PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

prompt-engineering-patterns

wshobson/agents

Master advanced prompt engineering patterns to optimize LLM performance and reliability.

What is prompt-engineering-patterns?

This skill teaches advanced prompt engineering techniques for production LLM applications, including few-shot learning, chain-of-thought reasoning, structured outputs, and prompt optimization. Use it when you need to design complex prompts, improve consistency, debug prompt issues, or implement specialized reasoning patterns.

  • Few-shot learning with semantic similarity and dynamic example selection
  • Chain-of-thought prompting including zero-shot, few-shot, and self-consistency techniques
  • Structured outputs using JSON mode and Pydantic schema enforcement
  • Iterative prompt optimization with A/B testing and performance measurement
  • Template systems with variable interpolation and conditional sections
  • System prompt design for behavior control and output formatting

How to install prompt-engineering-patterns

npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill prompt-engineering-patterns
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use prompt-engineering-patterns

  1. 1.Define your output schema using Pydantic BaseModel with Field descriptions
  2. 2.Create a ChatPromptTemplate with system and user message roles
  3. 3.Initialize your LLM and apply structured output constraints using with_structured_output()
  4. 4.Build a chain combining the prompt template and structured LLM
  5. 5.Test extensively on diverse inputs and track performance metrics like accuracy and token usage
  6. 6.Iterate on prompt wording, examples, and structure based on performance results

Use cases

Good for
  • Designing SQL generation prompts with structured output validation
  • Building few-shot learning systems that dynamically select relevant examples
  • Implementing chain-of-thought reasoning for complex multi-step problems
  • Optimizing prompts for production by measuring accuracy, consistency, and token usage
  • Creating reusable prompt templates with role-based composition
Who it's for
  • LLM application developers
  • Prompt engineers optimizing production systems
  • AI assistants requiring specialized behavior
  • Teams building few-shot learning systems
  • Developers implementing structured reasoning patterns

prompt-engineering-patterns FAQ

When should I use few-shot vs. zero-shot prompting?

Start with zero-shot for simplicity. Use few-shot when zero-shot produces inconsistent results or when you need to teach the model a specific format or reasoning style. Balance example count with context window constraints.

How do I handle prompts that exceed token limits?

Reduce example count, use semantic similarity to select only the most relevant examples, shorten explanations, or implement dynamic example retrieval that adapts to available context.

What's the difference between chain-of-thought and structured outputs?

Chain-of-thought elicits step-by-step reasoning in natural language; structured outputs enforce a specific schema (JSON/Pydantic) for reliable parsing. Use both together for reasoning + reliable extraction.

How do I measure if my prompt optimization is working?

Track metrics like accuracy (correctness), consistency (reproducibility), latency (response time), token usage, success rate (valid outputs), and user satisfaction. Compare baseline vs. optimized versions.

Should I version control my prompts?

Yes. Treat prompts as code with version control, documentation of intent, and change tracking. This enables rollback, comparison, and understanding why specific wording was chosen.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from wshobson/agents.


name: prompt-engineering-patterns description: >- This skill should be used when the user asks to "optimize a prompt", "improve prompt performance", "design a prompt template", "write better prompts", "debug prompt issues", "use chain-of-thought", "structured prompting", "few-shot prompting", or wants to apply advanced prompt engineering patterns for production LLM applications.

Prompt Engineering Patterns

Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.

When to Use This Skill

  • Designing complex prompts for production LLM applications
  • Optimizing prompt performance and consistency
  • Implementing structured reasoning patterns (chain-of-thought, tree-of-thought)
  • Building few-shot learning systems with dynamic example selection
  • Creating reusable prompt templates with variable interpolation
  • Debugging and refining prompts that produce inconsistent outputs
  • Implementing system prompts for specialized AI assistants
  • Using structured outputs (JSON mode) for reliable parsing

Core Capabilities

1. Few-Shot Learning

  • Example selection strategies (semantic similarity, diversity sampling)
  • Balancing example count with context window constraints
  • Constructing effective demonstrations with input-output pairs
  • Dynamic example retrieval from knowledge bases
  • Handling edge cases through strategic example selection

2. Chain-of-Thought Prompting

  • Step-by-step reasoning elicitation
  • Zero-shot CoT with "Let's think step by step"
  • Few-shot CoT with reasoning traces
  • Self-consistency techniques (sampling multiple reasoning paths)
  • Verification and validation steps

3. Structured Outputs

  • JSON mode for reliable parsing
  • Pydantic schema enforcement
  • Type-safe response handling
  • Error handling for malformed outputs

4. Prompt Optimization

  • Iterative refinement workflows
  • A/B testing prompt variations
  • Measuring prompt performance metrics (accuracy, consistency, latency)
  • Reducing token usage while maintaining quality
  • Handling edge cases and failure modes

5. Template Systems

  • Variable interpolation and formatting
  • Conditional prompt sections
  • Multi-turn conversation templates
  • Role-based prompt composition
  • Modular prompt components

6. System Prompt Design

  • Setting model behavior and constraints
  • Defining output formats and structure
  • Establishing role and expertise
  • Safety guidelines and content policies
  • Context setting and background information

Quick Start

from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

# Define structured output schema
class SQLQuery(BaseModel):
    query: str = Field(description="The SQL query")
    explanation: str = Field(description="Brief explanation of what the query does")
    tables_used: list[str] = Field(description="List of tables referenced")

# Initialize model with structured output
llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-4-6")
structured_llm = llm.with_structured_output(SQLQuery)

# Create prompt template
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages([
    ("system", """You are an expert SQL developer. Generate efficient, secure SQL queries.
    Always use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.
    Explain your reasoning briefly."""),
    ("user", "Convert this to SQL: {query}")
])

# Create chain
chain = prompt | structured_llm

# Use
result = await chain.ainvoke({
    "query": "Find all users who registered in the last 30 days"
})
print(result.query)
print(result.explanation)

Detailed patterns and worked examples

Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.

Best Practices

  1. Be Specific: Vague prompts produce inconsistent results
  2. Show, Don't Tell: Examples are more effective than descriptions
  3. Use Structured Outputs: Enforce schemas with Pydantic for reliability
  4. Test Extensively: Evaluate on diverse, representative inputs
  5. Iterate Rapidly: Small changes can have large impacts
  6. Monitor Performance: Track metrics in production
  7. Version Control: Treat prompts as code with proper versioning
  8. Document Intent: Explain why prompts are structured as they are

Common Pitfalls

  • Over-engineering: Starting with complex prompts before trying simple ones
  • Example pollution: Using examples that don't match the target task
  • Context overflow: Exceeding token limits with excessive examples
  • Ambiguous instructions: Leaving room for multiple interpretations
  • Ignoring edge cases: Not testing on unusual or boundary inputs
  • No error handling: Assuming outputs will always be well-formed
  • Hardcoded values: Not parameterizing prompts for reuse

Success Metrics

Track these KPIs for your prompts:

  • Accuracy: Correctness of outputs
  • Consistency: Reproducibility across similar inputs
  • Latency: Response time (P50, P95, P99)
  • Token Usage: Average tokens per request
  • Success Rate: Percentage of valid, parseable outputs
  • User Satisfaction: Ratings and feedback