agent-orchestration
yonatangross/orchestkit
Patterns for autonomous agent loops, multi-agent coordination, and framework selection.
What is agent-orchestration?
Agent orchestration patterns for building and coordinating AI agents—from single-agent reasoning loops to multi-agent systems and framework evaluation. Use when constructing ReAct loops, coordinating multiple agents via supervisor routing, comparing CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating parallel multi-scenario workflows.
- Build autonomous agent reasoning loops (ReAct, plan-and-execute, self-correction) with step limits and memory management
- Coordinate 3–8 specialist agents via fan-out/fan-in parallelism, supervisor routing, and result synthesis
- Evaluate and implement alternative frameworks (CrewAI, OpenAI Agents SDK, AutoGen, LangGraph) matched to team expertise
- Orchestrate parallel simple/medium/complex scenarios with progressive difficulty scaling (1x/3x/8x) and milestone synchronization
- Route agent work via Agent tool (star topology), Agent Teams (mesh topology), or CC Workflows (background fan-out)
How to install agent-orchestration
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill agent-orchestration- Claude Code 2.1.277 or later
- Familiarity with async/await patterns (Python asyncio)
- Basic understanding of LLM prompting and tool use
How to use agent-orchestration
- 1.Review the Quick Reference table to identify which category matches your use case (loops, coordination, frameworks, or scenarios)
- 2.Consult the appropriate upstream source (OpenAI function-calling guide, LangGraph docs, CrewAI docs, or Anthropic agent research) for implementation details
- 3.Apply house defaults from `references/ork-delta.md` for key decisions (max steps, agent count, temperature, memory window)
- 4.Load the relevant rule file from `rules/` on-demand (coordination and scenario rules are loaded conditionally)
- 5.Test with 3–8 agents in parallel; use Agent tool for simple star topology, Agent Teams for mesh topology, or CC Workflows for large background fan-out
Use cases
- Building a ReAct loop with tool use and self-correction for complex question-answering
- Coordinating security, performance, and compliance agents to analyze code in parallel and synthesize findings
- Comparing CrewAI hierarchical crews vs. OpenAI Agents SDK handoffs to pick the right framework for your team
- Running a skill across three difficulty tiers simultaneously (simple baseline, medium standard, complex edge-case) with shared checkpoints
- Implementing supervisor-routed multi-agent workflows where agents hand off tasks based on dependencies
- AI engineers building autonomous agent systems
- Teams evaluating multi-agent frameworks (CrewAI, AutoGen, Swarm, LangGraph)
- Developers orchestrating complex workflows with 3–8 specialist agents
- Architects designing scalable agent coordination patterns
- Researchers prototyping ReAct and plan-and-execute reasoning loops
agent-orchestration FAQ
Use CC `/workflows` for large-scale, fire-and-forget background fan-out (you check back later). Use these bounded foreground patterns when ≤8 agents must coordinate within a single skill invocation via shared memory (handoff files, mesh messaging).
5–15 steps, depending on task complexity. This prevents infinite loops while allowing enough iterations for multi-step reasoning and self-correction.
3–8 specialist agents per workflow. Fewer agents reduce coordination overhead; more than 8 typically requires a Workflow or external orchestrator.
Match to team expertise and use case: LangGraph for state machines, CrewAI for role-based teams, OpenAI SDK for handoff workflows, Microsoft Agent Framework for enterprise compliance. See `references/framework-comparison.md` for a decision matrix.
Use the multi-scenario pattern: always 3 scenarios (simple/medium/complex), 1x/3x/8x exponential scaling, 30s/90s/300s time budgets, and milestone synchronization for cross-scenario result aggregation.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from yonatangross/orchestkit.
name: agent-orchestration license: MIT compatibility: "Claude Code 2.1.277+." description: Agent orchestration patterns for agentic loops, multi-agent coordination, alternative frameworks, and multi-scenario workflows. Use when building autonomous agent loops, coordinating multiple agents, evaluating CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating complex multi-step scenarios. context: fork agent: workflow-architect user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true effort: high metadata: category: workflow-automation version: "2.0.0" author: "OrchestKit" complexity: "high" tags: "agents, orchestration, multi-agent, agent-loops, crewai, autogen, swarm, coordination" allowed-tools:
- Read
- Glob
- Grep
- WebFetch
- WebSearch
Agent Orchestration
Comprehensive patterns for building and coordinating AI agents -- from single-agent reasoning loops to multi-agent systems and framework selection. Coordination and multi-scenario categories have individual rule files in rules/ loaded on-demand; loop and framework tutorials live upstream (see Upstream coverage), with house defaults in references/ork-delta.md.
CC native
/workflows(2.1.154): Claude Code now ships dynamic workflows — ask Claude to create a workflow and it orchestrates tens-to-hundreds of agents in the background; view runs with/workflows. This is complementary to the patterns here: use CC/workflowsfor large-scale, fire-and-forget background fan-out (you check back later); use the bounded foreground Agent Teams / Task-tool patterns below when ≤8 agents must coordinate within a single skill invocation via shared memory (handoff files, mesh messaging). Different scale, not a replacement.Ask only when genuinely blocked (CC 2.1.154): CC now reserves the multiple-choice question prompt for decisions it genuinely cannot make itself, rather than asking when it already has enough context to proceed. When orchestrating agents, don't gate progress on an
AskUserQuestionthe lead can resolve from available context — reserve prompts for true branch points (irreversible actions, missing requirements). This complements ork's voice-friendly decision guidance.
Quick Reference
| Category | Rules | Impact | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent Loops | upstream | HIGH | ReAct reasoning, plan-and-execute, self-correction |
| Multi-Agent Coordination | 2 | CRITICAL | Supervisor routing, agent debate, result synthesis |
| Alternative Frameworks | upstream | HIGH | CrewAI crews, AutoGen teams, framework comparison |
| Multi-Scenario | 2 | MEDIUM | Parallel scenario orchestration, difficulty routing |
Total: 4 rules across 4 categories. Loop and framework tutorials moved to first-party sources; the rescued house defaults live in references/ork-delta.md.
Quick Start
# ReAct agent loop
async def react_loop(question: str, tools: dict, max_steps: int = 10) -> str:
history = REACT_PROMPT.format(tools=list(tools.keys()), question=question)
for step in range(max_steps):
response = await llm.chat([{"role": "user", "content": history}])
if "Final Answer:" in response.content:
return response.content.split("Final Answer:")[-1].strip()
if "Action:" in response.content:
action = parse_action(response.content)
result = await tools[action.name](*action.args)
history += f"\nObservation: {result}\n"
return "Max steps reached without answer"
# Supervisor with fan-out/fan-in
async def multi_agent_analysis(content: str) -> dict:
agents = [("security", security_agent), ("perf", perf_agent)]
tasks = [agent(content) for _, agent in agents]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)
return await synthesize_findings(results)
Agent Loops
Patterns for autonomous LLM reasoning: ReAct (Reasoning + Acting), Plan-and-Execute with replanning, self-correction loops, and sliding-window memory management.
Key decisions: Max steps 5-15, temperature 0.3-0.7, memory window 10-20 messages.
Multi-Agent Coordination
Fan-out/fan-in parallelism, supervisor routing with dependency ordering, conflict resolution (confidence-based or LLM arbitration), result synthesis, and CC Agent Teams (mesh topology for peer messaging in CC 2.1.33+).
Key decisions: 3-8 specialists, parallelize independent agents. Pick one of three modes: the Agent tool (star) for simple work, Agent Teams (mesh) for cross-cutting concerns, and a Workflow for large background fan-out you check back on later.
Alternative Frameworks
CrewAI hierarchical crews with Flows (1.8+), OpenAI Agents SDK handoffs and guardrails (0.12+), Microsoft Agent Framework (AutoGen + SK merger), GPT-5.2-Codex for long-horizon coding, and AG2 for open-source flexibility.
Key decisions: Match framework to team expertise + use case. LangGraph for state machines, CrewAI for role-based teams, OpenAI SDK for handoff workflows, MS Agent for enterprise compliance.
Multi-Scenario
Orchestrate a single skill across 3 parallel scenarios (simple/medium/complex) with progressive difficulty scaling (1x/3x/8x), milestone synchronization, and cross-scenario result aggregation.
Key decisions: Free-running with checkpoints, always 3 scenarios, 1x/3x/8x exponential scaling, 30s/90s/300s time budgets.
Upstream coverage (do not restate)
Local tutorials for these topics were retired; consult the first-party source and keep only house deltas in references/ork-delta.md.
| Topic | First-party source |
|---|---|
| ReAct / plan-and-execute / self-correction loop implementations | OpenAI function calling guide (https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/function-calling); LangGraph tutorials (context7: /langchain-ai/langgraph) |
| Fan-out coordination, result-synthesis boilerplate, and the generic multi-agent design checklist | Python asyncio docs (https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html); Anthropic "Building effective agents" (https://www.anthropic.com/research/building-effective-agents); ork:langgraph supervisor patterns |
| CrewAI (crews, Flows, MCP tools, guardrails) | CrewAI docs (https://docs.crewai.com); context7: /crewaiinc/crewai |
| OpenAI Agents SDK (handoffs, sessions, guardrails, MCP) | https://openai.github.io/openai-agents-python/ ; context7: /openai/openai-agents-python |
| Microsoft Agent Framework / AutoGen (teams, termination, A2A) | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/ ; context7: /microsoft/autogen |
| GPT-5.2-Codex capabilities, pricing, IDE integrations | OpenAI model docs (https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) |
| Multi-scenario state machine, architecture and skill-agnostic template deep-dives | Superseded in-skill by rules/scenario-orchestrator.md and rules/scenario-routing.md |
References
references/ork-delta.md- House defaults and dated decisions rescued from retired tutorialsreferences/framework-comparison.md- Condensed framework decision matrix and use-case tablereferences/langgraph-implementation.md- LangGraph 1.2+ implementation of the multi-scenario orchestratorreferences/claude-code-instance-management.md- Running 3 parallel Claude Code instances for scenario demos
Key Decisions
| Decision | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Single vs multi-agent | Single for focused tasks, multi for decomposable work |
| Max loop steps | 5-15 (prevent infinite loops) |
| Agent count | 3-8 specialists per workflow |
| Framework | Match to team expertise + use case |
| Topology | Agent tool (star) for simple; Agent Teams (mesh) for complex; Workflow for large background fan-out |
| Scenario count | Always 3: simple, medium, complex |
Common Mistakes
- No step limit in agent loops (infinite loops)
- No memory management (context overflow)
- No error isolation in multi-agent (one failure crashes all)
- Note (CC 2.1.161): parallel tool calls now fail independently — a failed Bash no longer cancels siblings in the same batch. This caveat still applies at the agent-orchestration level, not to tool batches;
claude agentsrows now showdone/totalfor fanned-out work. - Note (CC 2.1.157):
claude agentshonors theagentfield insettings.jsonfor dispatched sessions;--agent <name>overrides it — pin the agent type explicitly when dispatching.
- Note (CC 2.1.161): parallel tool calls now fail independently — a failed Bash no longer cancels siblings in the same batch. This caveat still applies at the agent-orchestration level, not to tool batches;
- Missing synthesis step (raw agent outputs not useful)
- Mixing frameworks in one project (complexity explosion)
- Using Agent Teams for simple sequential work (use the Agent tool)
- Sequential instead of parallel scenarios (defeats purpose)
Related Skills
ork:langgraph- LangGraph workflow patterns (supervisor, routing, state)function-calling- Tool definitions and executionork:task-dependency-patterns- Task management with Agent Teams workflow
Capability Details
react-loop
Keywords: react, reason, act, observe, loop, agent Solves:
- Implement ReAct pattern
- Create reasoning loops
- Build iterative agents
plan-execute
Keywords: plan, execute, replan, multi-step, autonomous Solves:
- Create plan then execute steps
- Implement replanning on failure
- Build goal-oriented agents
supervisor-coordination
Keywords: supervisor, route, coordinate, fan-out, fan-in, parallel Solves:
- Route tasks to specialized agents
- Run agents in parallel
- Aggregate multi-agent results
agent-debate
Keywords: debate, conflict, resolution, arbitration, consensus Solves:
- Resolve agent disagreements
- Implement LLM arbitration
- Handle conflicting outputs
result-synthesis
Keywords: synthesize, combine, aggregate, merge, summary Solves:
- Combine outputs from multiple agents
- Create executive summaries
- Score confidence across findings
crewai-patterns
Keywords: crewai, crew, hierarchical, delegation, role-based, flows Solves:
- Build role-based agent teams
- Implement hierarchical coordination
- Use Flows for event-driven orchestration
autogen-patterns
Keywords: autogen, microsoft, agent framework, teams, enterprise, a2a Solves:
- Build enterprise agent systems
- Use AutoGen/SK merged framework
- Implement A2A protocol
framework-selection
Keywords: choose, compare, framework, decision, which, crewai, autogen, openai Solves:
- Select appropriate framework
- Compare framework capabilities
- Match framework to requirements
scenario-orchestrator
Keywords: scenario, parallel, fan-out, difficulty, progressive, demo Solves:
- Run skill across multiple difficulty levels
- Implement parallel scenario execution
- Aggregate cross-scenario results
scenario-routing
Keywords: route, synchronize, milestone, checkpoint, scaling Solves:
- Route tasks by difficulty level
- Synchronize at milestones
- Scale inputs progressively
Related skills
More from yonatangross/orchestkit and the wider catalog.

architecture-decision-record
Nygard-format ADR templates for documenting architectural decisions with context, consequences, and alternatives.

devops-deployment
CI/CD pipelines, containerization, Kubernetes, and infrastructure-as-code patterns for DevOps workflows.

domain-driven-design
DDD tactical patterns for rich domain modeling with entities, value objects, and aggregates.

memory
Unified read-side memory operations including knowledge graph search, session context loading, decision timeline viewing, and Mermaid graph visualization. Subcommands: search, load, history, viz, status. Complements /ork:remember (write-side). Use when searching past decisions, loading context, or visualizing the knowledge graph.

rag-retrieval
Production RAG patterns: embeddings, hybrid search, reranking, HyDE, agentic retrieval, and pgvector indexing.

responsive-patterns
Container queries, fluid typography, and mobile-first patterns for responsive React layouts.