PluginBench
Skill
Review
Audit score 70

m13-domain-error

zhanghandong/rust-skills

How to install m13-domain-error

npx skills add https://github.com/zhanghandong/rust-skills --skill m13-domain-error
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline
Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from zhanghandong/rust-skills.


name: m13-domain-error description: "Use when designing domain error handling. Keywords: domain error, error categorization, recovery strategy, retry, fallback, domain error hierarchy, user-facing vs internal errors, error code design, circuit breaker, graceful degradation, resilience, error context, backoff, retry with backoff, error recovery, transient vs permanent error, 领域错误, 错误分类, 恢复策略, 重试, 熔断器, 优雅降级" user-invocable: false

Domain Error Strategy

Layer 2: Design Choices

Core Question

Who needs to handle this error, and how should they recover?

Before designing error types:

  • Is this user-facing or internal?
  • Is recovery possible?
  • What context is needed for debugging?

Error Categorization

Error TypeAudienceRecoveryExample
User-facingEnd usersGuide actionInvalidEmail, NotFound
InternalDevelopersDebug infoDatabaseError, ParseError
SystemOps/SREMonitor/alertConnectionTimeout, RateLimited
TransientAutomationRetryNetworkError, ServiceUnavailable
PermanentHumanInvestigateConfigInvalid, DataCorrupted

Thinking Prompt

Before designing error types:

  1. Who sees this error?

    • End user → friendly message, actionable
    • Developer → detailed, debuggable
    • Ops → structured, alertable
  2. Can we recover?

    • Transient → retry with backoff
    • Degradable → fallback value
    • Permanent → fail fast, alert
  3. What context is needed?

    • Call chain → anyhow::Context
    • Request ID → structured logging
    • Input data → error payload

Trace Up ↑

To domain constraints (Layer 3):

"How should I handle payment failures?"
    ↑ Ask: What are the business rules for retries?
    ↑ Check: domain-fintech (transaction requirements)
    ↑ Check: SLA (availability requirements)
QuestionTrace ToAsk
Retry policydomain-*What's acceptable latency for retry?
User experiencedomain-*What message should users see?
Compliancedomain-*What must be logged for audit?

Trace Down ↓

To implementation (Layer 1):

"Need typed errors"
    ↓ m06-error-handling: thiserror for library
    ↓ m04-zero-cost: Error enum design

"Need error context"
    ↓ m06-error-handling: anyhow::Context
    ↓ Logging: tracing with fields

"Need retry logic"
    ↓ m07-concurrency: async retry patterns
    ↓ Crates: tokio-retry, backoff

Quick Reference

Recovery PatternWhenImplementation
RetryTransient failuresexponential backoff
FallbackDegraded modecached/default value
Circuit BreakerCascading failuresfailsafe-rs
TimeoutSlow operationstokio::time::timeout
BulkheadIsolationseparate thread pools

Error Hierarchy

#[derive(thiserror::Error, Debug)]
pub enum AppError {
    // User-facing
    #[error("Invalid input: {0}")]
    Validation(String),

    // Transient (retryable)
    #[error("Service temporarily unavailable")]
    ServiceUnavailable(#[source] reqwest::Error),

    // Internal (log details, show generic)
    #[error("Internal error")]
    Internal(#[source] anyhow::Error),
}

impl AppError {
    pub fn is_retryable(&self) -> bool {
        matches!(self, Self::ServiceUnavailable(_))
    }
}

Retry Pattern

use tokio_retry::{Retry, strategy::ExponentialBackoff};

async fn with_retry<F, T, E>(f: F) -> Result<T, E>
where
    F: Fn() -> impl Future<Output = Result<T, E>>,
    E: std::fmt::Debug,
{
    let strategy = ExponentialBackoff::from_millis(100)
        .max_delay(Duration::from_secs(10))
        .take(5);

    Retry::spawn(strategy, || f()).await
}

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy WrongBetter
Same error for allNo actionabilityCategorize by audience
Retry everythingWasted resourcesOnly transient errors
Infinite retryDoS selfMax attempts + backoff
Expose internal errorsSecurity riskUser-friendly messages
No contextHard to debug.context() everywhere

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy BadBetter
String errorsNo structurethiserror types
panic! for recoverableBad UXResult with context
Ignore errorsSilent failuresLog or propagate
Box<dyn Error> everywhereLost type infothiserror
Error in happy pathPerformanceEarly validation

Related Skills

WhenSee
Error handling basicsm06-error-handling
Retry implementationm07-concurrency
Domain modelingm09-domain
User-facing APIsdomain-*

Related skills

More from zhanghandong/rust-skills and the wider catalog.

M1

m15-anti-pattern

zhanghandong/rust-skills

Use when reviewing code for anti-patterns. Keywords: anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall, code smell, bad practice, code review, is this an anti-pattern, better way to do this, common mistake to avoid, why is this bad, idiomatic way, beginner mistake, fighting borrow checker, clone everywhere, unwrap in production, should I refactor, 反模式, 常见错误, 代码异味, 最佳实践, 地道写法

5.6k installsAudited
CO

coding-guidelines

zhanghandong/rust-skills

Use when asking about Rust code style or best practices. Keywords: naming, formatting, comment, clippy, rustfmt, lint, code style, best practice, P.NAM, G.FMT, code review, naming convention, variable naming, function naming, type naming, 命名规范, 代码风格, 格式化, 最佳实践, 代码审查, 怎么命名

1.2k installsAudited
M1

m10-performance

zhanghandong/rust-skills

CRITICAL: Use for performance optimization. Triggers: performance, optimization, benchmark, profiling, flamegraph, criterion, slow, fast, allocation, cache, SIMD, make it faster, 性能优化, 基准测试

881 installs
M0

m07-concurrency

zhanghandong/rust-skills

CRITICAL: Use for concurrency/async. Triggers: E0277 Send Sync, cannot be sent between threads, thread, spawn, channel, mpsc, Mutex, RwLock, Atomic, async, await, Future, tokio, deadlock, race condition, 并发, 线程, 异步, 死锁

831 installs
M0

m06-error-handling

zhanghandong/rust-skills

CRITICAL: Use for error handling. Triggers: Result, Option, Error, ?, unwrap, expect, panic, anyhow, thiserror, when to panic vs return Result, custom error, error propagation, 错误处理, Result 用法, 什么时候用 panic

810 installs
RU

rust-refactor-helper

zhanghandong/rust-skills

Safe Rust refactoring with LSP analysis. Triggers on: /refactor, rename symbol, move function, extract, 重构, 重命名, 提取函数, 安全重构

806 installs