alan-test-feature

---

name: alan-test-feature version: 1.1.1 description: Scope coverage, build a testing strategy, test the feature with agent-browser, capture screenshots/video (always mandatory), upload to S3, and create a structured test report (never skip)

Task: Test Feature & Generate Demo Report

Analyze the current branch's changes, scope the coverage level with the user, build an explicit testing strategy, start the app's dev server, test the feature in a real browser using agent-browser, capture screenshots and video (always — no exceptions), upload everything to S3, and generate a structured test report (always — never skip).

---

Phase 0: Environment Setup

1. Get artifact context IDs

Use the active task context when it is present in the prompt. Otherwise:

• The task ID is available from the ALAN_TASK_ID environment variable.
• The conversation ID is available from the ALAN_SESSION_ID environment variable.
• Resolve teamId with Alan MCP context/tools before creating the report.

When calling create_test_report, always pass taskId, conversationId, and teamId explicitly. Do not substitute one ID for another.

2. Verify agent-browser is available

agent-browser is a CLI tool by Vercel Labs (npm: agent-browser) — it is NOT a skill or MCP tool. It provides headless browser automation via bash commands (open, click, fill, screenshot, record). In sandboxes it is pre-installed by runtime-bootstrap.ts.

command -v agent-browser >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "agent-browser: OK" || echo "agent-browser: MISSING"

If missing, install it:

npm install -g agent-browser && agent-browser install

If installation fails (e.g. no network, no npm), STOP and tell the user:

"agent-browser is not available and could not be installed. Install it manually: npm install -g agent-browser && agent-browser install"

Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 without a working agent-browser — all browser testing depends on it.

3. Create workspace

All captures (screenshots, videos) MUST be written to /tmp/alan-captures/.

mkdir -p /tmp/alan-captures

CRITICAL — file path rules:

• ONLY write capture files to /tmp/alan-captures/. Never anywhere else.
• NEVER write to .claude/, project directories, reports/, or any path inside the repo.
• .claude/ is a sensitive system directory — writing to it will be blocked and will abort the test run.
• If you are tempted to create a reports/ or screenshots/ folder anywhere other than /tmp/, stop and use /tmp/alan-captures/ instead.

---

Phase 0.5: Coverage Scoping & Context Gathering (MANDATORY — do before anything else)

Never skip this phase. You must understand what the user wants before writing a single test step.

1. Ask about coverage level

Use AskUserQuestion to ask the user:

What level of test coverage do you want for this feature?

- light       — Happy path only. Quick smoke test to verify the main flow works.
- standard    — Happy path + key edge cases + basic error states. (Default)
- comprehensive — Full coverage: happy path, all edge cases, error states, non-happy paths, boundary values, accessibility, responsiveness.

Also: are there any specific flows, known bugs, or risky areas you want me to focus on?

Wait for the response before continuing.

2. Ask targeted follow-up questions

Based on the feature (which you may not know yet — do a quick git diff --stat first to get a hint), use AskUserQuestion to ask 1–3 targeted follow-up questions. Examples:

• "Is there an authenticated state I should test? If yes, what test credentials should I use?"
• "Are there any known edge cases or previous bugs related to this feature?"
• "What's the definition of 'working correctly' for this feature — what should I see?"
• "Are there any specific non-happy paths you're concerned about (e.g. invalid input, network errors, empty states)?"
• "Any pages or user roles I should specifically include or exclude?"

Do not skip questions if context is unclear. Ask. A well-scoped test is 10× more valuable than a blind one.

3. Confirm the plan

After gathering answers, summarize back to the user (no tool call needed — just a short message):

• Coverage level chosen
• Specific areas / flows to focus on
• Any known risks or edge cases to target
• Rough count of test scenarios expected

Only proceed to Phase 1 after this confirmation.

---

Phase 1: Discover What to Test

1. Analyze the branch

Run these commands to understand what changed:

git log main..HEAD --oneline 2>/dev/null || git log HEAD~5..HEAD --oneline
git diff main...HEAD --stat 2>/dev/null || git diff HEAD~1 --stat

Read the actual diff to understand the feature or bug fix. Identify:

• What part of the app is affected (which pages, components, API routes)
• What the expected behavior change is
• What URL path to navigate to for testing

2. Discover and start the dev server

Look at the project to figure out how to run it:

1. Read package.json — check scripts.dev, scripts.start, scripts.serve
2. Check for docker-compose.yml / docker-compose.yaml / compose.yml
3. Check for Makefile (look for dev or serve targets)
4. Check for Procfile, .env, Pipfile, requirements.txt, Gemfile
5. Check for framework-specific files: next.config.*, vite.config.*, nuxt.config.*, angular.json, manage.py, config/routes.rb

Start the dev server in the background. Common patterns:

# Node.js
npm run dev &
# or: pnpm dev &, yarn dev &, npx next dev &, npx vite &

# Python
python manage.py runserver &
# or: flask run &, uvicorn main:app &

# Ruby
bundle exec rails server &

# Docker
docker compose up -d

3. Wait for the server

Poll until the server is responding:

# Replace PORT with the discovered port
for i in $(seq 1 30); do
  curl -sf http://localhost:PORT >/dev/null 2>&1 && break
  sleep 2
done

Check common ports if unclear: 3000, 5173, 8080, 4200, 8000, 4000, 3001, 8888.

4. Determine the app URL

• Parse dev server stdout/stderr for "Local:" or "ready on" messages with URLs
• Check .env or .env.local for PORT or VITE_PORT or similar
• Test common ports with curl -sf http://localhost:PORT >/dev/null
• If you cannot determine it, ask the user via AskUserQuestion

5. Summarize before proceeding

Tell the user:

• What you found in the diff (feature/fix summary)
• What URL you will test
• What test scenarios you plan to cover

---

Phase 1.5: Build Testing Strategy & Create Todos (MANDATORY)

Before opening the browser, you must have an explicit plan. Do not improvise test steps on the fly.

1. Draft the testing strategy

Based on:

• The coverage level the user chose in Phase 0.5
• The diff analysis from Phase 1
• The context gathered from the user

Write out the full test plan as a structured list. For each scenario, note:

• Scenario name — short label (e.g. "Happy path: create item")
• Type — happy path / non-happy path / edge case / error state / visual / navigation
• Steps — what to do
• Expected outcome — what "pass" looks like
• Screenshot needed — yes/no

Coverage requirements by level:

• light: happy path only (1–3 scenarios)
• standard: happy path + 2–4 non-happy paths + 1–2 error states
• comprehensive: happy path + all non-happy paths + all error states + boundary values + empty states + responsiveness + navigation

Non-happy path examples to consider:

• Invalid / missing required inputs
• Submitting with no data / empty state
• Duplicate entries (if applicable)
• Permission denied / unauthorized access
• Network error / API failure simulation (if testable)
• Rapid repeated actions (double-click, spam submit)
• Long input strings / special characters
• Back button / browser navigation mid-flow

2. Create todos for each scenario

Use TodoWrite to create a todo entry for each test scenario so progress is tracked. Each todo should be the scenario name.

3. Present the strategy

Output the full testing strategy as a numbered list before proceeding. The user should be able to see exactly what will be tested before Phase 2 starts.

---

Phase 2: Test with agent-browser

agent-browser is a CLI tool — invoke it via bash, not as an MCP tool or skill. Docs: https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-browser Key commands: open, snapshot, click, fill, screenshot, record, wait, find, close

1. Open the app

agent-browser --session test-feature open http://localhost:PORT
agent-browser --session test-feature wait --load networkidle

2. Start video recording — MANDATORY

Always start a video recording before any interaction. No exceptions.

agent-browser --session test-feature record start /tmp/alan-captures/happy-path.webm

If video recording fails for technical reasons, note the failure but continue — screenshots are still required.

3. Take initial screenshot — MANDATORY

Always capture the initial page state before any interaction.

agent-browser --session test-feature screenshot /tmp/alan-captures/step-00-initial-state.png

4. Execute each scenario from the testing strategy

Work through every scenario defined in Phase 1.5. For each scenario:

• Mark the corresponding todo as in-progress
• Use agent-browser snapshot -i to discover interactive elements
• Use agent-browser click @eN, agent-browser fill @eN "text", etc. to interact
• Use agent-browser wait --load networkidle or agent-browser wait 1500 between actions
• Take a screenshot after every significant state change — never go more than 2 meaningful actions without a screenshot:

  agent-browser --session test-feature screenshot /tmp/alan-captures/step-NN-description.png
  

  Name screenshots descriptively: step-02-form-filled.png, step-03-submit-clicked.png, step-04-success-state.png
• Re-snapshot after navigation or DOM changes (refs go stale)
• If elements are hard to find by ref, use semantic locators:

  agent-browser --session test-feature find text "Submit" click
  agent-browser --session test-feature find role button click --name "Save"
  

• Mark each todo as complete or failed based on outcome

Mandatory coverage checklist (execute ALL that apply to the coverage level chosen):

Happy path (always required):

• Main feature flow works end-to-end as expected
• Success state / confirmation is visible
• Data is persisted / reflected correctly after action

Non-happy paths (required for standard + comprehensive):

• Empty / missing required inputs — form validation fires, error messages shown
• Invalid input values — correct rejection, no crash
• Boundary values — minimum and maximum accepted values
• Duplicate / conflicting data (if applicable)
• Unauthorized / permission-denied state (if applicable)
• Empty list / zero-state view (if applicable)
• Rapid repeated actions (double-click submit, spam button)
• Long strings / special characters in text inputs

Error states (required for standard + comprehensive):

• API / network failure behavior (if simulatable)
• Partial failure — what happens if only part of the action succeeds
• Graceful degradation — app does not crash, user sees a meaningful message

Visual & navigation (required for comprehensive):

• Layout is correct, no overflow or broken UI
• Responsive on narrower viewport (resize if possible)
• Links and navigation work; back button does not break state
• Loading states / spinners shown while async work is in progress

5. Stop recording and clean up

agent-browser --session test-feature record stop
agent-browser --session test-feature screenshot /tmp/alan-captures/final-state.png
agent-browser --session test-feature close

Keep the recording under 2 minutes. If the feature requires more exploration, split into multiple recordings (e.g. happy-path.webm, error-states.webm).

6. Fix WebM duration metadata (MANDATORY if ffmpeg is available)

WebM files recorded by agent-browser often have duration = Infinity in the container header — the video player then shows 0:00. Fix every .webm file by remuxing it through ffmpeg, which reads the entire file, computes the real duration, and writes it into the output header:

for f in /tmp/alan-captures/*.webm; do
  if command -v ffmpeg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    ffmpeg -y -i "$f" -c copy "${f%.webm}-fixed.webm" 2>/dev/null \
      && mv "${f%.webm}-fixed.webm" "$f" \
      || echo "ffmpeg remux failed for $f — uploading as-is"
  fi
done

If ffmpeg is not available, skip this step and continue — the video will still play, it just won't show the correct duration in the player.

---

Phase 3: Upload Captures to S3

For each captured file, use the mcp__alan__get_upload_url MCP tool to get a presigned S3 URL, then curl PUT the file directly to S3.

Per-file upload flow

1. Get the file size (needed by the MCP tool):

   SIZE=$(stat -c%s "/tmp/alan-captures/step-01.png" 2>/dev/null || stat -f%z "/tmp/alan-captures/step-01.png")
   

2. Call the MCP tool to get a presigned upload URL:

   Tool: mcp__alan__get_upload_url
   Parameters: {
     "taskId": "<active task ID or value of ALAN_TASK_ID>",
     "filename": "step-01.png",
     "mimeType": "image/png",
     "size": <SIZE from step 1>
   }
   

   Returns: { "uploadUrl": "https://...", "s3Key": "sandbox-captures/..." }

3. Upload the file to S3 using the presigned URL:

   curl -sf -X PUT "<uploadUrl>" \
     -H "Content-Type: image/png" \
     --data-binary @/tmp/alan-captures/step-01.png
   

4. Save the s3Key — you will pass it to create_test_report in Phase 4.

Repeat for each screenshot and video file. Common MIME types:

• Screenshots: image/png
• Video recordings: video/webm

If uploads fail: Continue to Phase 4 anyway — omit the screenshotUrl, videoUrl, and screenshotUrls fields. The structured report is still valuable without media.

---

Phase 4: Create Structured Test Report (MANDATORY — NEVER SKIP)

CRITICAL: You MUST call mcp__alan__create_test_report to complete this skill. This is non-negotiable.

• Do NOT output the report as markdown text
• Do NOT summarize findings in chat only
• Do NOT skip this phase for any reason — not because of time, not because uploads failed, not because testing was partial
• The report MUST be persisted via this MCP tool call so the UI renders it as an interactive artifact
• Skipping this step means the entire test session is wasted and untracked

If uploads failed in Phase 3, create the report anyway — omit the media URLs but include all steps, issues, and summary text.

Call the mcp__alan__create_test_report MCP tool with structured data from your testing.

Gather all the data from the previous phases and call the tool:

Tool: mcp__alan__create_test_report
Parameters: {
  "title": "<short description of what was tested>",
  "taskId": "<active task ID or value of ALAN_TASK_ID, if set>",
  "conversationId": "<active conversation ID or value of ALAN_SESSION_ID>",
  "teamId": "<resolved team ID>",
  "branch": "<current branch name from git>",
  "baseBranch": "main",
  "commits": [
    { "sha": "<commit sha>", "message": "<commit message>" }
  ],
  "changedFiles": [
    { "path": "src/components/Feature.tsx", "description": "Added new feature component" }
  ],
  "appUrl": "<the URL you tested>",
  "summary": "<1-2 paragraph summary of what was tested and the outcome>",
  "status": "pass | fail | mixed",
  "steps": [
    {
      "name": "Navigate to feature page",
      "status": "pass | fail | skip",
      "screenshotUrl": "<s3Key from Phase 3 — e.g. sandbox-captures/org/task/step-01.png — omit if upload failed>",
      "notes": "Page loaded correctly"
    }
  ],
  "issues": [
    {
      "title": "Button misaligned on mobile",
      "severity": "critical | high | medium | low",
      "description": "The submit button overflows on viewports < 375px",
      "screenshotUrl": "<s3Key from Phase 3 showing the issue — omit if upload failed>"
    }
  ],
  "videoUrl": "<s3Key from Phase 3 for the happy-path recording — omit if upload failed>",
  "screenshotUrls": ["<s3Key 1 from Phase 3>", "<s3Key 2 from Phase 3>"]
}

Field guidelines

• status: "pass" if all steps passed, "fail" if any critical step failed, "mixed" if some passed and some failed
• steps: one entry per distinct test action (navigate, click, fill, verify). Include the screenshot URL for that step if you took one.
• issues: only include actual problems found. Each issue should have a severity and clear description.
• screenshotUrls: flat list of ALL screenshot s3Keys from Phase 3 (for gallery display). Use the s3Key field returned by get_upload_url, not the uploadUrl. Omit if no uploads succeeded.
• commits and changedFiles: from git analysis in Phase 1

Output

After calling mcp__alan__create_test_report, tell the user:

• The test report title, so the user can find the generated artifact in the Alan UI
• A link to the artifact when you have enough context to form one (usually /teams/<teamId>/docs?artifactId=<artifactId>)
• A brief summary: what was tested, how many steps passed/failed, any issues found
• List any bugs or concerns discovered during testing

Do not lead with a raw UUID. Only include the artifact/report ID as secondary debug context if no usable title or link is available.

Do NOT render the full report as markdown. The MCP tool call creates the report as a structured artifact that the UI displays interactively.