How to install m13-domain-error
npx skills add https://github.com/zhanghandong/rust-skills --skill m13-domain-errorFull instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from zhanghandong/rust-skills.
name: m13-domain-error description: "Use when designing domain error handling. Keywords: domain error, error categorization, recovery strategy, retry, fallback, domain error hierarchy, user-facing vs internal errors, error code design, circuit breaker, graceful degradation, resilience, error context, backoff, retry with backoff, error recovery, transient vs permanent error, 领域错误, 错误分类, 恢复策略, 重试, 熔断器, 优雅降级" user-invocable: false
Domain Error Strategy
Layer 2: Design Choices
Core Question
Who needs to handle this error, and how should they recover?
Before designing error types:
- Is this user-facing or internal?
- Is recovery possible?
- What context is needed for debugging?
Error Categorization
| Error Type | Audience | Recovery | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| User-facing | End users | Guide action | InvalidEmail, NotFound |
| Internal | Developers | Debug info | DatabaseError, ParseError |
| System | Ops/SRE | Monitor/alert | ConnectionTimeout, RateLimited |
| Transient | Automation | Retry | NetworkError, ServiceUnavailable |
| Permanent | Human | Investigate | ConfigInvalid, DataCorrupted |
Thinking Prompt
Before designing error types:
-
Who sees this error?
- End user → friendly message, actionable
- Developer → detailed, debuggable
- Ops → structured, alertable
-
Can we recover?
- Transient → retry with backoff
- Degradable → fallback value
- Permanent → fail fast, alert
-
What context is needed?
- Call chain → anyhow::Context
- Request ID → structured logging
- Input data → error payload
Trace Up ↑
To domain constraints (Layer 3):
"How should I handle payment failures?"
↑ Ask: What are the business rules for retries?
↑ Check: domain-fintech (transaction requirements)
↑ Check: SLA (availability requirements)
| Question | Trace To | Ask |
|---|---|---|
| Retry policy | domain-* | What's acceptable latency for retry? |
| User experience | domain-* | What message should users see? |
| Compliance | domain-* | What must be logged for audit? |
Trace Down ↓
To implementation (Layer 1):
"Need typed errors"
↓ m06-error-handling: thiserror for library
↓ m04-zero-cost: Error enum design
"Need error context"
↓ m06-error-handling: anyhow::Context
↓ Logging: tracing with fields
"Need retry logic"
↓ m07-concurrency: async retry patterns
↓ Crates: tokio-retry, backoff
Quick Reference
| Recovery Pattern | When | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Retry | Transient failures | exponential backoff |
| Fallback | Degraded mode | cached/default value |
| Circuit Breaker | Cascading failures | failsafe-rs |
| Timeout | Slow operations | tokio::time::timeout |
| Bulkhead | Isolation | separate thread pools |
Error Hierarchy
#[derive(thiserror::Error, Debug)]
pub enum AppError {
// User-facing
#[error("Invalid input: {0}")]
Validation(String),
// Transient (retryable)
#[error("Service temporarily unavailable")]
ServiceUnavailable(#[source] reqwest::Error),
// Internal (log details, show generic)
#[error("Internal error")]
Internal(#[source] anyhow::Error),
}
impl AppError {
pub fn is_retryable(&self) -> bool {
matches!(self, Self::ServiceUnavailable(_))
}
}
Retry Pattern
use tokio_retry::{Retry, strategy::ExponentialBackoff};
async fn with_retry<F, T, E>(f: F) -> Result<T, E>
where
F: Fn() -> impl Future<Output = Result<T, E>>,
E: std::fmt::Debug,
{
let strategy = ExponentialBackoff::from_millis(100)
.max_delay(Duration::from_secs(10))
.take(5);
Retry::spawn(strategy, || f()).await
}
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why Wrong | Better |
|---|---|---|
| Same error for all | No actionability | Categorize by audience |
| Retry everything | Wasted resources | Only transient errors |
| Infinite retry | DoS self | Max attempts + backoff |
| Expose internal errors | Security risk | User-friendly messages |
| No context | Hard to debug | .context() everywhere |
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better |
|---|---|---|
| String errors | No structure | thiserror types |
| panic! for recoverable | Bad UX | Result with context |
| Ignore errors | Silent failures | Log or propagate |
| Box<dyn Error> everywhere | Lost type info | thiserror |
| Error in happy path | Performance | Early validation |
Related Skills
| When | See |
|---|---|
| Error handling basics | m06-error-handling |
| Retry implementation | m07-concurrency |
| Domain modeling | m09-domain |
| User-facing APIs | domain-* |
Related skills
More from zhanghandong/rust-skills and the wider catalog.
m15-anti-pattern
Use when reviewing code for anti-patterns. Keywords: anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall, code smell, bad practice, code review, is this an anti-pattern, better way to do this, common mistake to avoid, why is this bad, idiomatic way, beginner mistake, fighting borrow checker, clone everywhere, unwrap in production, should I refactor, 反模式, 常见错误, 代码异味, 最佳实践, 地道写法
coding-guidelines
Use when asking about Rust code style or best practices. Keywords: naming, formatting, comment, clippy, rustfmt, lint, code style, best practice, P.NAM, G.FMT, code review, naming convention, variable naming, function naming, type naming, 命名规范, 代码风格, 格式化, 最佳实践, 代码审查, 怎么命名
m10-performance
CRITICAL: Use for performance optimization. Triggers: performance, optimization, benchmark, profiling, flamegraph, criterion, slow, fast, allocation, cache, SIMD, make it faster, 性能优化, 基准测试
m07-concurrency
CRITICAL: Use for concurrency/async. Triggers: E0277 Send Sync, cannot be sent between threads, thread, spawn, channel, mpsc, Mutex, RwLock, Atomic, async, await, Future, tokio, deadlock, race condition, 并发, 线程, 异步, 死锁
m06-error-handling
CRITICAL: Use for error handling. Triggers: Result, Option, Error, ?, unwrap, expect, panic, anyhow, thiserror, when to panic vs return Result, custom error, error propagation, 错误处理, Result 用法, 什么时候用 panic
rust-refactor-helper
Safe Rust refactoring with LSP analysis. Triggers on: /refactor, rename symbol, move function, extract, 重构, 重命名, 提取函数, 安全重构