alan-review-pr

name: alan-review-pr version: 1.0.0 description: Review a GitHub pull request using Alan's GitHub MCP tools

MANDATORY: Use Alan MCP Tools

The Alan MCP server provides GitHub tools that are ALREADY in your tool list. They work exactly like Read, Bash, Edit — you call them as tool invocations. They are named with the prefix mcp__alan__github_.

Authentication is handled automatically by the MCP server. You do NOT need GitHub tokens, gh CLI auth, SSH keys, .netrc files, environment variables, or any credentials. The tools work immediately with zero setup.

NEVER do any of the following for GitHub API access:

• curl or wget to api.github.com
• gh CLI commands (gh pr, gh api, etc.)
• env | grep or scanning for tokens/secrets
• cat ~/.netrc, git credential, or ssh -T git@github.com
• Any attempt to find, construct, or configure GitHub authentication
• Installing packages or CLIs for GitHub access

If an MCP tool call fails, report the error to the user. Do NOT fall back to CLI alternatives.

Verify tools are available

Before starting, confirm you can see mcp__alan__github_* tools in your available tools. If they are NOT available, STOP and tell the user: "The GitHub MCP tools are not available. Please check the sandbox MCP configuration."

Tool parameters

All GitHub PR tools require these parameters:

• owner (string): GitHub org or username, e.g. "supatest-ai"
• repo (string): Repository name, e.g. "alan"
• prNumber (integer): PR number, e.g. 42

Example tool call:

Tool: mcp__alan__github_get_pull_request
Parameters: { "owner": "supatest-ai", "repo": "alan", "prNumber": 42 }

Resolving owner/repo

If the user only provides a PR number, run git remote get-url origin to get the remote URL, then parse owner and repo from it. This is the ONLY git CLI command you should run for GitHub operations. Everything else uses MCP tools.

Available GitHub MCP tools

Task: Review a Pull Request

Input

The user will provide one of:

• A PR number (e.g. "42" or "#42")
• A PR URL (e.g. "https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/42")
• A reference like "owner/repo#42"

Workflow

1. Resolve owner/repo/prNumber from the input. If only a PR number is given, run git remote get-url origin to parse owner and repo.

2. Fetch PR metadata — call mcp__alan__github_get_pull_request with { owner, repo, prNumber } to get title, description, state, labels, branches.

3. Fetch the diff — call mcp__alan__github_get_pr_diff to get the unified diff.

4. Fetch changed files — call mcp__alan__github_list_pr_files to see files modified/added/deleted with line counts.

5. Fetch existing reviews — call mcp__alan__github_list_pr_reviews to see prior review state.

6. Fetch existing comments — call mcp__alan__github_list_pr_comments for ongoing discussion context.

7. Check CI status — call mcp__alan__github_get_ci_status with the head branch or SHA. If a check failed, include the html_url link so the user can view full logs (the tool does not return log output).

8. Read source files — for complex changes, use the Read tool to read full source files (not just the diff) for context.

9. Analyze — identify issues INTRODUCED by this PR only (not pre-existing). For each finding, determine: severity, file path, start/end line, title, description, and a concrete fix prompt for agents.

10. Post review — call mcp__alan__github_create_pr_review with inline comments (one per finding) plus a summary body. See formats below.

Review Dimensions (priority order)

1. Security — injection, auth bypass, secrets in code, input validation
2. Correctness — logic errors, null handling, async issues, race conditions
3. Performance — N+1 queries, unbounded operations, memory issues
4. Error Handling — silent failures, empty catch blocks, swallowed errors
5. Maintainability — functions >30 lines, deep nesting, magic numbers
6. Test Coverage — happy path tested? edge cases? meaningful assertions?

Confidence Filter

Only include findings where:

• You can point to exact file + line
• You can describe a concrete scenario where it causes a real problem
• Confidence >= 80%

Skip: linter-catchable issues, speculative risks, style preferences, pre-existing problems.

Inline Comment Format

Each finding becomes its own inline comment on the PR. Format the body of each comment like this:

<!-- alan-review-comment {"id": "alan_review_{prNumber}_{sequential_4digit}", "file_path": "{path}", "start_line": {start}, "end_line": {end}, "side": "RIGHT"} -->

{severity_icon} **{short_title}**

{detailed_description}

<details>
<summary>Prompt for agents</summary>

\`\`\`
{concrete_fix_instructions_an_AI_agent_can_execute — specify exact file, what to change, and how}
\`\`\`

</details>

<!-- alan-review-badge-begin -->
<a href="{alan_session_url}" target="_blank">
  <img src="https://app.tryalan.ai/logo.png" alt="Open in Alan" height="20">
</a>
<!-- alan-review-badge-end -->

Severity icons:

• 🔴 = Blocking (critical bugs, security, data loss — must fix before merge)
• 🟡 = Important (real bugs/risks — should fix before merge)
• 🔵 = Nit (minor quality issues — fix if easy)

Summary Comment Format

The body parameter of the review (top-level summary) should be:

**Alan Review** found {N} potential issues.

| Severity | Count |
|----------|-------|
| 🔴 Blocking | {X} |
| 🟡 Important | {Y} |
| 🔵 Nit | {Z} |

<details>
<summary>View all findings</summary>

### 🔴 Blocking
- **{title}** — \`{file_path}:{line}\` — {one_line_description}

### 🟡 Important
- **{title}** — \`{file_path}:{line}\` — {one_line_description}

### 🔵 Nit
- **{title}** — \`{file_path}:{line}\` — {one_line_description}

</details>

<!-- alan-review-badge-begin -->
<a href="{alan_session_url}" target="_blank">
  <img src="https://app.tryalan.ai/logo.png" alt="Open in Alan" height="20">
</a>
<!-- alan-review-badge-end -->

---
*Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.*

"Open in Alan" Badge URL

Every badge links to the current Alan session. The user/trigger will provide the session URL. Replace {alan_session_url} in every badge with the actual URL.

If no session URL is provided, fall back to https://app.tryalan.ai.

Posting the Review

Call mcp__alan__github_create_pr_review with:

• owner, repo, prNumber: from step 1
• body: the summary comment above
• event: "REQUEST_CHANGES" if any 🔴 blocking findings, otherwise "COMMENT"
• comments: array of inline comments, each with:
  • path: relative file path from repo root
  • line: the end line number of the finding
  • body: the formatted inline comment body above

IMPORTANT:

• Always post inline comments (one per finding) — do NOT bundle into one big comment
• Always include the "Prompt for agents" section in every finding
• Always include the "Open in Alan" badge on every comment and the summary
• Replace {alan_session_url} with the actual session URL in every badge
• If zero findings, post an approving review with a clean summary