supplied the bad value. An operator-caused problem (an explicit --stop on the wrong side of --entry, a stop closer than one tick, a bond price typed off the tick grid) is a usage error: exit 2, no report written. The identical class of problem on a value that came from the untrusted gate-report file (mode B's stop) is instead a fail-closed NO_TRADE result: exit 0, a report IS written, naming the reason -- this never crashes on a bad or not-yet-ready gate file, matching every other skill in this pipeline.
  4. Bond-family off-grid prices are a hard rejection, not a warning. ZT/ZF/ZN/ZB quote in 32nds/64ths notation; a price that doesn't land on the tick grid is almost certainly a notation mistype and would silently produce wrong money math if sized. Every other symbol only warns.
  5. Margin is never computed. margin_note is a static, never-stale reminder -- margin requirements are broker- and time-dependent; this skill does not estimate them.
  6. Currency-aware. Every core-table symbol is USD-quoted (confirmed by a table-wide unit test), including the CME FX futures whose contract SIZE is denominated in a foreign currency (e.g. B6's GBP 62,500) but which trade and settle in USD. A symbol quoted in a non-USD currency (via --contract-currency override) requires an explicit --fx-rate -- there is no silent default.
  7. Not investment advice. This skill performs risk-based arithmetic on operator-supplied or gate-confirmed inputs; it does not recommend a trade, a direction, or an entry.

Resources

  • scripts/futures_position_sizer.py -- CLI: argument parsing, hardened gate-json loading (unreadable / parse_error incl. RecursionError / non_finite via an iterative whole-file scan), report generation
  • scripts/futures_sizing.py -- Pure sizing core: numeric validators, the verified 23-market contract-spec table, risk math, the floor algorithm, tick-grid guards, and gate-report shape normalization
  • references/futures-contract-specs.md -- The verified contract-spec table with per-row official source URLs and verification dates
  • references/sizing-methodology.md -- Formulas, the exact-rational floor algorithm's rationale, the fail-closed exit-code convention, and worked examples (ES long, B6 short via gate handoff)