gepetto
softaworks/agent-toolkit
Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review.
What is gepetto?
Gepetto orchestrates a multi-step planning process that transforms a feature spec into a comprehensive, reviewed implementation plan. Use when you need thorough pre-implementation analysis with stakeholder input and external validation before building.
- Conducts codebase and web research on relevant technologies and patterns
- Runs structured stakeholder interviews to clarify requirements and constraints
- Synthesizes research and interviews into a complete specification
- Generates detailed, self-contained implementation plans
- Obtains external reviews from multiple LLM perspectives (Gemini, Codex)
- Integrates feedback and creates sectionized implementation guides with acceptance criteria
How to install gepetto
npx skills add https://github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill gepetto- A markdown spec file describing the feature to build (can be detailed or vague)
- Access to place the spec file in a directory where planning files will be saved
- For web research: WebSearch capability enabled
How to use gepetto
- 1.Create a markdown spec file describing what you want to build and place it in a planning directory
- 2.Run: /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md
- 3.Answer prompts about research needs (codebase and/or web research)
- 4.Participate in the structured interview about requirements, constraints, and context
- 5.Review the generated claude-plan.md and provide feedback when prompted
- 6.Review and approve the section index and implementation sections
- 7.Use the generated section files as implementation guides with acceptance criteria
Use cases
- Planning a complex feature that requires understanding existing codebase patterns and external technologies
- Gathering requirements from multiple stakeholders before committing to implementation
- Creating detailed handoff documentation for distributed teams or future developers
- Validating architectural decisions through external expert review before development starts
- Breaking down large features into independently implementable sections with clear dependencies
- Engineering leads planning major features
- Teams practicing specification-driven development
- Distributed teams needing detailed async handoff documentation
- Architects validating design decisions before implementation
- Project managers coordinating multi-stakeholder feature planning
gepetto FAQ
Delete the planning directory files (claude-research.md, claude-interview.md, etc.) and re-run /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md. Gepetto will detect no existing files and start from step 4.
Yes. At step 12, you can review and edit claude-plan.md directly. For help editing, open a separate Claude session—the current session is mid-workflow and will continue once you confirm you're done.
Each section file is completely self-contained with background, requirements, dependencies, implementation details, acceptance criteria (checkboxes), and a list of files to create/modify. Implementers should not need to reference other documents.
Gepetto launches two subagents (Gemini and Codex) in parallel to review the plan. Their feedback is saved to the reviews/ directory, then you decide what to integrate into claude-integration-notes.md and the updated plan.
Yes. Run /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md again. Gepetto scans for existing planning files and resumes from the appropriate step, or completes if all steps are done.
Full instructions (SKILL.md)
Source of truth, from softaworks/agent-toolkit.
name: gepetto description: Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.
Gepetto
Orchestrates a multi-step planning process: Research → Interview → Spec Synthesis → Plan → External Review → Sections
CRITICAL: First Actions
BEFORE anything else, do these in order:
1. Print Intro
Print intro banner immediately:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: AI-Assisted Implementation Planning
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Research → Interview → Spec Synthesis → Plan → External Review → Sections
Note: GEPETTO will write many .md files to the planning directory you pass it
2. Validate Spec File Input
Check if user provided @file at invocation AND it's a spec file (ends with .md).
If NO @file was provided OR the path doesn't end with .md, output this and STOP:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: Spec File Required
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
This skill requires a markdown spec file path (must end with .md).
The planning directory is inferred from the spec file's parent directory.
To start a NEW plan:
1. Create a markdown spec file describing what you want to build
2. It can be as detailed or as vague as you like
3. Place it in a directory where gepetto can save planning files
4. Run: /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md
To RESUME an existing plan:
1. Run: /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md
Example: /gepetto @planning/my-feature-spec.md
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Do not continue. Wait for user to re-invoke with a .md file path.
3. Setup Planning Session
Determine session state by checking existing files:
-
Set
planning_dir= parent directory of the spec file -
Set
initial_file= the spec file path -
Scan for existing planning files:
claude-research.mdclaude-interview.mdclaude-spec.mdclaude-plan.mdclaude-integration-notes.mdclaude-ralph-loop-prompt.mdclaude-ralphy-prd.mdreviews/directorysections/directory
-
Determine mode and resume point:
| Files Found | Mode | Resume From |
|---|---|---|
| None | new | Step 4 |
| research only | resume | Step 6 (interview) |
| research + interview | resume | Step 8 (spec synthesis) |
| + spec | resume | Step 9 (plan) |
| + plan | resume | Step 10 (external review) |
| + reviews | resume | Step 11 (integrate) |
| + integration-notes | resume | Step 12 (user review) |
| + sections/index.md | resume | Step 14 (write sections) |
| all sections complete | resume | Step 15 (execution files) |
| + claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md + claude-ralphy-prd.md | complete | Done |
- Create TODO list with TodoWrite based on current state
Print status:
Planning directory: {planning_dir}
Mode: {mode}
If resuming:
Resuming from step {N}
To start fresh, delete the planning directory files.
Logging Format
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
STEP {N}/17: {STEP_NAME}
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
{details}
Step {N} complete: {summary}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Workflow
4. Research Decision
See research-protocol.md.
- Read the spec file
- Extract potential research topics (technologies, patterns, integrations)
- Ask user about codebase research needs
- Ask user about web research needs (present derived topics as multi-select)
- Record which research types to perform in step 5
5. Execute Research
See research-protocol.md.
Based on decisions from step 4, launch research subagents:
- Codebase research:
Task(subagent_type=Explore) - Web research:
Task(subagent_type=Explore)with WebSearch
If both are needed, launch both Task tools in parallel (single message with multiple tool calls).
Important: Subagents return their findings - they do NOT write files directly. After collecting results from all subagents, combine them and write to <planning_dir>/claude-research.md.
Skip this step entirely if user chose no research in step 4.
6. Detailed Interview
Run in main context (AskUserQuestion requires it). The interview should be informed by:
- The initial spec
- Research findings (if any)
7. Save Interview Transcript
Write Q&A to <planning_dir>/claude-interview.md
8. Write Initial Spec (Spec Synthesis)
Combine into <planning_dir>/claude-spec.md:
- Initial input (the spec file)
- Research findings (if step 5 was done)
- Interview answers (from step 6)
This synthesizes the user's raw requirements into a complete specification.
9. Generate Implementation Plan
Create detailed plan → <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md
IMPORTANT: Write for an unfamiliar reader. The plan must be fully self-contained - an engineer or LLM with no prior context should understand what we're building, why, and how just from reading this document.
10. External Review
Launch TWO subagents in parallel to review the plan:
- Gemini via Bash
- Codex via Bash
Both receive the plan content and return their analysis. Write results to <planning_dir>/reviews/.
11. Integrate External Feedback
Analyze the suggestions in <planning_dir>/reviews/.
You are the authority on what to integrate or not. It's OK if you decide to not integrate anything.
Step 1: Write <planning_dir>/claude-integration-notes.md documenting:
- What suggestions you're integrating and why
- What suggestions you're NOT integrating and why
Step 2: Update <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md with the integrated changes.
12. User Review of Integrated Plan
Use AskUserQuestion:
The plan has been updated with external feedback. You can now review and edit claude-plan.md.
If you want Claude's help editing the plan, open a separate Claude session - this session
is mid-workflow and can't assist with edits until the workflow completes.
When you're done reviewing, select "Done" to continue.
Options: "Done reviewing"
Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.
13. Create Section Index
See section-index.md
Read claude-plan.md. Identify natural section boundaries and create <planning_dir>/sections/index.md.
CRITICAL: index.md MUST start with a SECTION_MANIFEST block. See the reference for format requirements.
Write index.md before proceeding to section file creation.
14. Write Section Files — Parallel Subagents
Launch parallel subagents - one Task per section for maximum efficiency:
- First, parse
sections/index.mdto get the SECTION_MANIFEST list - Then launch ALL section Tasks in a single message (parallel execution):
# Launch all in ONE message for parallel execution:
Task(
subagent_type="general-purpose",
prompt="""
Write section file: section-01-{name}
Inputs:
- <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md
- <planning_dir>/sections/index.md
Output: <planning_dir>/sections/section-01-{name}.md
The section file must be COMPLETELY SELF-CONTAINED. Include:
- Background (why this section exists)
- Requirements (what must be true when complete)
- Dependencies (requires/blocks)
- Implementation details (from the plan)
- Acceptance criteria (checkboxes)
- Files to create/modify
The implementer should NOT need to reference any other document.
"""
)
Task(
subagent_type="general-purpose",
prompt="Write section file: section-02-{name} ..."
)
Task(
subagent_type="general-purpose",
prompt="Write section file: section-03-{name} ..."
)
# ... one Task per section in the manifest
Wait for ALL subagents to complete before proceeding.
15. Generate Execution Files — Subagent
Delegate to subagent to reduce main context token usage:
Task(
subagent_type="general-purpose",
prompt="""
Generate two execution files for autonomous implementation.
Input files:
- <planning_dir>/sections/index.md (has SECTION_MANIFEST)
- <planning_dir>/sections/section-*.md (all section files)
OUTPUT 1: <planning_dir>/claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md
For ralph-loop plugin. EMBED all section content inline.
Structure:
- Mission statement
- Full content of sections/index.md
- Full content of EACH section file (embedded, not referenced)
- Execution rules (dependency order, verify acceptance criteria)
- Completion signal: <promise>ALL-SECTIONS-COMPLETE</promise>
OUTPUT 2: <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md
For Ralphy CLI. REFERENCE section files (don't embed).
Structure:
- PRD header
- How to use (ralphy --prd command)
- Context explanation
- Checkbox task list: one "- [ ] Section NN: {name}" per section
Write both files.
"""
)
Wait for subagent completion before proceeding.
16. Final Status
Verify all files were created successfully:
- All section files from SECTION_MANIFEST
claude-ralph-loop-prompt.mdclaude-ralphy-prd.md
17. Output Summary
Print generated files and next steps:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: Planning Complete
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Generated files:
- claude-research.md (research findings)
- claude-interview.md (Q&A transcript)
- claude-spec.md (synthesized specification)
- claude-plan.md (implementation plan)
- claude-integration-notes.md (feedback decisions)
- reviews/ (external LLM feedback)
- sections/ (implementation units)
- claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md (for ralph-loop plugin)
- claude-ralphy-prd.md (for Ralphy CLI)
How to implement:
Option A - Manual (recommended for learning/control):
1. Read sections/index.md to understand dependencies
2. Implement each section file in order
3. Each section is self-contained with acceptance criteria
Option B - Autonomous with ralph-loop (Claude Code plugin):
/ralph-loop @<planning_dir>/claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md --completion-promise "COMPLETE" --max-iterations 100
Option C - Autonomous with Ralphy (external CLI):
ralphy --prd <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md
# Or: cp <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md ./PRD.md && ralphy
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Related skills
More from softaworks/agent-toolkit and the wider catalog.

humanizer
Remove AI-generated writing patterns to make text sound more natural and human.

lesson-learned
Extract software engineering lessons from your recent code changes via git history.

marp-slide
Create professional Marp presentation slides with 7 pre-designed themes and automatic quality improvements.

meme-factory
Generate memes using memegen.link API with 100+ templates and custom text styling.

mermaid-diagrams
Create professional software diagrams from text using Mermaid syntax.

naming-analyzer
Suggest better variable, function, and class names based on context and conventions.