PluginBench
Skill
Review
Audit score 70

clojure-review

metabase/metabase

Review Clojure/ClojureScript code against Metabase style standards and quality guidelines.

What is clojure-review?

Automated code reviewer for Clojure and ClojureScript changes in Metabase projects. Checks compliance with Metabase coding standards, naming conventions, documentation requirements, and structural patterns. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.

  • Validates naming conventions (kebab-case, side-effect `!` suffix, descriptive names)
  • Checks docstring presence and quality for public vars
  • Verifies code organization (privacy markers, function length, line limits)
  • Reviews test structure and naming patterns
  • Audits REST API endpoints for schema, parameter conventions, and test coverage
  • Validates MBQL usage and database patterns

How to install clojure-review

npx skills add https://github.com/metabase/metabase --skill clojure-review
Prerequisites
  • Access to Metabase repository or local checkout
  • Clojure code changes in diff or pull request format
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use clojure-review

  1. 1.Install the skill via the provided command
  2. 2.Provide the code diff or pull request containing Clojure/ClojureScript changes
  3. 3.The skill scans against Metabase style guide and community Clojure conventions
  4. 4.Review flagged violations and suggestions for compliance
  5. 5.Address only substantive issues; ignore trivial or correctly-formatted code

Use cases

Good for
  • Review pull requests containing Clojure/ClojureScript changes before merge
  • Audit new API endpoints for compliance with REST conventions and test coverage
  • Check refactored code for naming, documentation, and organization standards
  • Validate database model and query patterns in data layer changes
  • Inspect driver implementations for proper multimethod documentation and patterns
Who it's for
  • Clojure/ClojureScript developers contributing to Metabase
  • Code reviewers enforcing Metabase project standards
  • Maintainers ensuring consistency across OSS and enterprise modules

clojure-review FAQ

What style guides does this check against?

The Metabase Clojure style guide (included in the skill) and the community Clojure style guide (CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc if present in the working directory).

Will it flag missing parentheses or linter issues?

No. Linter issues like missing parentheses are caught by automated linters; this skill focuses on style violations, naming, documentation, and structural patterns that require human judgment.

Does it comment on correct code?

No. The skill only posts comments about actual violations or potential issues. It avoids congratulatory or confirmatory messages about properly-formatted code.

What naming conventions does it enforce?

kebab-case for all variables and functions, descriptive names (no abbreviations like `tbl`), nouns for pure functions, and `!` suffix for side-effect functions.

Does it check API endpoints?

Yes. It validates response schemas, query parameter conventions (kebab-case), route naming (singular nouns), test coverage, and ensures GET requests have no side effects.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from metabase/metabase.


name: clojure-review description: Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code. allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Bash, Glob

Clojure Code Review Skill

@./../_shared/clojure-style-guide.md @./../_shared/clojure-commands.md

Review guidelines

What to flag:

  • Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above)
  • If CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc exists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style guide
  • Flag all style guide violations

What NOT to post:

  • Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines
  • Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly
  • Only post comments about style violations or potential issues

Example bad code review comments to avoid:

This TODO comment is properly formatted with author and date - nice work!

Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior.

The kondo ignore comment is appropriately placed here

Test name properly ends with -test as required by the style guide.

Special cases:

  • Do not post comments about missing parentheses (these will be caught by the linter)

Quick review checklist

Use this to scan through changes efficiently:

Naming

  • Descriptive names (no tbl, zs')
  • Pure functions named as nouns describing their return value
  • kebab-case for all variables and functions
  • Side-effect functions end with !
  • No namespace-alias repetition in function names

Documentation

  • Public vars in src or enterprise/backend/src have useful docstrings
  • Docstrings use Markdown conventions
  • References use [[other-var]] not backticks
  • TODO comments include author and date: ;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description

Docstring content — check every new or rewritten docstring against the anti-pattern table in the style guide above. Read the diff's docstrings on their own, separately from the code: prose is where review attention slides off, and a long docstring reads as diligence rather than as the liability it usually is.

Code Organization

  • Everything ^:private unless used elsewhere
  • No declare when avoidable (public functions near end)
  • Functions under 20 lines when possible
  • No blank, non-comment lines within definition forms (except pairwise constructs in let/cond)
  • Lines ≤ 120 characters

Tests

  • Separate deftest forms for distinct test cases
  • Pure tests marked ^:parallel
  • Test names end in -test or -test-<number>

Modules

  • Correct module patterns (OSS: metabase.<module>.*, EE: metabase-enterprise.<module>.*)
  • API endpoints in <module>.api namespaces
  • Public API in <module>.core with Potemkin
  • No cheating module linters with :clj-kondo/ignore [:metabase/modules]

REST API

  • Response schemas present (:- <schema>)
  • Query params use kebab-case, bodies use snake_case
  • Routes use singular nouns (e.g., /api/dashboard/:id)
  • GET has no side effects (except analytics)
  • Malli schemas detailed and complete
  • All new endpoints have tests

MBQL

  • No raw MBQL manipulation outside lib, lib-be, or query-processor modules
  • Uses Lib and MBQL 5, not legacy MBQL

Database

  • Model and table names are singular nouns
  • Uses t2/select-one-fn instead of selecting full rows for one column
  • Logic in Toucan methods, not helper functions

Drivers

  • New multimethods documented in docs/developers-guide/driver-changelog.md
  • Passes driver argument to other driver methods (no hardcoded driver names)
  • Minimal logic in read-column-thunk

Miscellaneous

  • Example data is bird-themed when possible
  • Kondo linter suppressions use proper format (not #_:clj-kondo/ignore keyword form)

Pattern matching table

Quick scan for common issues:

PatternIssue
calculate-age, get-userPure functions should be nouns: age, user
update-db, save-modelMissing ! for side effects: update-db!, save-model!
snake_case_varShould use kebab-case
Public var without docstringAdd docstring explaining purpose
;; TODO fix thisMissing author/date: ;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description
(defn foo ...) in namespace used elsewhereShould be (defn ^:private foo ...)
Function > 20 linesConsider breaking up into smaller functions
/api/dashboards/:idUse singular: /api/dashboard/:id
Query params with snake_caseUse kebab-case for query params
New API endpoint without testsAdd tests for the endpoint

Feedback format examples

For style violations:

This pure function should be named as a noun describing its return value. Consider user instead of get-user.

For missing documentation:

This public var needs a docstring explaining its purpose, inputs, and outputs.

For docstrings documenting code they don't own:

This describes how lib decides binning strategies internally. Nothing here fails when that changes, so it will go stale silently — drop it and let available-binning-strategies answer for its own behavior.

For docstring content that belongs in the body:

This paragraph explains why the branches are ordered this way, which is what someone editing the cond needs — but a caller can't act on it. Move it to an inline comment above the cond.

For organization issues:

This function is only used in this namespace, so it should be marked ^:private.

For API conventions:

Query parameters should use kebab-case. Change user_id to user-id.