PluginBench
Skill
Review
Audit score 70

agent-orchestration

yonatangross/orchestkit

Patterns for autonomous agent loops, multi-agent coordination, and framework selection.

What is agent-orchestration?

Agent orchestration patterns for building and coordinating AI agents—from single-agent reasoning loops to multi-agent systems and framework evaluation. Use when constructing ReAct loops, coordinating multiple agents via supervisor routing, comparing CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating parallel multi-scenario workflows.

  • Build autonomous agent reasoning loops (ReAct, plan-and-execute, self-correction) with step limits and memory management
  • Coordinate 3–8 specialist agents via fan-out/fan-in parallelism, supervisor routing, and result synthesis
  • Evaluate and implement alternative frameworks (CrewAI, OpenAI Agents SDK, AutoGen, LangGraph) matched to team expertise
  • Orchestrate parallel simple/medium/complex scenarios with progressive difficulty scaling (1x/3x/8x) and milestone synchronization
  • Route agent work via Agent tool (star topology), Agent Teams (mesh topology), or CC Workflows (background fan-out)

How to install agent-orchestration

npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill agent-orchestration
Prerequisites
  • Claude Code 2.1.277 or later
  • Familiarity with async/await patterns (Python asyncio)
  • Basic understanding of LLM prompting and tool use
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use agent-orchestration

  1. 1.Review the Quick Reference table to identify which category matches your use case (loops, coordination, frameworks, or scenarios)
  2. 2.Consult the appropriate upstream source (OpenAI function-calling guide, LangGraph docs, CrewAI docs, or Anthropic agent research) for implementation details
  3. 3.Apply house defaults from `references/ork-delta.md` for key decisions (max steps, agent count, temperature, memory window)
  4. 4.Load the relevant rule file from `rules/` on-demand (coordination and scenario rules are loaded conditionally)
  5. 5.Test with 3–8 agents in parallel; use Agent tool for simple star topology, Agent Teams for mesh topology, or CC Workflows for large background fan-out

Use cases

Good for
  • Building a ReAct loop with tool use and self-correction for complex question-answering
  • Coordinating security, performance, and compliance agents to analyze code in parallel and synthesize findings
  • Comparing CrewAI hierarchical crews vs. OpenAI Agents SDK handoffs to pick the right framework for your team
  • Running a skill across three difficulty tiers simultaneously (simple baseline, medium standard, complex edge-case) with shared checkpoints
  • Implementing supervisor-routed multi-agent workflows where agents hand off tasks based on dependencies
Who it's for
  • AI engineers building autonomous agent systems
  • Teams evaluating multi-agent frameworks (CrewAI, AutoGen, Swarm, LangGraph)
  • Developers orchestrating complex workflows with 3–8 specialist agents
  • Architects designing scalable agent coordination patterns
  • Researchers prototyping ReAct and plan-and-execute reasoning loops

agent-orchestration FAQ

Should I use CC native `/workflows` or these orchestration patterns?

Use CC `/workflows` for large-scale, fire-and-forget background fan-out (you check back later). Use these bounded foreground patterns when ≤8 agents must coordinate within a single skill invocation via shared memory (handoff files, mesh messaging).

What's the recommended max step limit for agent loops?

5–15 steps, depending on task complexity. This prevents infinite loops while allowing enough iterations for multi-step reasoning and self-correction.

How many agents should I coordinate in a multi-agent workflow?

3–8 specialist agents per workflow. Fewer agents reduce coordination overhead; more than 8 typically requires a Workflow or external orchestrator.

Which framework should I pick: CrewAI, AutoGen, or OpenAI Agents SDK?

Match to team expertise and use case: LangGraph for state machines, CrewAI for role-based teams, OpenAI SDK for handoff workflows, Microsoft Agent Framework for enterprise compliance. See `references/framework-comparison.md` for a decision matrix.

How do I orchestrate parallel scenarios with different difficulty levels?

Use the multi-scenario pattern: always 3 scenarios (simple/medium/complex), 1x/3x/8x exponential scaling, 30s/90s/300s time budgets, and milestone synchronization for cross-scenario result aggregation.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from yonatangross/orchestkit.


name: agent-orchestration license: MIT compatibility: "Claude Code 2.1.277+." description: Agent orchestration patterns for agentic loops, multi-agent coordination, alternative frameworks, and multi-scenario workflows. Use when building autonomous agent loops, coordinating multiple agents, evaluating CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating complex multi-step scenarios. context: fork agent: workflow-architect user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true effort: high metadata: category: workflow-automation version: "2.0.0" author: "OrchestKit" complexity: "high" tags: "agents, orchestration, multi-agent, agent-loops, crewai, autogen, swarm, coordination" allowed-tools:

  • Read
  • Glob
  • Grep
  • WebFetch
  • WebSearch

Agent Orchestration

Comprehensive patterns for building and coordinating AI agents -- from single-agent reasoning loops to multi-agent systems and framework selection. Coordination and multi-scenario categories have individual rule files in rules/ loaded on-demand; loop and framework tutorials live upstream (see Upstream coverage), with house defaults in references/ork-delta.md.

CC native /workflows (2.1.154): Claude Code now ships dynamic workflows — ask Claude to create a workflow and it orchestrates tens-to-hundreds of agents in the background; view runs with /workflows. This is complementary to the patterns here: use CC /workflows for large-scale, fire-and-forget background fan-out (you check back later); use the bounded foreground Agent Teams / Task-tool patterns below when ≤8 agents must coordinate within a single skill invocation via shared memory (handoff files, mesh messaging). Different scale, not a replacement.

Ask only when genuinely blocked (CC 2.1.154): CC now reserves the multiple-choice question prompt for decisions it genuinely cannot make itself, rather than asking when it already has enough context to proceed. When orchestrating agents, don't gate progress on an AskUserQuestion the lead can resolve from available context — reserve prompts for true branch points (irreversible actions, missing requirements). This complements ork's voice-friendly decision guidance.

Quick Reference

CategoryRulesImpactWhen to Use
Agent LoopsupstreamHIGHReAct reasoning, plan-and-execute, self-correction
Multi-Agent Coordination2CRITICALSupervisor routing, agent debate, result synthesis
Alternative FrameworksupstreamHIGHCrewAI crews, AutoGen teams, framework comparison
Multi-Scenario2MEDIUMParallel scenario orchestration, difficulty routing

Total: 4 rules across 4 categories. Loop and framework tutorials moved to first-party sources; the rescued house defaults live in references/ork-delta.md.

Quick Start

# ReAct agent loop
async def react_loop(question: str, tools: dict, max_steps: int = 10) -> str:
    history = REACT_PROMPT.format(tools=list(tools.keys()), question=question)
    for step in range(max_steps):
        response = await llm.chat([{"role": "user", "content": history}])
        if "Final Answer:" in response.content:
            return response.content.split("Final Answer:")[-1].strip()
        if "Action:" in response.content:
            action = parse_action(response.content)
            result = await tools[action.name](*action.args)
            history += f"\nObservation: {result}\n"
    return "Max steps reached without answer"
# Supervisor with fan-out/fan-in
async def multi_agent_analysis(content: str) -> dict:
    agents = [("security", security_agent), ("perf", perf_agent)]
    tasks = [agent(content) for _, agent in agents]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)
    return await synthesize_findings(results)

Agent Loops

Patterns for autonomous LLM reasoning: ReAct (Reasoning + Acting), Plan-and-Execute with replanning, self-correction loops, and sliding-window memory management.

Key decisions: Max steps 5-15, temperature 0.3-0.7, memory window 10-20 messages.

Multi-Agent Coordination

Fan-out/fan-in parallelism, supervisor routing with dependency ordering, conflict resolution (confidence-based or LLM arbitration), result synthesis, and CC Agent Teams (mesh topology for peer messaging in CC 2.1.33+).

Key decisions: 3-8 specialists, parallelize independent agents. Pick one of three modes: the Agent tool (star) for simple work, Agent Teams (mesh) for cross-cutting concerns, and a Workflow for large background fan-out you check back on later.

Alternative Frameworks

CrewAI hierarchical crews with Flows (1.8+), OpenAI Agents SDK handoffs and guardrails (0.12+), Microsoft Agent Framework (AutoGen + SK merger), GPT-5.2-Codex for long-horizon coding, and AG2 for open-source flexibility.

Key decisions: Match framework to team expertise + use case. LangGraph for state machines, CrewAI for role-based teams, OpenAI SDK for handoff workflows, MS Agent for enterprise compliance.

Multi-Scenario

Orchestrate a single skill across 3 parallel scenarios (simple/medium/complex) with progressive difficulty scaling (1x/3x/8x), milestone synchronization, and cross-scenario result aggregation.

Key decisions: Free-running with checkpoints, always 3 scenarios, 1x/3x/8x exponential scaling, 30s/90s/300s time budgets.

Upstream coverage (do not restate)

Local tutorials for these topics were retired; consult the first-party source and keep only house deltas in references/ork-delta.md.

TopicFirst-party source
ReAct / plan-and-execute / self-correction loop implementationsOpenAI function calling guide (https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/function-calling); LangGraph tutorials (context7: /langchain-ai/langgraph)
Fan-out coordination, result-synthesis boilerplate, and the generic multi-agent design checklistPython asyncio docs (https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html); Anthropic "Building effective agents" (https://www.anthropic.com/research/building-effective-agents); ork:langgraph supervisor patterns
CrewAI (crews, Flows, MCP tools, guardrails)CrewAI docs (https://docs.crewai.com); context7: /crewaiinc/crewai
OpenAI Agents SDK (handoffs, sessions, guardrails, MCP)https://openai.github.io/openai-agents-python/ ; context7: /openai/openai-agents-python
Microsoft Agent Framework / AutoGen (teams, termination, A2A)https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/ ; context7: /microsoft/autogen
GPT-5.2-Codex capabilities, pricing, IDE integrationsOpenAI model docs (https://platform.openai.com/docs/models)
Multi-scenario state machine, architecture and skill-agnostic template deep-divesSuperseded in-skill by rules/scenario-orchestrator.md and rules/scenario-routing.md

References

  • references/ork-delta.md - House defaults and dated decisions rescued from retired tutorials
  • references/framework-comparison.md - Condensed framework decision matrix and use-case table
  • references/langgraph-implementation.md - LangGraph 1.2+ implementation of the multi-scenario orchestrator
  • references/claude-code-instance-management.md - Running 3 parallel Claude Code instances for scenario demos

Key Decisions

DecisionRecommendation
Single vs multi-agentSingle for focused tasks, multi for decomposable work
Max loop steps5-15 (prevent infinite loops)
Agent count3-8 specialists per workflow
FrameworkMatch to team expertise + use case
TopologyAgent tool (star) for simple; Agent Teams (mesh) for complex; Workflow for large background fan-out
Scenario countAlways 3: simple, medium, complex

Common Mistakes

  • No step limit in agent loops (infinite loops)
  • No memory management (context overflow)
  • No error isolation in multi-agent (one failure crashes all)
    • Note (CC 2.1.161): parallel tool calls now fail independently — a failed Bash no longer cancels siblings in the same batch. This caveat still applies at the agent-orchestration level, not to tool batches; claude agents rows now show done/total for fanned-out work.
    • Note (CC 2.1.157): claude agents honors the agent field in settings.json for dispatched sessions; --agent <name> overrides it — pin the agent type explicitly when dispatching.
  • Missing synthesis step (raw agent outputs not useful)
  • Mixing frameworks in one project (complexity explosion)
  • Using Agent Teams for simple sequential work (use the Agent tool)
  • Sequential instead of parallel scenarios (defeats purpose)

Related Skills

  • ork:langgraph - LangGraph workflow patterns (supervisor, routing, state)
  • function-calling - Tool definitions and execution
  • ork:task-dependency-patterns - Task management with Agent Teams workflow

Capability Details

react-loop

Keywords: react, reason, act, observe, loop, agent Solves:

  • Implement ReAct pattern
  • Create reasoning loops
  • Build iterative agents

plan-execute

Keywords: plan, execute, replan, multi-step, autonomous Solves:

  • Create plan then execute steps
  • Implement replanning on failure
  • Build goal-oriented agents

supervisor-coordination

Keywords: supervisor, route, coordinate, fan-out, fan-in, parallel Solves:

  • Route tasks to specialized agents
  • Run agents in parallel
  • Aggregate multi-agent results

agent-debate

Keywords: debate, conflict, resolution, arbitration, consensus Solves:

  • Resolve agent disagreements
  • Implement LLM arbitration
  • Handle conflicting outputs

result-synthesis

Keywords: synthesize, combine, aggregate, merge, summary Solves:

  • Combine outputs from multiple agents
  • Create executive summaries
  • Score confidence across findings

crewai-patterns

Keywords: crewai, crew, hierarchical, delegation, role-based, flows Solves:

  • Build role-based agent teams
  • Implement hierarchical coordination
  • Use Flows for event-driven orchestration

autogen-patterns

Keywords: autogen, microsoft, agent framework, teams, enterprise, a2a Solves:

  • Build enterprise agent systems
  • Use AutoGen/SK merged framework
  • Implement A2A protocol

framework-selection

Keywords: choose, compare, framework, decision, which, crewai, autogen, openai Solves:

  • Select appropriate framework
  • Compare framework capabilities
  • Match framework to requirements

scenario-orchestrator

Keywords: scenario, parallel, fan-out, difficulty, progressive, demo Solves:

  • Run skill across multiple difficulty levels
  • Implement parallel scenario execution
  • Aggregate cross-scenario results

scenario-routing

Keywords: route, synchronize, milestone, checkpoint, scaling Solves:

  • Route tasks by difficulty level
  • Synchronize at milestones
  • Scale inputs progressively