PluginBench
Skill
Pass
Audit score 90

strengthen

zernie/vigiles

Upgrade vigiles guidance() rules to enforce() by matching existing linter rules.

What is strengthen?

Scans CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md specs for guidance() rules and finds backing linter rules (ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, Stylelint) to convert them to enforce(). Use this when asked to strengthen or harden vigiles specs; it is not for general linting or fixing lint errors.

  • Discovers enabled linter rules via npx vigiles generate types
  • Matches guidance() rules against existing linter rules in the project
  • Suggests direct replacements (Tier 1) that require no config changes
  • Identifies config-backed patterns (Tier 2) and plugin installs (Tier 3)
  • Applies safe changes in auto mode or presents all options in interactive mode
  • Verifies changes compile before committing

How to install strengthen

npx skills add https://github.com/zernie/vigiles --skill strengthen
Prerequisites
  • A vigiles-enabled project with a CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md spec file
  • At least one linter installed and configured (ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, or Stylelint)
  • npx vigiles CLI available in the project
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
Cline

How to use strengthen

  1. 1.Run the skill and choose auto or interactive mode when prompted
  2. 2.The skill runs npx vigiles generate types to discover enabled linter rules
  3. 3.Review the suggestions grouped by tier (direct replacements, config changes, plugin installs)
  4. 4.In auto mode: approve and the skill applies Tier 1 changes and commits; in interactive mode: select which suggestions to apply
  5. 5.Verify the updated spec compiles with npm run build && npx vigiles compile

Use cases

Good for
  • Convert a guidance rule about console usage to an ESLint enforce() rule when no-console is already enabled
  • Suggest adding no-restricted-imports config to enforce a "don't use moment.js" guidance rule
  • Identify that a cognitive-complexity guidance rule requires installing eslint-plugin-sonarjs before it can be enforced
  • Present all strengthening options (free wins, config edits, plugin installs) and let the user choose which to apply
  • Upgrade an entire spec file from soft guidance to hard enforcement where linter rules already exist
Who it's for
  • Developers maintaining vigiles specs and agent behavior rules
  • Teams hardening code standards by converting guidance to enforcement
  • Projects with existing linter configs who want to leverage them for spec compliance

strengthen FAQ

What's the difference between auto and interactive mode?

Auto mode applies all safe Tier 1 changes (direct replacements where the rule is already enabled) and commits them, presenting Tier 2–4 as a summary. Interactive mode shows all suggestions and lets you pick which ones to apply before any changes are made.

Will this edit my linter config or install plugins?

In auto mode, it only applies direct replacements; config edits and plugin installs are presented for your review. In interactive mode, it asks before making any config changes. It never silently modify config or install dependencies.

What if a guidance rule has no matching linter rule?

It stays as guidance (Tier 4). Custom-rule synthesis is a planned skill but not yet available. The skill will note these for future reference.

Can I use this for general linting or fixing lint errors?

No. This skill is specifically for upgrading vigiles specs from guidance() to enforce(). Use your linter directly (eslint, ruff, etc.) for general linting and error fixes.

What linters does this support?

ESLint, Stylelint, Ruff, Pylint, RuboCop, and Clippy. The skill only reads docs for linters your project actually uses.

Full instructions (SKILL.md)

Source of truth, from zernie/vigiles.


name: strengthen allowed-tools: Read, Edit, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash description: Upgrade a vigiles spec's guidance() rules to enforce() — scan the guidance rules in a CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md spec and find existing linter rules (ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, Stylelint) that back them. Use when asked to strengthen, harden, or make vigiles rules enforceable; NOT for general linting or fixing lint errors.

Scan spec files for guidance() rules and suggest enforce() replacements backed by real linter rules.

Principle: auto the free wins, nudge for the costs

The dividing line is cost, not strictness. A guidance() → enforce() swap where the linter rule already exists and is enabled is a pure win — free, reversible, no false-positive risk — so apply it (Tier 1 below). Anything that costs something — editing linter config, installing a plugin, or a change that could fail a clean CI — is the user's call: present it with the tradeoff spelled out and let them choose (Tiers 2–4). Never silently edit config, install a dependency, or escalate the repo into strict gating. This is the init enforcement model (structural = on by default, workflow/strict = opt-in) applied at edit time.

Instructions

Step 0: Choose Mode

Ask the user:

Auto or interactive?

  • Auto — I'll apply all safe changes (direct replacements where the rule is already enabled), commit, and show you the diff. Risky changes (require config edits or plugin installs) go in a summary for you to review.
  • Interactive — I'll present each suggestion and you pick which ones to apply.

Default to interactive if the user doesn't specify.

Step 1: Discover What's Installed

Run npx vigiles generate types to get the full list of enabled linter rules in the project. Read .vigiles/generated.d.ts to see every rule available across all detected linters.

Note which linter prefixes appear in the generated types (e.g., EslintRule, RuffRule). You'll only need reference docs for detected linters.

Step 2: Find All Guidance Rules

Find all .spec.ts files in the project (**/*.md.spec.ts). For each file, identify every guidance() rule.

Step 3: Match Against Generated Types (Fast Path)

For each guidance rule, check if an enabled rule in .vigiles/generated.d.ts directly matches. This is the fast, deterministic path — no doc reading needed.

Look for:

  • Exact rule name in text — guidance says "no-console" and no-console is in EslintRule
  • Semantic match — guidance says "don't use console.log" and no-console is available
  • Rule description match — guidance says "unused variables" and no-unused-vars or @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars is available

If a match is found and the rule is in the generated types (meaning it's already enabled), this is a direct replacement — no config changes needed.

Step 4: Read Linter Docs (Slow Path)

For guidance rules that didn't match in Step 3, read the linter reference docs for the project's detected linters:

  • ESLint → ../linter-docs/eslint.md
  • Stylelint → ../linter-docs/stylelint.md
  • Ruff → ../linter-docs/ruff.md
  • Pylint → ../linter-docs/pylint.md
  • RuboCop → ../linter-docs/rubocop.md
  • Clippy → ../linter-docs/clippy.md

Only read docs for linters the project actually uses. Skip docs for linters with no rules in generated types.

Check the plugin tables and decision matrices. The guidance text may describe a pattern covered by:

  • A plugin rule that's installed but not enabled
  • A plugin that's not installed yet
  • A no-restricted-* config pattern (see Step 4b)

Step 4b: no-restricted-* Patterns

Many guidance rules can be enforced via built-in linter config without a custom rule. This is the most common strengthen pattern — "don't do X" maps to a restriction config.

ESLint:

// "Don't import from internal modules"
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
  patterns: [{ group: ["src/internal/*"], message: "Use the public API." }]
}],

// "Don't call console.log"
"no-restricted-syntax": ["error", {
  selector: 'CallExpression[callee.object.name="console"]',
  message: "Use the project logger."
}],

// "Don't use moment.js"
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
  paths: [{ name: "moment", message: "Use dayjs instead." }]
}],

Ruff:

# "Don't use os.system"
[tool.ruff.lint.flake8-tidy-imports.banned-api]
"os.system".msg = "Use subprocess.run instead."

RuboCop:

# "Don't use puts in production" — if Rails/Output doesn't fit
Custom/NoPuts:
  Enabled: true

When suggesting a no-restricted-* change:

  1. Show the exact config edit needed (which file, which section)
  2. Show the enforce() rule that references it
  3. Note that this changes linter config, not just the spec

Step 5: Present Suggestions

Group the output into tiers:

Tier 1: Direct replacements (rule already enabled — zero risk)

// Before
"no-console": guidance("Use structured logger instead of console.log"),
// After
"no-console": enforce("eslint/no-console", "Use structured logger instead of console.log"),

Tier 2: Config-backed (rule exists but needs config options)

// Spec change:
"no-moment": enforce("eslint/no-restricted-imports", "Use dayjs instead of moment."),

// Config change needed (eslint.config.mjs):
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
  paths: [{ name: "moment", message: "Use dayjs instead." }]
}],

Tier 3: Plugin install needed

"cognitive-complexity": guidance("Keep functions simple")
→ Install eslint-plugin-sonarjs, enable sonarjs/cognitive-complexity
→ enforce("eslint/sonarjs/cognitive-complexity", "Keep functions simple")

Tier 4: No match (stays as guidance — candidate for a future rule-synthesis skill)

"research-first": guidance("Google unfamiliar APIs first.")
→ No linter rule can enforce this. Stays as guidance for now.
→ (Custom-rule synthesis is planned but not yet shipped.)

Step 6: Apply Changes

In auto mode:

  1. Apply all Tier 1 changes (edit spec files, replace guidance() with enforce())
  2. Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify each change compiles
  3. If any compilation fails, revert that specific change and report the error
  4. Commit all successful changes
  5. Present Tier 2-4 as a summary for the user to review

In interactive mode:

  1. Present all tiers
  2. Ask the user which suggestions to apply
  3. For approved Tier 2 changes: edit the linter config, then edit the spec
  4. Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify
  5. If compilation fails, report the error and revert

For Tier 4 (no match): Tell the user these rules stay as guidance — custom-rule synthesis is a planned skill, not yet available.