rsa-attack-techniques
yaklang/hack-skills
Exploit weak RSA keys and parameters via factorization, small exponents, lattice attacks, and oracle techniques.
What is rsa-attack-techniques?
RSA attack playbook for CTF and authorized cryptanalysis. Use when given RSA parameters (n, e, c) to recover plaintext by identifying and exploiting weak keys, small exponents, shared factors, padding oracles, or other structural vulnerabilities.
- Direct factorization for small moduli and Fermat/Pollard's p-1 for smooth factors
- Small exponent attacks: cube root (e=3), Hastad broadcast, Franklin-Reiter related messages
- Wiener and Boneh-Durfee attacks for small private exponent d via continued fractions and lattice reduction
- Coppersmith's method for stereotyped messages and partial key exposure
- Common modulus and batch GCD attacks when multiple RSA instances share factors
- LSB/parity oracle and Bleichenbacher padding oracle attacks
How to install rsa-attack-techniques
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill rsa-attack-techniques- Python with gmpy2, sympy, or SageMath for mathematical operations
- RsaCtfTool or factordb access for automated factorization
- SageMath for lattice-based attacks (Boneh-Durfee, Coppersmith)
How to use rsa-attack-techniques
- 1.Identify which RSA parameters are known (n, e, c, p, q, d) and what is weak or exposed
- 2.Select the appropriate attack from the quick selection table based on observable properties
- 3.Implement or use provided code snippets (factorization, small exponent, Wiener, Coppersmith, oracle)
- 4.Run the attack to recover plaintext or private key components
- 5.Verify the result by decryption or signature verification
Use cases
- CTF challenges with weak RSA parameters or known structural weaknesses
- Real-world assessments where RSA keys are suspected to have small factors or smooth p-1
- Recovering plaintext when multiple ciphertexts of the same message exist under different keys
- Exploiting side-channel or padding oracles in RSA implementations
- Analyzing partial key leakage (MSB/LSB of p) to recover full private key
- CTF competitors and security researchers
- Authorized penetration testers assessing RSA implementations
- Cryptanalysts performing key recovery on weak or misconfigured RSA systems
rsa-attack-techniques FAQ
Use Wiener when d < n^(1/4)/3 via continued fractions (simpler, no lattice reduction needed). Use Boneh-Durfee when d < n^0.292 and Wiener fails; it requires SageMath lattice reduction (LLL/BKZ).
Try factordb first (online database). If n < 512 bits, direct factorization is fast. For larger n, check if p-1 or p+1 is B-smooth using Pollard's p-1 or p+1. If none work, the key is likely secure.
Use Bleichenbacher attack (PKCS#1 v1.5) or LSB oracle attack depending on the oracle type. Both iteratively narrow the plaintext range using oracle responses.
Yes, use Coppersmith's method if you know MSB or LSB of p. The method recovers the full prime p from partial exposure.
When the same message is encrypted twice under the same n but with different coprime exponents e1 and e2, you can recover the plaintext using extended GCD without factoring n.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from yaklang/hack-skills.
name: rsa-attack-techniques description: >- RSA attack playbook for CTF and real-world cryptanalysis. Use when given RSA parameters (n, e, c) and need to recover plaintext by exploiting weak keys, small exponents, shared factors, or padding oracles.
SKILL: RSA Attack Techniques — Expert Cryptanalysis Playbook
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert RSA attack techniques for CTF and authorized security assessments. Covers factorization attacks, small exponent exploits, lattice-based approaches (Wiener/Boneh-Durfee/Coppersmith), broadcast attacks, common modulus, padding oracles, and fault attacks. Base models often suggest attacks that don't match the given parameters or miss the correct attack selection based on what's known.
0. RELATED ROUTING
- lattice-crypto-attacks for deep lattice theory behind Coppersmith/Boneh-Durfee
- hash-attack-techniques when RSA signature forgery involves hash weaknesses
- symmetric-cipher-attacks when RSA protects a symmetric key (hybrid encryption)
Advanced Reference
Also load RSA_ATTACK_CATALOG.md when you need:
- Detailed SageMath/Python implementation for each attack
- Step-by-step mathematical derivation
- Edge cases and failure conditions per attack
Quick attack selection
| Given / Observable | Attack | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Small n (< 512 bits) | Direct factorization | factordb, yafu, msieve |
| e = 3, small message | Cube root | gmpy2.iroot |
| Multiple (n, c) same small e | Hastad broadcast | CRT + iroot |
| Very large e or very small d | Wiener / Boneh-Durfee | SageMath, RsaCtfTool |
| Partial p knowledge | Coppersmith small roots | SageMath |
| Same n, different e | Common modulus | Extended GCD |
| Multiple n values | Batch GCD (shared factor) | Python/SageMath |
| Padding error oracle | Bleichenbacher | Custom script |
| LSB parity oracle | LSB oracle attack | Custom script |
| Fault in CRT computation | RSA-CRT fault | Single faulty signature |
1. FACTORIZATION ATTACKS
1.1 Direct Factorization (Small n)
from sympy import factorint
n = 0x... # small modulus
factors = factorint(n)
p, q = list(factors.keys())
When: n < ~512 bits, or known to be in factordb.
1.2 Fermat's Factorization
Works when p and q are close together: |p - q| is small.
from gmpy2 import isqrt, is_square
def fermat_factor(n):
a = isqrt(n) + 1
while True:
b2 = a * a - n
if is_square(b2):
b = isqrt(b2)
return (a + b, a - b)
a += 1
1.3 Pollard's p-1
Works when p-1 has only small prime factors (B-smooth).
from gmpy2 import gcd
def pollard_p1(n, B=2**20):
a = 2
for j in range(2, B):
a = pow(a, j, n)
d = gcd(a - 1, n)
if 1 < d < n:
return d
return None
1.4 Batch GCD (Multiple n share a factor)
from math import gcd
from functools import reduce
def batch_gcd(moduli):
"""Find shared factors among multiple RSA moduli."""
product = reduce(lambda a, b: a * b, moduli)
results = {}
for i, n in enumerate(moduli):
remainder = product // n
g = gcd(n, remainder)
if g != 1 and g != n:
results[i] = (g, n // g)
return results
2. SMALL EXPONENT ATTACKS
2.1 Cube Root Attack (e = 3, small m)
If m^e < n (no modular reduction occurred), simply take the e-th root.
from gmpy2 import iroot
c = 0x... # ciphertext
e = 3
m, exact = iroot(c, e)
if exact:
print(f"Plaintext: {bytes.fromhex(hex(m)[2:])}")
2.2 Hastad Broadcast Attack
Same message encrypted with same small e under different moduli (n₁, n₂, ..., nₑ).
from sympy.ntheory.modular import crt
from gmpy2 import iroot
# e = 3, three ciphertexts under three different n
n_list = [n1, n2, n3]
c_list = [c1, c2, c3]
# CRT: find x such that x ≡ ci (mod ni) for all i
r, M = crt(n_list, c_list)
m, exact = iroot(r, 3)
assert exact
2.3 Related Message Attack (Franklin-Reiter)
Two messages related by a known linear function: m₂ = a·m₁ + b. Same n and e.
# SageMath
def franklin_reiter(n, e, c1, c2, a, b):
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Zmod(n))
f1 = x^e - c1
f2 = (a*x + b)^e - c2
return Integer(n - gcd(f1, f2).coefficients()[0])
3. LARGE e / SMALL d ATTACKS
3.1 Wiener's Attack (Continued Fractions)
When d < n^(1/4) / 3, the continued fraction expansion of e/n reveals d.
def wiener_attack(e, n):
"""Recover d when d is small via continued fractions."""
cf = continued_fraction(e, n)
convergents = get_convergents(cf)
for k, d in convergents:
if k == 0:
continue
phi_candidate = (e * d - 1) // k
# phi(n) = n - p - q + 1 → p + q = n - phi + 1
s = n - phi_candidate + 1
# p, q are roots of x^2 - s*x + n = 0
discriminant = s * s - 4 * n
if discriminant >= 0:
from gmpy2 import isqrt, is_square
if is_square(discriminant):
return d
return None
def continued_fraction(a, b):
cf = []
while b:
cf.append(a // b)
a, b = b, a % b
return cf
def get_convergents(cf):
convergents = []
h_prev, h_curr = 0, 1
k_prev, k_curr = 1, 0
for a in cf:
h_prev, h_curr = h_curr, a * h_curr + h_prev
k_prev, k_curr = k_curr, a * k_curr + k_prev
convergents.append((h_curr, k_curr))
return convergents
3.2 Boneh-Durfee Attack (Lattice-Based)
Extends Wiener: works when d < n^0.292. Uses lattice reduction (LLL/BKZ).
Use SageMath implementation — see lattice-crypto-attacks for theory.
4. COPPERSMITH'S METHOD
4.1 Stereotyped Message
Known portion of plaintext, unknown part is small.
# SageMath
n = ...
e = 3
c = ...
known_prefix = b"flag{" + b"\x00" * 27 # known prefix, unknown suffix
known_int = int.from_bytes(known_prefix, 'big')
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Zmod(n))
f = (known_int + x)^e - c
roots = f.small_roots(X=2^(27*8), beta=1.0)
if roots:
m = known_int + int(roots[0])
print(bytes.fromhex(hex(m)[2:]))
4.2 Partial Key Exposure
Known MSB or LSB of p → recover full p via Coppersmith.
# SageMath — known MSB of p
p_msb = ... # known upper bits of p
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Zmod(n))
f = p_msb + x
roots = f.small_roots(X=2^unknown_bits, beta=0.5)
if roots:
p = p_msb + int(roots[0])
q = n // p
5. COMMON MODULUS ATTACK
Two ciphertexts of same message under same n but different e₁, e₂ where gcd(e₁, e₂) = 1.
from gmpy2 import gcd, invert
def common_modulus(n, e1, e2, c1, c2):
"""Recover m when same message encrypted with two different e under same n."""
assert gcd(e1, e2) == 1
_, s1, s2 = extended_gcd(e1, e2) # s1*e1 + s2*e2 = 1
if s1 < 0:
c1 = invert(c1, n)
s1 = -s1
if s2 < 0:
c2 = invert(c2, n)
s2 = -s2
m = (pow(c1, s1, n) * pow(c2, s2, n)) % n
return m
def extended_gcd(a, b):
if a == 0:
return b, 0, 1
g, x, y = extended_gcd(b % a, a)
return g, y - (b // a) * x, x
6. ORACLE ATTACKS
6.1 LSB Oracle (Parity Oracle)
An oracle reveals whether decrypted message is even or odd.
from gmpy2 import mpz
def lsb_oracle_attack(n, e, c, oracle_func):
"""Decrypt using LSB (parity) oracle. oracle_func(c) returns m%2."""
from fractions import Fraction
lo, hi = Fraction(0), Fraction(n)
for _ in range(n.bit_length()):
c = (c * pow(2, e, n)) % n # multiply plaintext by 2
if oracle_func(c) == 0:
hi = (lo + hi) / 2
else:
lo = (lo + hi) / 2
return int(hi)
6.2 Bleichenbacher (PKCS#1 v1.5 Padding Oracle)
Given a padding validity oracle (valid/invalid PKCS#1 v1.5), iteratively narrow down the plaintext range.
Complexity: O(2^16) oracle queries per byte on average.
Target: TLS implementations returning different errors for valid/invalid padding.
6.3 Manger's Attack (PKCS#1 OAEP)
Similar to Bleichenbacher but for OAEP padding. Exploits oracle that distinguishes whether the first byte after unpadding is 0x00.
7. RSA-CRT FAULT ATTACK
If RSA-CRT signing produces a faulty signature (fault in one CRT half):
def rsa_crt_fault(n, e, correct_sig, faulty_sig, msg):
"""Factor n from one correct and one faulty CRT signature."""
from math import gcd
diff = pow(correct_sig, e, n) - pow(faulty_sig, e, n)
p = gcd(diff % n, n)
if 1 < p < n:
q = n // p
return p, q
return None
# Even simpler: only faulty signature needed if message is known
def rsa_crt_fault_simple(n, e, faulty_sig, msg):
p = gcd(pow(faulty_sig, e, n) - msg, n)
if 1 < p < n:
return p, n // p
return None
8. DECISION TREE
RSA challenge — what information do you have?
│
├─ Have n and it's small (< 512 bits)?
│ └─ Factor directly: factordb.com → yafu → msieve
│
├─ Have multiple n values?
│ └─ Batch GCD — shared factors?
│ ├─ Yes → factor all that share factors
│ └─ No → analyze each n individually
│
├─ Know e?
│ ├─ e = 3 (or small)?
│ │ ├─ Single ciphertext, small message → cube root
│ │ ├─ Multiple ciphertexts, different n → Hastad broadcast
│ │ ├─ Two related messages → Franklin-Reiter
│ │ └─ Partial plaintext known → Coppersmith
│ │
│ ├─ e is very large?
│ │ └─ d is likely small → Wiener → Boneh-Durfee
│ │
│ └─ Same n, two different e values?
│ └─ Common modulus attack (Bezout coefficients)
│
├─ Know partial factorization info?
│ ├─ Know some bits of p → Coppersmith partial key
│ ├─ p-1 is B-smooth → Pollard p-1
│ └─ p ≈ q (close primes) → Fermat factorization
│
├─ Have an oracle?
│ ├─ Parity oracle (LSB) → LSB oracle attack
│ ├─ Padding validity oracle (PKCS#1 v1.5) → Bleichenbacher
│ └─ OAEP oracle → Manger's attack
│
├─ Have faulty signature?
│ └─ RSA-CRT fault → factor n from faulty sig
│
├─ Know e·d relationship?
│ └─ e·d ≡ 1 mod φ(n) → factor n from (e,d,n)
│
└─ None of the above?
├─ Check factordb for known factorization
├─ Try Pollard rho for medium-size n
├─ Look for implementation flaws (weak PRNG for key generation)
└─ Consider side-channel if physical access available
9. TOOLS
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| RsaCtfTool | Automated RSA attack suite | python3 RsaCtfTool.py --publickey pub.pem --uncipherfile flag.enc |
| SageMath | Mathematical computation | Coppersmith, lattice attacks, polynomial arithmetic |
| factordb.com | Online factor database | Check if n is already factored |
| yafu | Fast factorization (SIQS/GNFS) | yafu "factor(n)" |
| msieve | GNFS factorization | Large n factorization |
| gmpy2 | Fast Python integer library | iroot, invert, gcd |
| pycryptodome | RSA primitives | Key construction from factors |
RsaCtfTool Quick Commands
# From public key
python3 RsaCtfTool.py --publickey pub.pem -n --private
# From parameters
python3 RsaCtfTool.py -n $N -e $E --uncipher $C
# Try all attacks
python3 RsaCtfTool.py --publickey pub.pem --uncipherfile flag.enc --attack all
Decrypt After Factoring
from Crypto.PublicKey import RSA
from gmpy2 import invert
p, q = ... # factored
n = p * q
e = 65537
phi = (p - 1) * (q - 1)
d = int(invert(e, phi))
c = ... # ciphertext as integer
m = pow(c, d, n)
plaintext = m.to_bytes((m.bit_length() + 7) // 8, 'big')
print(plaintext)
Related skills
More from yaklang/hack-skills and the wider catalog.

saml-sso-assertion-attacks
Test SAML SSO assertion signature validation, binding, and trust boundary flaws in enterprise authentication.

sandbox-escape-techniques
Expert sandbox escape techniques across Python, Lua, seccomp, chroot, Docker, browser, and namespace contexts.

smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Expert audit playbook for Solidity/EVM smart contract vulnerabilities: reentrancy, overflow, access control, delegatecall, MEV, and signature replay.

sqli-sql-injection
Advanced SQL injection exploitation playbook for database attack scenarios.

ssrf-server-side-request-forgery
Expert SSRF attack playbook: URL filter bypass, cloud metadata, protocol exploitation, and blind detection.

ssti-server-side-template-injection
Expert SSTI detection, fingerprinting, and RCE exploitation across Jinja2, FreeMarker, Twig, Velocity, ERB, and more.